学术期刊形态传播媒介与学术论文价值关系辨析

学术期刊作为传播学术信息和学术成果的载体,它与学术论文的价值大小之间具有对应性和不对应性的传播关系,两者之间也并不能简单地画等号.作为一种传播媒介,学术期刊也并不具备评价已公开发表的论文价值尺度的功能,而单纯以某类刊物作为评价论文价值和奖励依据的方法,也缺乏合理性和科学性,因此,必须尊重学术文化创造和传播的规律,才能打造出学术名作和名著.     

《伊洛渊源录》与学案体

本文对“学案”的概念进行了甄别,对关于朱熹《伊洛渊源录》是否为学案体著作存在着的两种对立观点进行了辨析,认为应当认定《伊洛渊源录》为学案体的发端之作。同时,从学术史的角度考察了《伊洛渊源录》等学案体著作对先秦迄汉诸子学术史论、正史《儒林传》及目录著作等具有学术史性质著作的营养的汲取。     

论高校社科学报特色栏目的策划与建设

分析了高校社科学报目前存在的诸多问题:一是数量多,刊名相似;二是特色趋同,影响小;三是办刊模式陈旧,市场意识缺乏。认为高校社科学报在市场竞争中生存下去的手段是开办特色栏目,并指出设置特色栏目的方法:找准特色,开发作者群,选择好学术带头人。     

对当前学术批评的一些思考

近几年来,学术界的批评气氛颇为浓厚,但也出现了些不良现象:目标散乱,重点不突出;批评的态度不正常;参战者少、旁观者众;学术管理机构、学术行政领导对有学术道德问题的学者态度暧昧.要发展正常、健康的学术批评,要建章立制,规范学术批评活动;要肯定和支持学术批评的成果;要开辟更多的新阵地,提供更多的活动平台.     

On the conditions of authority in academic publics

The discourse of some of the most powerful public figures in today’s world is often incoherent and nonsensical. Incoherent yet authoritative discourse shows that authority does not rest in language but results from non‐linguistic and pre‐textual conditions. The non‐linguistic and pre‐textual conditions are exemplified in an Australian case‐study of a media debate between the Immigration Minister and a refugee, drawing on research by Smith‐Khan (2019a, 2019b). Two such conditions are then examined with reference to academic publics. First, I ask which languages do or do not carry authority, before moving on to speaker identity as a condition of authority. The close association between English and academic excellence has resulted in diminishing the authority of academic publications in languages other than English. The same is true of publications by women and people of colour. I close by reflecting on referencing practices as forms of extending authoritativeness to voices in excluded languages and from excluded scholars in academic publics.     

Data falsification and question on academic integrity

In this commentary, we argue that plagiarism is not a new problem in academic publishing and data falsification in recent times has received a great attention globally. Due to lack of literature, the objective of this study is to evaluate data falsification and academic integrity. Accordingly, the study presents the academic misconduct (Falsification/Fabrication of data and Concerns/Issues About Data) case of Professor James E. Hunton, a former top ranked accounting professor from Bentley University. The study shows how research fraud/data falsification activity in the academic world lacks honesty and morality. The study offers some recommendations for the detection of plagiarism and academic misconduct. In the age of the Internet and digital era, Crossref, iThenticate, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) would help to detect plagiarism. However, the question remains on detecting data falsification in the academic world.     

司法的隐喻

司法过程在不同的场域中遵循的是不同的逻辑:在学术场域中,司法过程是一个发现真理的过程,法律解释和法律推理是追求法律真理的手段;在权力场域中,司法过程事实上是各行动者之间的权力话语斗争,法律解释和法律推理是法官根据特定权力场域的权力关系所利用的一种策略。两种相互冲突的逻辑必须在司法过程中达到完好的整合,只有这样,才能为司法过程中的权力关系提供合法性。     

论高校辅导员在学风建设中的作用

对合肥市七所高校的1 200名学生进行问卷调查,发现高校学风中存在一些问题,需要我们给予高度重视。高校辅导员具有管理与育人的双重身份,在学风建设中起着不可替代的作用。文章就高校辅导员如何充分发挥在学风建设中的作用,提出了一些意见。     

博克的学术自由与大学自治观

博克认为,学术自由与大学自治是大学的精神,但是,其内涵随着时代的更迭而演变.如今,博克的这一观点在现实中面临着诸多困境,其中,大学自治与政府约束的冲突,以及大学维护学术自由与承担社会服务之间的矛盾尤为明显.大学难以回避现实,不得不寻找新的平衡点.     

构建学术交流平台，提升研究生创新思维能力

创新思维能力是评价研究生创新能力的核心,而学术交流平台的构建为研究生提供了良好的、规范的学习和交流的空间,是提升其创新思维能力必不可少的关键环节和有效途径。