Minimax properties of beta kernel estimators

In this paper, we are interested in the study of beta kernel density estimators from an asymptotic minimax point of view. These estimators allows to estimate density functions with support in [0,1]. It is well-known that beta kernel estimators are - on the contrary of classical kernel estimators - “free of boundary effect” and thus are very useful in practice. The goal of this paper is to prove that there is a price to pay: for very regular density functions or for certain losses, these estimators are not minimax. Nevertheless they are minimax for classical regularities such as regularity of order two or less than two, supposed commonly in the practice and for some classical losses.     

Estimation of the location parameter and the average worth of the selected subset of two parameter exponential populations under LINEX loss function

Suppose a subset of populations is selected from k exponential populations with unknown location parameters θ₁, θ₂, …, θ_k and common known scale parameter σ. We consider the estimation of the location parameter of the selected population and the average worth of the selected subset under an asymmetric LINEX loss function. We show that the natural estimator of these parameters is biased and find the uniformly minimum risk-unbiased (UMRU) estimator of these parameters. In the case of k = 2, we find the minimax estimator of the location parameter of the smallest selected population. Furthermore, we compare numerically the risk of UMRU, minimax, and the natural estimators.     

A relaxation procedure for calculating (G–)minimax optimal designs

Summary: In nonlinear statistical models, standard optimality functions for experimental designs depend on the unknown parameters of the model. An appealing and robust concept for choosing a design is the minimax criterion. However, so far, minimax optimal designs have been calculated efficiently under various restrictive conditions only. We extend an iterative relaxation scheme originally proposed by Shimizu and Aiyoshi (1980) and prove its convergence under very general assumptions which cover a variety of situations considered in experimental design. Application to different specific design criteria is discussed and issues of practical implementation are addressed. First numerical results suggest that the method may be very efficient with respect to the number of iterations required.*Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We are grateful to a referee for his constructive suggestions.     

Relative squared error prediction in the generalized linear regression model

In linear regression models, predictors based on least squares or on generalized least squares estimators are usually applied which, however, fail in case of multicollinearity. As an alternative biased estimators like ridge estimators, Kuks-Olman estimators, Bayes or minimax estimators are sometimes suggested. In our analysis the relative instead of the generally used absolute squared error enters the objective function. An explicit minimax solution is derived which, in an important special case, can be viewed as a predictor based on a Kuks-Olman estimator.     

Combining coordinates in simultaneous estimation of normal means

The problem of combining coordinates in Stein-type estimators, when simultaneously estimating normal means, is considered. The question of deciding whether to use all coordinates in one combined shrinkage estimator or to separate into groups and use separate shrinkage estimators on each group is considered. A Bayesian viewpoint is (of necessity) taken, and it is shown that the ‘combined’ estimator is, somewhat surprisingly, often superior.     

Minimax Asymptotic Mean-Squared-Error of L-Estimators of Scale Parameter

We derive the AMSE (maximal asymptotic mean-squared-error) of the general class of L-estimators of scale that are location-scale equivariant and Fisher consistent. For non-normal error distributions, we determined estimators that have minimum AMSE over the subclass of (i) α-interquantile ranges and (ii) mixtures of at most two α-interquantile ranges. Finally, the L-estimators of scale symmetrized about the median were found to have the same AMSE as their nonsymmetrized counterparts, thus yielding the same results as in the symmetrized case.     

Minimax Estimation of the Bounded Parameter of Some Discrete Distributions Under LINEX Loss Function

For a class of discrete distributions, including Poisson(θ), Generalized Poisson(θ), Borel(m, θ), etc., we consider minimax estimation of the parameter θ under the assumption it lies in a bounded interval of the form [0, m] and a LINEX loss function. Explicit conditions for the minimax estimator to be Bayes with respect to a boundary supported prior are given. Also for Bernoulli(θ)-distribution, which is not in the mentioned class of discrete distributions, we give conditions for which the Bayes estimator of θ ∈ [0, m], m < 1 with respect to a boundary supported prior is minimax under LINEX loss function. Numerical values are given for the largest values of m for which the corresponding Bayes estimators of θ are minimax.     

MSE Performance and Minimax Regret Significance Points for a HPT Estimator when each Individual Regression Coefficient is Estimated

In this article, we consider a heterogeneous preliminary test (HPT) estimator whose components are the OLS and feasible ridge regression (FRR) estimators, and derive the exact formulae for the moments of the HPT estimator using mathematical method. Since we cannot examine the MSE of the HPT estimator analytically, we execute the numerical evaluation to investigate the MSE performance of the HPT estimator, and compare the MSE performance of the HPT estimator with those of the FRR estimator and the usual OLS estimator. Furthermore, using the minimax regret criterion proposed by Sawa and Hiromatsu (1973 Sawa , T. , Hiromatsu , T. ( 1973 ). Minimax regret significance points for a preliminary test in regression analysis . Econometrica 41 : 1093 – 1101 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we derive the optimal critical points of the preliminary F test. Our results show that the optimal significance points are greater than 19% and the optimal signicance points decrease as the denominator degrees of freedom of the preliminary F test statistic increases.