伦理学究竟研究什么

伦理学,就其最重要和最完美的部分来说,是如何治国的科学,是治理社会的最高级、最重要、最关键的科学。伦理学,就其全部内容来说,则是关于道德价值的科学,是关于优良道德的科学。伦理学分为元伦理学和规范伦理学以及美德伦理学。元伦理学主要通过研究＂是与应该＂的关系而提出确立道德价值判断之真理和制定优良的道德规范之方法：元伦理学是关于优良道德规范制定方法的伦理学。规范伦理学主要通过社会制定道德的目的,从人的行为事实如何的客观本性中推导、制定出人的行为应该如何的优良道德规范：规范伦理学是关于优良道德规范制定过程的伦理学。美德伦理学主要研究优良道德如何由社会的外在规范转化为个人内在美德,从而使优良道德得到实现的途径：美德伦理学是关于优良道德实现途径的伦理学。     

不公平有几何？——中国城市居民收入分配公平感的测量

文章首先通过批判性地介绍几种已有的公平感测量方法,选取其中最为合适的一种在CGSS2005数据基础上测量中国城市居民的反身性公平感和非反身性公平感。其次,分别以性别、年龄、教育和单位体制变量分组,从多方面呈现了两种公平感在中国的现状。最后,作者通过使用对总体样本进行随机性拆分得到的两个样本对此测量方法的信度进行了验证。     

Contesting Community Online: Virtual Imagery among Dutch Orthodox Protestant Homosexuals

Whereas substantial scholarly attention has been paid to the online presentation of self, symbolic interactionist approaches are largely absent in the literature on virtual communities. Instead, recurrent questions are whether communities can exist online and whether specific online venues qualify as communities. This article aims to move beyond these dichotomous questions by studying how different meanings attached to an online venue can be understood from offline experiences. In a case study of a Dutch forum for orthodox Protestant homosexuals, two types of understanding of online community emerged from an analysis of fifteen in‐depth interviews. Users struggling with stigmatization in offline life seek empathic support and have an encompassing sense of online community—the forum as “refuge.” For users dealing with practical everyday questions, online contacts are part of so‐called personal communities and help ameliorate offline life—the forum as “springboard.” Apart from demonstrating that online forums can serve as Goffmanian backstages in two distinct ways, these results indicate it is fruitful to take a symbolic interactionist approach to uncover relationships between offline and online social life.     

From pension funds to piggy banks: (Perverse) consequences of the Stability and Growth Pact since the crisis

As part of their strategy for economic and monetary union, European governments committed themselves to fiscal discipline – particularly by placing limits on annual deficits and on public debt. Subsequently, and as they sought to respond to the “current crisis”, they embraced the view that only if public finances were kept under control would sustainable recovery be possible. Rules of fiscal governance were strengthened. To help them meet these rules, the governments of many member States of the European Union made changes to their pension systems or to funds they had established specifically to pay the costs of population ageing. The intention was not to cut retirement benefits or to improve the efficiency of the relevant pension schemes and institutions. Rather, it was to free up resources immediately. Funded pension schemes and pension funds were treated like “piggy banks” that were raided when times became hard. Moreover, the policies pursued succeeded in meeting their objectives only because the system of national accounts according to which outcomes are judged does not recognize the way in which most of the fiscal gains are matched by future fiscal liabilities.     

劳动力转移与粮食安全

中国快速城市化和工业化导致的大量农村劳动力向城市转移引起了决策者和学术界对粮食安全问题的担忧,但本文利用县级和农户面板数据研究发现：首先,即使到2010年,农村劳动力转移对粮食总产量的影响并不大,对主产区的粮食总产量的影响更小,这背后的机制是主产区农户会通过更多地增加其他农业生产要素来替代劳动力投入的减少;其次,劳动力转移对主产区和非主产区农户的粮食生产行为的影响以及对主要粮食作物和次要粮食作物的影响都有所不同。总之,农村劳动力迁移尚未严重威胁到中国的粮食安全,当然,政府应针对粮食主产区和非主产区实施不同的政策以保持粮食总产量的稳定,特别是要鼓励主产区的耕地流转以降低劳动力迁移的负面影响。