Robustness of Optimal Investment Decisions in Mixed Insurance/Investment Cyber Risk Management

An integrated risk management strategy, combining insurance and security investments, where the latter contribute to reduce the insurance premium, is investigated to assess whether it can lead to reduced overall security expenses. The optimal investment for this mixed strategy is derived under three insurance policies, covering, respectively, all the losses (total coverage), just those below the limit of maximum liability (partial coverage), and those above a threshold but below the maximum liability (partial coverage with deductibles). Under certain conditions (e.g., low potential loss, or either very low or very high vulnerability), the mixed strategy reverts however to insurance alone, because investments do not provide an additional benefit. When the mixed strategy is the best choice, the dominant component in the overall security expenses is the insurance premium in most cases. Optimal investment decisions require an accurate estimate of the vulnerability, whereas larger estimation errors may be tolerated for the investment-effectiveness coefficient.     

Safety Regulations and the Uncertainty of Work-Related Road Accident Loss: The Triple Identity of Chinese Local Governments Under Principal–Agent Framework

This study examines how government safety regulations affect the uncertainty of work-related road accident loss (UWRAL) by considering the multi-identity of local governments in the relationship among the central government, the local governments, and enterprises. Fixed effects panel models and mediation analyses with bootstrapping were conducted to test the hypotheses using Chinese provincial panel data from 2008 to 2014. Given the complexity and nonlinear characteristics of road safety systems, a new approach based on self-organized criticality theory is proposed to measure the uncertainty of road accident loss from a complex system perspective. We find that a regional government with detailed safety work planning (SWP), high safety supervision intensity (SSI), and safety information transparency (SIT) can decrease the UWRAL. Furthermore, our findings suggest that SSI and SIT partially mediate the relationship between the SWP of regional governments and the UWRAL, with 19.7% and 23.6% indirect effects, respectively. This study also provides the government with managerial implications by linking the results of risk assessment to decision making for risk management.     

A Smooth Nonparametric,Multivariate, Mixed-Data Location-Scale Test

Abstract

A number of tests have been proposed for assessing the location-scale assumption that is often invoked by practitioners. Existing approaches include Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Cramer–von Mises statistics that each involve measures of divergence between unknown joint distribution functions and products of marginal distributions. In practice, the unknown distribution functions embedded in these statistics are typically approximated using nonsmooth empirical distribution functions (EDFs). In a recent article, Li, Li, and Racine establish the benefits of smoothing the EDF for inference, though their theoretical results are limited to the case where the covariates are observed and the distributions unobserved, while in the current setting some covariates and their distributions are unobserved (i.e., the test relies on population error terms from a location-scale model) which necessarily involves a separate theoretical approach. We demonstrate how replacing the nonsmooth distributions of unobservables with their kernel-smoothed sample counterparts can lead to substantial power improvements, and extend existing approaches to the smooth multivariate and mixed continuous and discrete data setting in the presence of unobservables. Theoretical underpinnings are provided, Monte Carlo simulations are undertaken to assess finite-sample performance, and illustrative applications are provided.     

Sample size calculations for single-arm survival studies using transformations of the Kaplan–Meier estimator

In single-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes, the Kaplan–Meier estimator and its confidence interval are widely used to assess survival probability and median survival time. Since the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan–Meier estimator is a common result, the sample size calculation methods have not been studied in depth. An existing sample size calculation method is founded on the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan–Meier estimator using the log transformation. However, the small sample properties of the log transformed estimator are quite poor in small sample sizes (which are typical situations in single-arm trials), and the existing method uses an inappropriate standard normal approximation to calculate sample sizes. These issues can seriously influence the accuracy of results. In this paper, we propose alternative methods to determine sample sizes based on a valid standard normal approximation with several transformations that may give an accurate normal approximation even with small sample sizes. In numerical evaluations via simulations, some of the proposed methods provided more accurate results, and the empirical power of the proposed method with the arcsine square-root transformation tended to be closer to a prescribed power than the other transformations. These results were supported when methods were applied to data from three clinical trials.     

Collaborative practices in new product development projects involving suppliers

Abstract

Collaboration with suppliers in New Product Development (NPD) is essential for business competitiveness. However, the management of such collaborative project needs to focus on interactions between team members from different companies since they performed inter-organizational activities. While the impact of collaboration with suppliers on NPD project performance has been widely studied, the investigation of practices to support daily collaborative activities between both teams has received limited attention. This paper aims at developing a framework of operational practices for successful inter-organizational collaboration in NPD. The practices enacted by both project teams in six case studies were examined according to the stages of the collaboration and a knowing perspective. The results revealed some peculiarities linked to the inter-organizational context. Practices interact with each other across stages with a specific dynamic. More particularly, early in the project, practices to justify the collaboration with the suppliers are determinant for practices related to the creation of social interactions between project members and project commitment. The results also show that boundary objects are useful formal socialization mechanisms for supporting the undertaking of collaborative work.     

Shapiro–Wilk test for skew normal distributions based on data transformations

A probability property that connects the skew normal (SN) distribution with the normal distribution is used for proposing a goodness-of-fit test for the composite null hypothesis that a random sample follows an SN distribution with unknown parameters. The random sample is transformed to approximately normal random variables, and then the Shapiro–Wilk test is used for testing normality. The implementation of this test does not require neither parametric bootstrap nor the use of tables for different values of the slant parameter. An additional test for the same problem, based on a property that relates the gamma and SN distributions, is also introduced. The results of a power study conducted by the Monte Carlo simulation show some good properties of the proposed tests in comparison to existing tests for the same problem.     

Collective risk model: Poisson–Lindley and exponential distributions for Bayes premium and operational risk

In this paper the collective risk model with Poisson–Lindley and exponential distributions as the primary and secondary distributions, respectively, is developed in a detailed way. It is applied to determine the Bayes premium used in actuarial science and also to compute the regulatory capital in the analysis of operational risk. The results are illustrated with numerous examples and compared with other approaches proposed in the literature for these questions, with considerable differences being observed.     

Assessing circular error probable when the errors are elliptical normal

An important problem of continuing interest to engineers is the need to assess the circular error probable (CEP), a measure of the impact accuracy of a projectile or a measure of GPS point positioning accuracy. One of the challenges in addressing this problem is to construct some accurate confidence bounds or intervals for CEP in the small sample settings, where certain amount of systematic biases exist in testing experiments. Currently there is no general method available to deal with this challenge due to the intractability of the distributions of the existing CEP estimators. In this paper, in order to meet this challenge, several new approximate formulas are derived for calculating CEP, which are more accurate than the existing ones but still simple to use. Both exact and empirical expressions for the derivatives of CEP with respect to the population means and variances are also given. Using these formulas, three kinds of confidence bounds or intervals for CEP are proposed, which are based on the parametric bootstrap, the asymptotic distribution, and the Cornish–Fisher expansion, respectively. Moreover, a bias-corrected estimator of CEP is provided. The performances of these procedures are evaluated based on some Monte Carlo simulation studies. Both the theoretical and simulation results show that the Cornish–Fisher expansion-based procedure performs slightly better than the other two procedures when the downrange and cross-range variances are assumed the same. However, when these two variances are different, the simulation demonstrates that the bootstrap approach can be superior to the Cornish–Fisher for the small samples (say n=10), and vice versa for the moderate samples (say n=20).     

Mutual information as a measure of multivariate association: analytical properties and statistical estimation

Mutual information (also known as Kullback–Leibler divergence) can be viewed as a measure of multivariate association in a random vector. The definition incorporates the joint density as well as the marginal densities. We will focus on a representation of mutual information in terms of copula densities that is thus independent of the marginal distributions. This representation yields a different approach to estimating mutual information than the original definition does, as only the copula density has to be estimated. We review analytical properties and examples for selected distributions and discuss methods of nonparametric estimation of copula densities and hence of the mutual information from a sample. Based on a simulation study, we compare the performance of these estimators with respect to bias, standard deviation, and the root mean squared error. The Gauss and the Frank copula are considered as examples.