On testing the skew normal hypothesis

In this work two goodness-of-fit tests are proposed for the skew normal distribution, based on properties of this family of distributions and the sample correlation coefficient. The critical values for the tests are obtained by using Monte Carlo simulation for several sample sizes and levels of significance. The power of the proposed tests are compared with that of the tests studied by Mateu et al. (2007) and the one studied by Meintanis (2007) for several sample sizes and considering diverse alternatives. The results show that the proposed tests have greater power than those studied by Mateu et al. (2007) and Meintanis (2007) against some alternative distributions.     

Improved estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary response: a case-study

During recent years, analysts have been relying on approximate methods of inference to estimate multilevel models for binary or count data. In an earlier study of random-intercept models for binary outcomes we used simulated data to demonstrate that one such approximation, known as marginal quasi-likelihood, leads to a substantial attenuation bias in the estimates of both fixed and random effects whenever the random effects are non-trivial. In this paper, we fit three-level random-intercept models to actual data for two binary outcomes, to assess whether refined approximation procedures, namely penalized quasi-likelihood and second-order improvements to marginal and penalized quasi-likelihood, also underestimate the underlying parameters. The extent of the bias is assessed by two standards of comparison: exact maximum likelihood estimates, based on a Gauss–Hermite numerical quadrature procedure, and a set of Bayesian estimates, obtained from Gibbs sampling with diffuse priors. We also examine the effectiveness of a parametric bootstrap procedure for reducing the bias. The results indicate that second-order penalized quasi-likelihood estimates provide a considerable improvement over the other approximations, but all the methods of approximate inference result in a substantial underestimation of the fixed and random effects when the random effects are sizable. We also find that the parametric bootstrap method can eliminate the bias but is computationally very intensive.     

A goodness-of-fit test for overdispersed binomial (or multinomial) models

Overdispersion or extra variation is a common phenomenon that occurs when binomial (multinomial) data exhibit larger variances than that permitted by the binomial (multinomial) model. This arises when the data are clustered or when the assumption of independence is violated. Goodness-of-fit (GOF) tests available in the overdispersion literature have focused on testing for the presence of overdispersion in the data and hence they are not applicable for choosing between the several competing overdispersion models. In this paper, we consider a GOF test proposed by Neerchal and Morel [1998. Large cluster results for two parametric multinomial extra variation models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93(443), 1078–1087], and study its distributional properties and performance characteristics. This statistic is a direct analogue of the usual Pearson chi-squared statistic, but is also applicable when the clusters are not necessarily of the same size. As this test statistic is for testing model adequacy against the alternative that the model is not adequate, it is applicable in testing two competing overdispersion models.     

Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Parametric Accelerated Failure Time Models

We give chi-squared goodness-of fit tests for parametric regression models such as accelerated failure time, proportional hazards, generalized proportional hazards, frailty models, transformation models, and models with cross-effects of survival functions. Random right censored data are used. Choice of random grouping intervals as data functions is considered.     

Comments on “Canonical Correlation in Multivariate Time Series Analysis With an Application to One-Year-Ahead and Multiyear- Ahead Macroeconomic Forecasting,” by P. W. Otter

We examine the orthogonality assumption of seasonal and nonseasonal components for official quarterly unemployment figures in Germany and the United States. Although nonperiodic correlations do not seem to reject the orthogonality assumption, a periodic analysis based on correlation functions that vary with the seasons indicates the violation of orthogonality. We find that the unadjusted data can be described by periodic autoregressive models with a unit root. In simulations we replicate the empirical findings for the German data, where we use these simple models to generate artificial samples. Multiplicative seasonal adjustment leads to large periodic correlations. Additive adjustment leads to smaller ones.     

Decriminalization and Marijuana Smoking Prevalence: Evidence From Australia

This article uses the 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey to assess the impact of marijuana decriminalization policy on marijuana smoking prevalence in Australia. Both parametric and nonparametric methods are used. The parametric approach includes endogenous probit switching, two-part, sample selection, and standard dummy variable models, while the nonparametric approach uses propensity score stratification matching. Specification analyses are also conducted. A nonparametric kernel-based test is constructed to select between parametric and nonparametric models, and the likelihood ratio test is used to choose among parametric models. Our analyses favor the endogenous switching model where decriminalization increases the probability of smoking by 16.2%.     

On Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimators

The problem of finding minimum variance unbiased estimators of various parameters for parametric distributions is an important one in statistics. This article gives analytical formulas for the minimum variance unbiased estimators of parametric functions, which are usually used in a classroom, for two types of densities. The first type is the one-parameter regular exponential family, and the second is a two-parameter family of a continuous random variable whose range depends on the unknown parameters.     

Adaptive bootstrap tests and their competitors in the c -sample location problem

This paper deals with a power comparison of different types of tests, parametric, nonparametric, robustified and adaptive ones for the two-sided c -sample location problem. A robustness study on level f in the case of heteroscedasticity and non-normal distributions is included in our study, too. First of all, we consider an adaptive test based on Hogg's concept and two adaptive Bootstrap tests using Hogg's principle. It turns out that the adaptive Hogg-test is the best one in the case of homoscedasticity but for heteroscedasticity, an adaptive Bootstrap test using Hogg's principle is preferable.     

A note reconciling ANOVA tests under unequal error variances

The purpose of this note is to derive simple testing procedures for ANOVA under heteroscedasticity by a single approach that are equivalent to the prior art in the literature obtained by the Parametric Bootstrap and the Generalized Fiducial approach. By similar approach, researchers are encouraged to derive generalized tests in other applications, as alternative to parametric bootstrap tests and fiducial tests, including ANCOVA and MANOVA under heteroscedasticity, especially in Mixed Model applications, where the bootstrap approach fails.     

Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education

Ragin’s Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is often used with small to medium samples where the researcher has good case knowledge. Employing it to analyse large survey datasets, without in-depth case knowledge, raises new challenges. We present ways of addressing these challenges. We first report a single QCA result from a configurational analysis of the British National Child Development Study dataset (highest educational qualification as a set theoretic function of social class, sex and ability). We then address the robustness of our analysis by employing Du?a and Thiem’s R QCA package to explore the consequences of (i) changing fuzzy set theoretic calibrations of ability, (ii) simulating errors in measuring ability and (iii) changing thresholds for assessing the quasi-sufficiency of causal configurations for educational achievement. We also consider how the analysis behaves under simulated re-sampling, using bootstrapping. The paper offers suggested methods to others wishing to use QCA with large n data.