马克斯·舍勒怨恨理论述评

马克斯·舍勒立足于对人的界定，以现象学还原方法深入爱恨秩序，探讨怨恨的根源及途径，将怨恨界定为资本主义时代人的精神气质，并在社会文化精神的普遍意义上对怨恨予以伦理追问，认为怨恨是人类意识中出现的价值颠倒或价值崩溃的根源，它导致现代价值体验结构的转型和价值位移。舍勒的怨恨理论对中国的现代化进程无疑有极大的启发意义。     

Fostering cultural development: Foster parents' perspectives

Given the increased number of children from racialized groups requiring foster care and the decreasing number of foster parents from racialized groups, transcultural foster placements are on the rise. Addressing racial and cultural diversities within the context of transcultural foster care placements is one of the most pressing dilemmas of contemporary child protection practice, in Canada. In this qualitative exploratory study, the perspectives of regular non-kinship foster parents in two Canadian provinces, who provide foster care to children and youth from racialized groups, were explored through open-ended semi-structured interviews. Participants consisted of nine foster parents, between the ages of 30 and over 60 years old, who were asked to share their experiences regarding transcultural foster care placements. The results of this study indicated foster parents were culturally receptive and ‘fostering cultural development’ in their homes as well as their respective communities.     

国家的怨恨性崛起与全球失序

一个国家实力陡增,并成功突破既定国际秩序且发挥出重大国际影响,是为国家崛起。国家崛起可以区分为顺应性崛起与怨恨性崛起两类。前者依赖于国家缓慢而长久的发展,其间伴有起伏、波折乃至战争,但主要是以经年累月的发展积累竟功。后者仰仗国家巨大的雪耻决心、实力的陡然增长、骤然改变国际秩序、诉诸战争的决绝和进入理想社会的煽动。英、美两国是前一类崛起的代表性国家。德、日与苏联是后一类崛起的标志性国家。国家的怨恨性崛起一定会导致既定国际秩序的颠覆。但在怨恨中崛起的国家,因其在意的仅仅是国家自身能力的强大,以及在国际社会中的实力提升,因此无力提供新的国际秩序。怨恨性崛起的国家或在战争中失败,丧失忽然获得的崛起国地位;或在和平的国家间竞争中败下阵来,无从发挥崛起国所意图的国际领导权。     

A complicated passport: racialized realities and lessons from visible minority women teachers

This article presents key findings derived from the experiences of visible minority woman as teachers in Canada, whose lived realities reveal myriad instances of compromise. The ethnic, cultural and racial diversity among teachers is an area that has garnered attention as it pertains to equitable work environments, teacher–student relations, and multicultural education. The challenges and responsibility of representing one’s racialized identity, ethnicity, culture, and religion while finding oneself marginalized within mainstream populace is critically examined through their narratives and reflexivity. In instances of blatant discrimination, bridging the public and private sphere, to moments of fulfillment, the resilience of these women is a defining factor of their success within adversity. Through their experiences there is opportunity to inform and advance the notions of diversity, representation, and distinctiveness of teachers in educational settings and the impact this has on an intercontinental symbol of society values in education.     

Entertainers or education researchers? The challenges associated with presenting while black

How black faculty experience presenting their research in educational venues within the context of historical objectification of black people as sources of entertainment is an underexplored topic in higher education research. Presenting research has far-reaching implications for black academics’ advancement, such as future employment and opportunities for research collaboration. Thus, how black faculty are perceived while presenting has significant implications for their career trajectories. This study is concerned with understanding how black higher education faculty perceive, interpret, and respond to how they are perceived while presenting within a context of racialized academic scrutiny. Thirty-three black professors were interviewed about their participation in a number of presentation contexts, including national conferences, symposia, and campus job talks. Study participants discussed encountering multiple layers of racial stereotyping and bias, and also how their keen racial awareness enabled them to develop strategic coping mechanisms to manage audience reactions. These strategies also represented the self-sacrifices they made that altered their racial identities. By examining black faculty members’ struggles to be valued personally and professionally in white-dominated academic sites, the study findings can enrich critical interpretations of racism in higher education.     

从《古今和歌集序》与《毛诗大序》、《诗品序》看中日诗学差异

《古今和歌集序》受到《毛诗大序》、《诗品序》的直接影响 ,但《古今和歌集序》绝非雷同之作 ,中日诗学的差异在于 :一个重儒家教化与怨刺 ,另一个重悯物崇情。     

现代性体验与文学现代性分期

当前有关中国现代性的研究 ,忽略了它的基础问题 ,现在应当回到现代性的地面。人的现实生存体验正构成中国现代性的地面。现代性归根结底是人的生存体验 ,其基调是怨羡情结 ,含惊羡体验、感愤体验、回瞥体验和断零体验四种类型。从现代性体验可以对文学现代性提出一种新的分期 ,看到现代 1和现代 2两种形态。     

从歌颂到反讽--革命者形象的变迁与王蒙创作心态的变化

有关革命者生涯的记忆是作家王蒙最为刻骨铭心的记忆,对于革命和革命者形象王蒙进行了不断的书写和重写.从<青春万岁>到新时期初的<布礼>、<蝴蝶>,再到后来的"季节"系列,作家对革命者形象的书写经历了纯情的歌颂、痛苦的分裂和忧愤的反讽三个阶段.王蒙作品中革命者形象的演变极为深刻地体现了作家创作心态的发展变化.     

弃逐逆境中的愤悱与宣泄——柳宗元贬谪心态探析

弃逐逆境中的柳宗元,其情绪的主导方面是“怨怼忿愤”。柳宗元的愤懑,主要来源于“有劳而见罪”、无辜而被逐,以及因此遭受精神和肉体的折磨。柳宗元愤而启,悱而发,用自己的方式宣泄郁愤。他愤山、愤水、愤物,归根到底却是愤人,愤“灵”与“帝”。当宣泄的对象归结到“灵”与“帝”的时候,柳宗元的愤悱便发生了根本变化。     

In and out from the European margins: reshuffling mobilities and legal statuses of Romani minorities between the Post-Yugoslav space and the European Union

ABSTRACT

This paper traces the mobilities of Romani minorities between the ‘old’ EU Member States and the non-EU Post-Yugoslav space. It unravels how the mobilities of Romani individuals, who are Non-EU Post-Yugoslav citizens, were different from the mobilities of Roma coming from other post-socialist spaces, now EU Member States. Instead of focusing on motivations for mobility of Romani individuals as some previous work has done, this paper investigates the treatment of these mobilities by different states and the legal statuses these states ascribe to those labelled as Romani migrants. By using the combination historical and socio-legal analysis, this paper diachronically examines the precarious migrant statuses of Post-Yugoslav Romani minorities in the old EU, such as Yugoslav labour migrants, Post-Yugoslav forced migrants and subsequently the ‘bogus’ asylum seekers. The paper points to the interconnectedness of these statuses, but also to their interminable liminality: they are constantly on the verge of being rendered ‘illegal’ and are hence subject to deportability. I claim that while their legal statuses are being reshuffled, their liminality and interconnectedness also contribute to circular mobilities between the Post-Yugoslav space and the EU. I investigate how these mobilities are not only socially produced, but are also legally and politically conditioned by the hierarchical relationship between the Post-Yugoslav space and the EU. As a side effect of this relationship, Roma are positioned as a racialized minority, treated only as temporary migrants in their ‘host country’ and without prospects of inclusion in their ‘country of origin’ as minority citizens.