对逻辑中本体论承诺的反思

虚指名词是否能以及如何能作句子的主语这个难题,一直是逻辑哲学争论的焦点之一。对此,蒯因提出过本体论承诺的观点。事实上,在作出本体论承诺之前,必须约定一个本体世界,即对象的存在与否只能在本体世界中进行讨论。这一点是整个问题解决的关键。     

Discretionary Use of Involuntary Commitment by Case Managers of Mental Health Clients: A Case Study of Divergent Views

In an exploratory study, case managers held divergent views about their appropriate roles in involuntarily committing clients to psychiatric care. In light of vague organizational guidelines about appropriate use of involuntary commitment, case managers drew on professional social work values to form views about commitment. These values supported client self-determination, but did not clearly delineate ways for case managers' use of power and discretion concerning involuntary hospitalization, resulting in a range of understandings among case managers. This article provides a history of discretionary choices in the helping professions, cases illustrating divergent views about commitment among case managers and consequences for clients, and a discussion of ways this range may be narrowed in the future.     

信心领导：来自95家企业的证据

信心领导是基于中国企业管理研究而提出的新领导理论.从领导-下属关系角度可将信心领导定义为领导传达两类不同导向的信心:对自我的信心和对下属的信心.将这2种领导行为与下属承诺相联系,检验以上关系在不同企业竞争水平下的变化规律.对我国95家企业数据分析的结果显示,信心领导的两类"信心行为"会交互影响下属的组织承诺,另外,在激烈的竞争环境中两类行为之间的交互作用更强.     

社会工作在医德医风建设领域的介入研究

在市场经济环境下,医院的医德医风建设对于缓解医患矛盾,建立良好的医患关系显得非常重要。以往的医德医风建设往往是靠传统的政治思想工作来实现的。本文通过对我国目前医院政治思想工作的分析,研究医院政治思想工作中存在的不足和缺陷,提出以社会工作为抓手,通过党团的项目建设,以组织吸纳资源,为创新医德医风建设的新模式做思考。     

方孝孺“志于道”思想探析

方孝孺自幼研读儒学经典,明初政治严峻,其父亲遭遇牢狱之灾,由此激发了方孝孺强烈的“立法”意愿。他藉建文帝给予的为帝师机会积极地为“君臣”关系立法,弘扬“立法”精神。方孝孺认为君主要有度量容得下才华横溢的士大夫,并具体化了朱熹的“格物”思想以便士人更好地提升自我。朱棣取代建文帝而登基,方孝孺用自己的生命去坚守儒家的仁道精神,去捍卫应有的君臣法度。     

Population health performance as primary healthcare governance in Australia: professionals and the politics of performance

ABSTRACT

A range of institutional and financial instruments has been used to drive population health outcomes in primary health care in Australia. However, GP sovereignty and the corporatized nature of general practice have generated major challenges. The core of government reform strategy since 1992 has been the creation and financing of Primary HealthCare Organizations (PHCOs), in various forms, to provide an organizational basis to connect GPs to population health performance, and a closer link between the state and GPs. The shift from Divisions of General Practice, the first PHCO, to Medicare Locals (MLs) in 2011 was notable. The latter constructed the object of performance as a raft of broader population health goals, which were framed in terms of accountability to communities through public reporting. Drawing on interviews with Federal government, health professional associations, ML executives and GPs, this paper examines the ways in which such performance instruments were imagined and understood, and areas of contestation. The findings show the different rationalities at play and how different actors seek control of the policy space. They also demonstrate the political precariousness of PHCOs, and the wider difficulty of steering market-based professionals in the achievement of population health objectives.     

香港长期病患者自助组织的探索性研究

自助组织为长期病患者提供一个自助互助的平台,病患者用自身对抗疾病的经历去开解患同类病的病人,病者从一个服务接受者变为服务的提供者,这对他们的康复作用并非笔墨所能形容。本文希望通过探讨专业机构香港复康会针对长期病患者服务的介入的原则与价值观及介入方式,对中国大陆自助组织的发展起到借鉴作用。     

Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space: A Corrigendum1

Dekel, Lipman and Rustichini (2001) (henceforth DLR) axiomatically characterized three representations of preferences that allow for a desire for flexibility and/or commitment. In one of these representations (ordinal expected utility), the independence axiom is stated in a weaker form than is necessary to obtain the representation; in another (additive expected utility), the continuity axiom is too weak. In this erratum we provide examples showing that the axioms used by DLR are not sufficient, and provide stronger versions of these axioms that, together with the other axioms used by DLR, are necessary and sufficient for these two representations.     

组织承诺研究综述

从组织承诺的界定、结构、前因变量与结果变量、形成过程与测量工具等方面对已有研究进行回顾和分析,发现因为研究对象、研究方法及文化背景等方面的差异,其研究结论并非完全一致,对组织承诺的研究有待进一步深入。