从次贷危机看资产证券化监管规则的完善

资产证券化是金融机构为降低市场利率风险和规避监管创造性的产物．对这场次贷危机起到了推波助澜的作用,但资产证券化本身并没有错,错误的是它被不恰当的利用。资产证券化是金融虚拟性演进到高级阶段的结果,是被监管者为规避监管以追逐最高利润为目的设计的行为模式。次贷危机为我国资产证券化监管提供的启示是明确真实买卖标准、强化信息披露．规范基础资产范围。     

论我国个人住房抵押贷款保险体系的构建

个人住房抵押贷款保险的主要功能是为借款人中请高比例的个人住房抵押贷款提供信用支持。在我国个人住房抵押贷款保险体系的建设过程中,政府应当发挥主导作用,适时组建政策性保险机构,为广大中低收入者申请高比例的个人住房抵押贷款提供保证保险,以降低其购房“门槛”,保障其基本的居住需求。此外,政府还可根据住房市场发展的客观需要,鼓励、引导和扶持商业保险公司为借款人中请高比例的个人住房抵押贷款提供保证保险。     

浅析资产证券化在我国的发展及对策

对于银行资产负债结构的改善具有极其重要的作用 ,它是近几十年来国际金融领域中最重要的一种金融创新。但资产证券化在我国的出现只是近几年的事情 ,而且进展步伐一直比较缓慢。为了刺激消费、启动内需和建立现代商业银行体系等 ,资产证券化已成为我国现实的必需。资产证券化应在政府的大力扶持下 ,从成立银行之间贷款买卖市场开始有序展开 ,通过试点后逐步推广     

合同诈骗罪数额要论

合同诈骗罪作为一种财产型犯罪 ,其诈骗数额研究对定罪和量刑具有重要意义。文章认为 ,应以受骗人因行骗人的行骗行为造成的直接损失数额 ,作为合同诈骗犯罪定罪数额的理论依据 ;在合同诈骗罪定罪数额的计算标准上 ,应采用诈骗行为发生时的当时、当地该物品的市场价格 ,同时参照被骗者的实际损失计算 ;对连环合同诈骗行为定罪数额的计算 ,应以行为人的合同诈骗行为给社会造成的实际损失数额 ,作为认定的理论依据     

资产证券化的基本理论及风险量化分析

70年代以来,全球兴起一股金融创新浪潮,各种金融创新工具不断涌现,而其中资产证券化以其精妙的构思、独特的功能为众人所瞩目.资产证券化是近几十年来世界金融领域最重大的创新之一.本文阐述了资产证券化的基本概念、基本结构、基本作用,介绍了建立以抵押贷款为担保发行的资产支持证券的定量模型.     

上海市房地产法律制度借鉴的研究

文章旨在通过对上海市房地产法律制度进行深入具体的借鉴比较研究,为我国其它地区房地产经济的发展提供参考。在整体借鉴模式上借鉴香港新加坡模式。在借鉴具体制度上,借鉴发达国家和地区的房地产市场制度。值得注意的是,上海市在借鉴有关国家和地区的房地产立法的同时,紧密结合我国和上海市的具体情况,进行了完善和创新。     

论人力资本的产权特征与企业所有权安排

同非人力资本产权相比 ,人力资本产权具有人力资本与其所有者不可分离、人力资本的价值信息容易隐藏、人力资本必须在其所有者的协作劳动中发挥作用等方面的典型特征 ,这些特征决定了人力资本同非人力资本一样 ,不仅能够承担风险 ,而且还具有可抵押性 ,从而得出了有效率的企业必须实现人力资本所有者与非人力资本所有者共同分享所有权的结论 ,阐释了企业组织形式变化中 ,人力资本逐步得到重视的原因 ,也为经营者股权奖励、职工持股计划等改革方案的实施提供了理论依据。     

The market for (Ir)reproducible econometrics

Context: As the volume and complexity of research have increased, the amount of time spent on Institutional Review Board (IRB) review has decreased. The complexity of research has expanded, requiring increasingly specialized knowledge to review it. Dilemma: Under the current system, increasing numbers of research studies requiring expertise in ethics, new technologies or diverse study designs place a substantial burden upon local IRBs and often result in substantial variability among their reviews. This lack of uniformity in the review process creates uneven human subjects’ protection thus undermining the intent of the Common Rule. Objectives: To outline a scenario for expert centralized IRB review via implementation of a national virtual IRB review system overseen by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Conclusions: The complicated ethical issues and science involved in much of current research warrant an expert review panel. Centralized review would enable expert review specific to the research at hand, ensure consistency in human subjects protection, reduce the burden on local IRBs, and may reduce time spent obtaining approval. A centralized virtual system would allow IRB members to remain at their institutions while providing unprecedented expert review through currently available technology, and make information regarding monitoring and adverse event reporting available online in real-time.     

The limits of the decentred state: the case of policing insurance claims fraud

Existing research clearly shows that the public–private divide is continuously being challenged, recast and transformed. However, this article argues that a sharp distinction between public and private continues to operate as an important norm for professionals involved in the investigation of insurance claims fraud in Sweden. It shows how power within private insurance companies and the police authority is organized around the public–private divide, which is in turn mobilized to justify repression and to give investigations legitimacy. The article indicates that the formal public–private distinction is far more thoroughly maintained than is suggested by the existing literature. Rather than challenging the centrality of state power, private insurers and the police construct, maintain and have a stake in the reproduction of a state‐centric monopoly of crime control.     

Bonus—Malus模型在银行贷款机制中的应用

将Bonus—MalLis模型应用到银行贷款业务,通过调整银行的Bonus-MalLis贷款利率来减少贷款欺诈行为。主要是建立借款人的银行个人信用体系,通过借款人上阶段的还款利率和表现决定其下阶段还款利率,这样就提供了一种与完全审计机制不同的奖惩机制。在一些简单假设下可证明Bonus—Malus利率将会消除所有欺诈行为,而非仅仅减少欺诈行为。