首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   190篇
  免费   1篇
  国内免费   1篇
管理学   10篇
民族学   3篇
人口学   1篇
丛书文集   16篇
理论方法论   15篇
综合类   64篇
社会学   22篇
统计学   61篇
  2023年   2篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   5篇
  2018年   2篇
  2017年   1篇
  2016年   2篇
  2015年   2篇
  2014年   2篇
  2013年   49篇
  2012年   11篇
  2011年   9篇
  2010年   6篇
  2009年   5篇
  2008年   9篇
  2007年   11篇
  2006年   8篇
  2005年   10篇
  2004年   9篇
  2003年   13篇
  2002年   6篇
  2001年   6篇
  2000年   6篇
  1999年   3篇
  1998年   1篇
  1997年   4篇
  1994年   2篇
  1993年   1篇
  1986年   1篇
  1983年   3篇
  1978年   1篇
排序方式: 共有192条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
191.
The vast majority of empirical hypotheses in psychology, or in the social sciences more generally, are directional whereas in other sciences, such as the physical sciences, there are more point or narrow-interval empirical hypotheses. Characteristics of theories and auxiliary assumptions play a role in the difference. Given that psychology research strongly features directional predictions, it is important to question the extent to which these provide convincing tests of theories that they are designed to test. The present work aims to provide a nuanced view that considers the complex interaction between the obviousness of directional predictions, the obviousness of the theory from which they derive, and the quality of the auxiliary assumptions that push towards directional predictions. Then, too, there is the related issue of vulnerability of directional predictions to alternative explanations and how to address them.  相似文献   
192.
‘Theory’ is a seminal term in sociology. Sociologists tend to ask that articles, chapters and monographs are ‘theoretical’, ‘develop theory’ or ‘make a theoretical contribution’. Yet, as demonstrated in Gabriel Abend’s 2008 article ‘The Meaning of ‘Theory’, it is generally unclear what sociologists mean when they talk about theory. Abend distinguishes seven different meanings sociologists tend to impute to ‘theory’ and argues that no single definition can usefully capture these substantively different meanings. Counter to Abend, we propose and defend a minimal and versatile theory of theory, which does capture the important common denominators in sociologists' various uses of the term theory. The major strengths of our proposal are that it enables informed and synthetic discussion and fosters reflexivity about differences and similarities between different types of theory. Our minimal theory of theory thus serves as an invitation to a broader conversation about theory in sociology.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号