加强高校青年教师思想政治工作的思考

青年教师是高等院校的未来,青年教师的思想政治状况如何,直接关系到21世纪人才培养的方向和质量。加强高等院校青年教师的思想政治工作,是高等学校的一项既重要又紧迫的战略任务。本文分析探讨了当前高等院校青年教师的思想状况和存在问题,提出了加强高等院校青年教师思想政治工作的途径。     

青年马克思对费尔巴哈人本主义思想的批判

在马克思创立新世界观的过程中,费尔巴哈对青年马克思的思想变化发展有过深刻的影响,但不能由此推断青年马克思曾是费尔巴哈式的人本主义者。因为青年马克思哲学的发展有其自身的内在线索,同时两者的哲学性质不同,追求的个人与社会生活的目标不同,关注问题的角度不同,考察问题的方法和解决问题的方式亦不同。     

自主创业——青年学生就业的重要途径

在未来一段时期,我国面临的就业压力依然很大.要解决大学生就业难,自主创业是一条重要途径.为此,青年学生要注意培养自我创业的意识和企业家精神.学校应建立学生创业长效机制,在课程设置等方面加大创业型学生培养力度.近几年来,政府及有关部门,正努力为青年学生自主创业创造良好的外部环境.     

幼儿园新教师观察能力现状调查与分析——基于福建省幼儿园调查

幼儿园教师专业性的重要体现是通过观察和解读儿童,为儿童提供适宜的支持,促进幼儿的学习与发展。通过问卷调研福建省1062名幼儿园新教师观察能力现状,从确定观察目标、选择和运用观察方法、筛选观察信息和观察记录以及观察分析和支持四个维度进行分析。研究发现：幼儿园新教师具备较强的观察意识,但是观察能力普遍处于低水平观察。新教师的观察能力在学历、幼儿园等级、幼儿园性质、幼儿园所处地域上呈现显著性差异。研究建议：完善职前课程培养体系,通过情境式的研训方式提升新教师的观察能力。     

审美趣味代际传承与日常生活美育体系建构

审美趣味代际传承是青少年趣味养成的重要路径,日常生活美育则是现代美育的重要内容。随着美学中日常生活审美化的转向,以及社会文化消费化的转型,传统的审美趣味代际传承之间产生了较大的裂缝。青少年日常生活美育存在诸多问题,成人美育又长期被忽视,给当下美育体系的构建提出了不小的挑战。我们需要在日常生活中寻求审美趣味代际传承的有效模式和途径,以丰富社会美育内容,优化生活美育模式,扩展全民美育范围,发掘艺术美育功能,努力实现代际之间审美文化的有效沟通,提升各自的审美趣味。     

‘Becoming’ a possible threat: masculinity,culture and questioning among unaccompanied young men in Sweden

A debate on masculinity and immigration rose across Europe in 2015 after an incident with sexual harassments taking place in Cologne, Germany. The incident refuelled a debate positioning unaccompanied young men as a possible threat. This article is based on a research project where we during this time ethnographically followed 20 young men, having arrived in Sweden as ‘unaccompanied’ minors. The aim is to examine how the young men themselves talk about, reflect on and negotiate masculinity and gender during this period. The article concludes that masculinity cannot be approached as something stable easily being inherited or transferred from one’s origins. One difference for ‘unaccompanied’ young men is how conflicts or tensions emerging in relation to issues of gender and masculinity tend to be interpreted differently, and publicly, putting the young men in a ‘gendered situation of questioning’.     

“To get the word out”: LGBTQ+ Young adults’ motivations for participating in qualitative research studies

Understanding why socially marginalized individuals, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer (LGBTQ+) people, participate in research can improve qualitative research designs, as well as social services and policies. In providing a participant-centered foundation, we interviewed 65 LGBTQ+ young adults and asked “Why are certain LGBTQ+ young adults motivated to engage in qualitative social science studies?” Many LGBTQ+ young people said they were committed to enacting social change and promoting advocacy. Participants also highlighted supporting scientific research and knowledge production. Finally, LGBTQ?+ participants engaged with research to introspectively analyze their identity development processes. These findings can facilitate access to socially vulnerable and underrepresented groups through a methodological focus on participant benefits.     

Supporting foster and kinship carers to promote the mental health of children

The majority of children and young people removed from the care of their parents by the state of Victoria, Australia, reside in foster or kinship care. These children have experienced a broad range of adverse conditions and are up to 4 times more likely to experience problems with mental health than their mainstream peers. This paper draws on the perspectives of foster and kinship carers, describing the disconnection between their role as mental health advocates and their interest in early intervention in a field which is dominated by crisis and the historic marginalisation of foster and kinship carers. Thirty‐one foster and kinship carers across greater metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, contributed to this study through interviews and focus groups. Participants demonstrated a practical understanding of mental health and an ability to identify a range of conditions that have an adverse impact on the mental health of children and young people in their care. The paper concludes that there is a lack of systemic support and even a range of barriers that affect the capacity of foster and kinship carers to promote the mental health and well‐being of the children and young people in their care.