浅析全概率公式的应用

归蚋总结全概率公式的理解方法、求解问题的分析方法、解题步骤以及应用此公式时应注意的事项等几点教学体会,旨在使学生能够真正理解和掌握全概率公式,从而更好地解决这类实际问题。     

时间如何前进——进化论随笔

中国古代与时偕行、与时俱化的观念,以取法天地四时的运行为基准,是一种四时循环论的变化观.我党提出的与时俱进思想的含义,是随着时代的前进而前进,和随着时代的变化而变化,体现了鲜明的时代创新精神,它的哲学基础是科学进化论.这一特征在语词上通过一个进字表达出来.虽然与时俱进和与时俱化只有一字之差,却体现了本质的超越.同时,这一表述通过对中国古代<易经>、<庄子>等经典的吸收,丰富了自身的思想内涵,也建立,了联接传统与现代的一道桥梁.当然,由于现代时间观念的一维性质,使得人们在批驳直线进化论的同时,易于陷入时间进化论,而时间进化论实际上也是一种直线进化论,这也是需要警醒的.     

浅论缩短反馈时间在中学英语写作教学中的作用

本文通过调查一所普通中学学生对教师英语作文反馈时间的偏好并进行实验研究,利用统计学的描述性统计,独立/相关样本T检验分析方法,作者发现缩短反馈时间确实能够提高学生的英语写作水平,并结合其对教学的启示进行了讨论。     

关于《诗薮》创作过程中的几个问题

文章通过对胡应麟创作《诗薮》过程的再考察,得出以下结论：《诗薮》创作次序很可能是内编、外编、杂编、续编;《诗薮》内外编、三编、四编分别有不同的刊本;《诗薮》内编当完成于1587年,《诗薮》外编主体当完成于1588年或更早,《诗薮》杂编不迟于1590年完成,《诗薮》续编完成于1590年以后;《诗薮》开始创作时间当在1584年左右。     

超越时间与空间距离的现代状况——解读安东尼·吉登斯的现代性理论

文章从结构化理论、延误的现代性、现代性的经验和反省性与自我认同五个方面对安东尼.吉登斯的现代性理论进行了分析。揭示了吉登斯如何在时间和空间的分离、脱域机制的发展和知识的反思性运用三种现代化动力基础上成功地阐释了传统社会的解构、现代社会和个人的相互建构以及现代性自身蕴含的风险。     

农村居民闲暇生活状况调查分析

在湖北省五个代表样地农村居民闲暇生活抽样调查的基础上,对影响闲暇时间总量的因素及其变化趋势进行了实证分析。结果显示：①农村居民闲暇时间分配的季节性特征明显;②农村居民闲暇时间总量呈增加趋势;③农村居民闲暇态度悄然发生转变。     

负二项分布的推广

本文主要是在二项分布,多项分布,负二项分布的基础上,把负二项分布进一步推广,给出负N项分布的定义,推导出它的概率分布,并计算出其数学期望和方差.     

Time and Work–Life Balance: The Roles of ‘Temporal Customization’ and ‘Life Temporality’

This article poses a challenge to the orthodox binary, conceptualization of work–life balance only made possible by relying on the widespread ‘clock time’ worldview, which understands employment practices in terms of the basic time = money equation. In particular, it is the balance metaphor which relies on a quantification of both work and life in order to make sense and can therefore be seen to be based on an understanding of time as a measurable and value‐able unit. This article seeks to begin the exercise of examining the concept of work–life balance through a broader concept of the temporal dimension than simply limited quantitative notions. Two temporal themes are reported from a study which identified employees who had customized their working pattern to suit the various and multi‐dimensional facets of their lifestyles and thereby successfully improved their work–life balance. Participants in this study demonstrated that an improved work–life balance is more about a mind‐set that refuses to be dominated by a work temporality and is determined to create ‘me time’ rather than e.g. simply choosing a four day week or a part‐time job. It is argued that the notion of work–life balance is more usefully conceptualized within a broader notion of ‘livingscapes’ which contain both elements of work and life and that as researchers, our challenge must be to reflect the complexity of this weave within our analyses of individuals’ work–life balance.     

Technology,Gender and Time: A Contribution to the Debate

Using the data collected from research carried out at two Portuguese universities, this article highlights the way university lecturers currently deal with space and time. Their professional activity is not externally subjected to a specific time geometry that defines their working day. Teaching and researching time–spaces are basically task oriented. Furthermore, university lecturers are increasingly requested to perform tasks in very short time periods in order to secure financial support. To a certain extent, this pressure upon their work is facilitated by the use of technology. However, technology also causes a profound reconfiguration of working times and spaces, especially because it allows lecturers to work at any time from anywhere. This not only renders university physical spaces and times virtual, but it also leads to the colonization of several other time–spaces of their social lives. This article analyses the ambivalence and difficulty of managing time–spaces, as described by the lecturers themselves, with the objective of providing a more accurate awareness of the implications of technology on their lives, as well as the hazards of the progressive externalization of academic work, particularly for women.     

Time,Stress and Intellectual Engagement in Academic Work: Exploring Gender Difference

This article is based on a pilot study that examines the effects of recent organizational and public policy changes on Canadian academics' work practices and academic culture. It explores the differences between the use of online technologies by women and male academics in managing these effects. It interprets the complex and often contradictory findings of the study through the lens of time theorization, and speculates about the broader cultural implications of academics' changing work practices, including the possibility of a gestalt shift in the identity of the university, less as a site of research and reflection on society and increasingly as a productive and efficient part of the economy.