Comments on the paper “Bias-adjustment and calibration of jackknife variance estimator in the presence of non-response”

Singh and Arnab (2010) presented a bias adjustment to the jackknife variance estimator of Rao and Sitter (1995) in the presence of non-response. In their paper, they obtained a second-order approximation of the bias of the Rao-Sitter variance estimator and then proposed a bias-adjusted estimator based on this approximation. To compare their proposed variance estimator to various other variance estimators, they performed a simulation study and showed that their variance estimator is superior to the Rao-Sitter variance estimator. In fact they showed that the Rao-Sitter variance estimator suffers from severe underestimation. These results contradict those in the literature, which indicate that the Rao-Sitter variance estimator suffers from a positive bias if the sampling fractions are not negligible; see Rao and Sitter (1995), Lee et al. (1995) and Haziza and Picard (2011). Because of this contradiction, we felt that a further investigation was warranted. In this paper, we attempt to recreate the results of Singh and Arnab (2010) and, in fact, show that their second order approximation to the bias of the Rao-Sitter variance estimator is incorrect and that their simulation results are also questionable.     

A note on consistent estimation of Kullback–Leibler discrepancy in Poisson regression

A recent theorem by Hannig and Lee on consistency of their estimator of Kullback–Leibler discrepancy is re-proved under assumptions suitably modified to correct a fault in the original proof.     

Semiparametric Estimation in Transformation Models with Cure Fraction

Semiparametric transformation model has been extensively investigated in the literature. The model, however, has little dealt with survival data with cure fraction. In this article, we consider a class of semi-parametric transformation models, where an unknown transformation of the survival times with cure fraction is assumed to be linearly related to the covariates and the error distributions are parametrically specified by an extreme value distribution with unknown parameters. Estimators for the coefficients of covariates are obtained from pseudo Z-estimator procedures allowing censored observations. We show that the estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. The bootstrap estimation of the variances of the estimators is also investigated.     

A resampling‐based test for two crossing survival curves

The area between two survival curves is an intuitive test statistic for the classical two‐sample testing problem. We propose a bootstrap version of it for assessing the overall homogeneity of these curves. Our approach allows ties in the data as well as independent right censoring, which may differ between the groups. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic as well as of its bootstrap counterpart are derived under the null hypothesis, and their consistency is proven for general alternatives. We demonstrate the finite sample superiority of the proposed test over some existing methods in a simulation study and illustrate its application by a real‐data example.     

George W. Snedecor,Pioneer Statistician, 1881–1974

Users of statistical packages need to be aware of the influence that outlying data points can have on their statistical analyses. Robust procedures provide formal methods to spot these outliers and reduce their influence. Although a few robust procedures are mentioned in this article, one is emphasized; it is motivated by maximum likelihood estimation to make it seem more natural. Use of this procedure in regression problems is considered in some detail, and an approximate error structure is stated for the robust estimates of the regression coefficients. A few examples are given. A suggestion of how these techniques should be implemented in practice is included.     

Effects of non-normality and mild heteroscedasticity on estimators in regression

Several estimators are examined for the simple linear regression model under a controlled, experimental situation with multiple observations at each design point. The model is examined under normal and non-normal error distributions and mild heterogeneity of variances across the chosen design points. We consider the ordinary, generalized, and estimated generalized least squares estimators and several examples of M estimators. The asymptotic properties of the M estimator using the Huber ψ are presented under these conditions for the multiple regression model. A simulation study is also presented which indicates that the M estimator possesses strong robustness properties under the presence of both non-normality and mild heteroscedasticity o£ errors. Finally, the M estimates are compared to the least squares estimates in two examples.     

Constructing estimators of a mean vector through orthogonal reparametrization and differential equations

The simultaneous estimation of a mean vector is explored by reparametrizing it into its direction and norm components. A type of Pythagorean relation is employed to construct an estimate of the norm component, which results in solving an ordinary amerenuai equation, me james-Diem estimator is snown to be optimum in a class of estimators derived from general solutions of the ordinary differential equation. A new Stein-type estimator in the case of the inverse Gaussian distribution is constructed.     

On location and scale parameters of exponential distributions with censored observations

In this paper we first address the problem of estimating the common scale of several exponential distributions with unknown location parameters when censored samples are observed. The improved estimators are basically Stein type testimators. These testimators are then used to construct improved estimators of location parameters.     

AN ESTIMATION PROCEDURE FOR ERROR VARIANCE INCORPORATING PTS FOR RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL UNDER LINEX LOSS FUNCTION

In the present paper an estimator of the error variance for a three-way layout in random effects model incorporating two preliminary tests of significance has been proposed. It has been well recognized that estimation of parameters, of interest under asymmetric loss function (ASL) is generally better than that under squared error loss function (SELF), particularly where overestimation and underestimation are not equally penalised. As neither overestimation nor underestimation of error variance is desirable, with this motivation, the proposed estimator for the error variance has been studied under LINEX loss function. It is claimed that, with proper choice of degree of asymmetry and level of significance, proposed the sometimes pool estimator performs fairly better than unbiased estimator. Recommendations regarding its application have been attempted.