An Equilibrium Theory of Learning,Search, and Wages

We examine the labor market effects of incomplete information about the workers' own job‐finding process. Search outcomes convey valuable information, and learning from search generates endogenous heterogeneity in workers' beliefs about their job‐finding probability. We characterize this process and analyze its interactions with job creation and wage determination. Our theory sheds new light on how unemployment can affect workers' labor market outcomes and wage determination, providing a rational explanation for discouragement as the consequence of negative search outcomes. In particular, longer unemployment durations are likely to be followed by lower reemployment wages because a worker's beliefs about his job‐finding process deteriorate with unemployment duration. Moreover, our analysis provides a set of useful results on dynamic programming with optimal learning.     

Constrained penalized splines

The penalized spline is a popular method for function estimation when the assumption of “smoothness” is valid. In this paper, methods for estimation and inference are proposed using penalized splines under additional constraints of shape, such as monotonicity or convexity. The constrained penalized spline estimator is shown to have the same convergence rates as the corresponding unconstrained penalized spline, although in practice the squared error loss is typically smaller for the constrained versions. The penalty parameter may be chosen with generalized cross‐validation, which also provides a method for determining if the shape restrictions hold. The method is not a formal hypothesis test, but is shown to have nice large‐sample properties, and simulations show that it compares well with existing tests for monotonicity. Extensions to the partial linear model, the generalized regression model, and the varying coefficient model are given, and examples demonstrate the utility of the methods. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 40: 190–206; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada     

Measures of centrality for multivariate and directional distributions

Measures of centrality that generalize the univariate median are studied and applied to multivariate and directional distributions. A standard example is developed for general multivariate settings, and the uniqueness of the median proved for distributions satisfying certain regularity conditions. In the presence of weaker regularity, this median is shown to be of codimension 2. Conditions are also provided for these measures of centrality to be equivariant under transformations on the sample space. The equivariance of the usual univariate median under monotone transformations is seen as a special case.     

An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects

The ability of quantile regression models to characterize the heterogeneous impact of variables on different points of an outcome distribution makes them appealing in many economic applications. However, in observational studies, the variables of interest (e.g., education, prices) are often endogenous, making conventional quantile regression inconsistent and hence inappropriate for recovering the causal effects of these variables on the quantiles of economic outcomes. In order to address this problem, we develop a model of quantile treatment effects (QTE) in the presence of endogeneity and obtain conditions for identification of the QTE without functional form assumptions. The principal feature of the model is the imposition of conditions that restrict the evolution of ranks across treatment states. This feature allows us to overcome the endogeneity problem and recover the true QTE through the use of instrumental variables. The proposed model can also be equivalently viewed as a structural simultaneous equation model with nonadditive errors, where QTE can be interpreted as the structural quantile effects (SQE).     

二阶四点边值问题上下解方法

研究了一类二阶非线性常微分方程四点边值问题解的存在性与唯一性,利用上下解和单调迭代方法得到了解的存在和唯一的充分条件,并给出了求解的单调迭代序列和误差估计公式.     

Partial identification of average treatment effects on the treated through difference-in-differences

ABSTRACT

The difference-in-differences (DID) method is widely used as a tool for identifying causal effects of treatments in program evaluation. When panel data sets are available, it is well-known that the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) is point-identified under the DID setup. If a panel data set is not available, repeated cross sections (pretreatment and posttreatment) may be used, but may not point-identify the ATT. This paper systematically studies the identification of the ATT under the DID setup when posttreatment treatment status is unknown for the pretreatment sample. This is done through a novel application of an extension of a continuous version of the classical monotone rearrangement inequality which allows for general copula bounds. The identifying power of an instrumental variable and of a ‘matched subsample’ is also explored. Finally, we illustrate our approach by estimating the effect of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 on employment outcomes of the disabled.     

Nonparametric Knn estimation with monotone constraints

ABSTRACT

The K-nearest-neighbor (Knn) method is known to be more suitable in fitting nonparametrically specified curves than the kernel method (with a globally fixed smoothing parameter) when data sets are highly unevenly distributed. In this paper, we propose to estimate a nonparametric regression function subject to a monotonicity restriction using the Knn method. We also propose using a new convergence criterion to measure the closeness between an unconstrained and the (monotone) constrained Knn-estimated curves. This method is an alternative to the monotone kernel methods proposed by Hall and Huang (2001 Hall, P., Huang, L.-S. (2001). Nonparametric kernel regression subject to monotonicity constraints. The Annals of Statistics 29:624–647.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and Du et al. (2013 Du, P., Parmeter, C. F., Racine, J. S. (2013). Nonparametric kernel regression with multiple predictors and multiple shape constraints. Statistic Sinica 23:1347–1371.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). We use a bootstrap procedure for testing the validity of the monotone restriction. We apply our method to the “Job Market Matching” data taken from Gan and Li (2016 Gan, L., Li, Q. (2016). Efficiency of thin and thick market. Journal of Econometrics 192(1):40–54.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and find that the unconstrained/constrained Knn estimators work better than kernel estimators for this type of highly unevenly distributed data.