The role of reversals in order‐restricted inference

A statistical model is said to be an order‐restricted statistical model when its parameter takes its values in a closed convex cone C of the Euclidean space. In recent years, order‐restricted likelihood ratio tests and maximum likelihood estimators have been criticized on the grounds that they may violate a cone order monotonicity (COM) property, and hence reverse the cone order induced by C. The authors argue here that these reversals occur only in the case that C is an obtuse cone, and that in this case COM is an inappropriate requirement for likelihood‐based estimates and tests. They conclude that these procedures thus remain perfectly reasonable procedures for order‐restricted inference.     

ROBUST M-ESTIMATION OF THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT

Robust M-estimators of intraclass correlation coefficient, location and scale parameters are defined for familial data. It is shown that these estimators are strongly consistent. Also the asymptotic distributions of these estimators are derived when the underlying distribution is elliptically and permutationally symmetric.     

Semi-parametric estimation of disequilibrium models

This paper presents an easy-to-compute semi-parametric (SP) method to estimate a simple disequilibrium model proposed by Fair and Jaffee (1972). The proposed approach is based on a non-parametric interpretation of the EM (Expectation and Maximization) principle (Dempster et al; 1977) and the least squares method. The simple disequilibrium model includes the demand equation, the supply equation, and the condition that only the minimum of quantity demanded and quantity supplied is observed. The method used here allows one to consistently estimate the disequilibrium model without fully specifying the distribution of error terms in both demand and supply equations. Our Monte Carlo study suggests that the proposedestimator is better than the normal maximum likelihood estimator under asymmetric error distributions. and comparable to the nlaximunl likelihood estimator under synirnetric error distributions in finite samples. Aggregate U.S. labor market data from Quandt and Rosen (1988) is used to illustrate the procedure.     

The Effects of Publication Selection on Test Probabilities and Estimator Distributions

Editorial decisions, based in part on reported hypothesis test results, affect the probabilities associated with those results: the probabilities of Type I and Type II errors thus become different for readers than for authors. The distributions of published parameter estimates are similarly affected. A framework for studying the consequences of test-based information filtering is developed and illustrative examples are provided. The examples indicate that filtering can markedly distort the power functions of hypothesis tests and can induce large estimator biases and increases in mean square error. It is argued that test-based filtering is relevant not only to journal publication but to other forms of information dissemination as well.     

Towards optimal regression estimation in sample surveys

The Montanari (1987) regression estimator is optimal when the population regression coefficients are known. When the coefficients are estimated, the Montanari estimator is not optimal and can be extremely volatile. Using design‐based arguments, this paper proposes a simpler and better alternative to the Montanari estimator that is also optimal when the population regression coefficients are known. Moreover, it can be easily implemented as it involves standard weighted least squares. The estimator is applicable under single stage stratified sampling with unequal probabilities within each stratum.     

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR ADAPTIVE CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND IDENTIFICATION OF OUTLDSRS USING METHODS OF TRIMMING

In an attempt to apply robust procedures, conventional t-tables are used to approximate critical values of a Studentized t-statistic which is formed from the ratio of a trimmed mean to the square root of a suitably normed Winsorized sum of squared deviations. It is shown here that the approximation is poor if the proportion of trimming is chosen to depend on the data. Instead a data dependent alternative is given which uses adaptive trimming proportions and confidence intervals based on trimmed likelihood statistics. Resulting statistics have high efficiency at the normal model, proper coverage for confidence intervals, yet retain breakdown point one half. Average lengths of confidence intervals are competitive with those of recent Studentized confidence intervals based on the biweight over a range of underlying distributions. In addition, the adaptive trimming is used to identify potential outliers. Evidence in the form of simulations and data analysis support the new adaptive trimming approach.     

Hazard-based nonparametric survivor function estimation

Summary.  A representation is developed that expresses the bivariate survivor function as a function of the hazard function for truncated failure time variables. This leads to a class of nonparametric survivor function estimators that avoid negative mass. The transformation from hazard function to survivor function is weakly continuous and compact differentiable, so that such properties as strong consistency, weak convergence to a Gaussian process and bootstrap applicability for a hazard function estimator are inherited by the corresponding survivor function estimator. The set of point mass assignments for a survivor function estimator is readily obtained by using a simple matrix calculation on the set of hazard rate estimators. Special cases arise from a simple empirical hazard rate estimator, and from an empirical hazard rate estimator following the redistribution of singly censored observations within strips. The latter is shown to equal van der Laan's repaired nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator, for which a Greenwood-like variance estimator is given. Simulation studies are presented to compare the moderate sample performance of various nonparametric survivor function estimators.     

ON ESTIMATION OF LONG-MEMORY TIME SERIES MODELS

This paper discusses estimation associated with the long-memory time series models proposed by Granger & Joyeux (1980) and Hosking (1981). We consider the maximum likelihood estimator and the least squares estimator. Certain regularity conditions introduced by several authors to develop the asymptotic theory of these estimators do not hold in this model. However we can show that these estimators are strongly consistent, and we derive the limiting distribution and the rate of convergence.     

On equalities between BLUES,WLSEs, and SLSEs

Necessary and sufficient conditions for equalities between the best linear unbiased estimator, the weighted least-squares estimator, and the simple least-squares estimator of the expectation vector in a general Gauss-Markoff model are given in some alternative formulations. The main result states, somewhat surprisingly, that the weighted least-squares estimator cannot be identical with the simple least-squares estimator unless they both coincide with the best linear unbiased estimator.     

Robust designs and optimality of least squares for regression problems

Unbiased linear estimators are considered for the model

$\text{Y(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)=θ}{}_0\text{+}\text{∑k}\text{j=1}\text{θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+ψ(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)+ε}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{, i=1,2,…,n,}$

where ψ(x) is an unknown contamination. It is assumed that |ψ(x)|?φ(6x6) where φ is a convex function. Minimax analogues of Φ_p-optimality criteria are introduced. It is shown that, under certain (sufficient) conditions, the least squares estimators and corresponding designs are optimal in the class of all unbiased linear estimators and designs. It is also shown that, in the case when least squares estimators with symmetric design do not lead to an optimal solution, the relative efficiency of optimal least squares is not diminishing and has a uniform lower bound.