构建社区管理主体和谐关系

社区管理主体组织存在着许多问题。以社区为中心规定居民委员会、业主委员会和物业管理公司之间的关系,加强各组织建设是构建社区管理主体和谐关系的途径。     

云南省民办高等教育管理体制改革探析

云南省的民办高等教育近年来获得了较大的发展,但也面临着许多困难和问题。本文是在对云 南民办高等教育的充分调研的基础上,分析了云南民办高等教育管理体制的现状和存在的主要问题, 探讨其在今后的改革对策和发展思路。     

档案管理浅见

档案工作是学校工作的重要组成部分 ,做好档案工作应从管理体制、管理制度、业务建设、开发利用四个方面进行。     

环境审计的比较研究

本文在对环境审计(EA)进行解释和分类的基础上,对三大环境审计即房地产交易审计(PTA)、清洁生产审计(CPA)和环境管理体系审计(EMSA)进行了比较研究,最后提出了环境审计的核心问题和实施环境审计所需搭建的平台.     

师范专业认证背景下的高校教学管理工作的解读、梗阻与改进

师范专业认证是由相关教育部门及专业认证机构组织相应的课程与教学专家对于高校某一专业和学科的各个方面进行的专门评价活动。我国师范专业认证工作在2016年开始试点,如今已全面铺开。在师范专业认证背景下开展高校教学管理工作对于高校教学管理质量的提升及教学管理队伍建设都具有重要意义。     

基于中国国情的公共艺术建设及管理策略研究

解决当前中国公共艺术建设的瓶颈,必须立足处于现代化追赶阶段的中国特殊国情,对来自欧美国家并已在国内产生一定影响的公共艺术理论进行扬弃,注重依托现有职能部门、管理法规及美学理论,结合具体案例分析,建立一套理论上完备、现实中可行的当代中国公共艺术建设及管理策略,最终实现提高中国公共艺术建设水平的目标。     

“蒙古族聚居区”概念的边界、适用范围以及泛化解释

概念研讨和边界澄清是当代学术研究中的一个重要组成部分。本文从"蒙古族聚居区"这一固有概念起航,对其传统意义上的各种表述法予以公示,并且以此为参照系,试探性地对其进行概念澄清和论证作业,进而以民族社会学视角对本概念的现代性延伸以及它所带来的各种次生概念也进行细述。最后,在对学术界使用本概念的情况进行简单回顾的同时,把概念解释和澄清之旅置于"蒙古族发展"这一时代所赋予的研究课题上。     

New Public Management et professions dans l’État : au-delà des oppositions, quelles recompositions ?

More and more reforms in public administrations are being conducted that are based on the principles and instruments of “new public management”. They have set off protest and collective actions by several professional groups in various sectors (health, education, justice, social work, research…), whence questions about the future of professional groups in public services, in particular about their autonomy, which these reforms threaten. The opposition between this new public management and certain professional groups, is not the final explanation to draw from an analysis of this situation. Should these changes be seen as the decline of professional groups and of their autonomy, as a mutation of professional models, an overhaul of professionalism, etc.? These questions, which current events in France and Europe have raised, are a matter for ongoing sociological thought. They are approached empirically, from the field, using varied scales of analysis and research. Forms of tension between this new public management and professional groups are explored.     

The new privatized market: A question of ideology or pragmatism within the Swedish addiction treatment system?

Given its traditions of universal welfarism and social democracy, Sweden had already scored unexpectedly high on New Public Management by the 1980s. Health and welfare services remain primarily tax‐funded, but the production of care is increasingly transferred to a competitive quasi‐market. To what extent can this development be understood in terms of right‐wing governments, and to what extent in terms of other, socioeconomic and pragmatic factors? We examined this question through official statistics on providers of institutional addiction care since 1976, and through the total expenditure and purchases by local‐level municipal social services of interventions for substance users in Sweden in 1999, 2004, 2009, and 2014. We have analyzed the distribution across public and private providers within the addiction treatment system, and whether national developments and local differences across the 290 municipalities—which bear the major treatment responsibility—can be understood in terms of local‐level political majority, population size, and local wealth. The share of purchased services has remained stable, but the treatment system shows increasing financial turnover and an increasing share of for‐profit providers among producers of purchased care, especially in outpatient treatment. While venture capital enterprises emerged as a new actor, non‐governmental organizations lost out in importance. Bourgeois government correlated with larger shares of purchasing and purchases from for‐profit providers. However, purchasing on a market dominated by for‐profit providers has also become the “new normal”, regardless of ideology, and recent years have shown a reversed effect of left‐wing municipalities purchasing more services than right‐wing governments. Pragmatic reasons also influence local‐level purchasing.     

The role of ostensive and performative routine aspects in dynamic capability deployment at different organizational levels

This study clarifies how dynamic capabilities work in modifying operational capabilities at different organizational levels. While there is good understanding that routines that make up operational capabilities possess ostensive and performative aspects, whether the same applies to dynamic capabilities is unclear. In addition, there is only a limited understanding of how dynamic capabilities link to operational capabilities in terms of these two routine aspects, in general, and at different organizational levels, in particular. Our findings suggest that ostensive and performative routine aspects explain the way in which dynamic capabilities work in modifying operational capabilities. They also reveal that the pattern of the ostensive or performative routine aspects in dynamic capability deployment at a selected organizational level correspond with that associated with operational capabilities at the same level.