Parental partnership and joblessness in childhood and their influence on young people's outcomes

Summary.  The paper estimates the relationship between several outcomes in early adulthood (education, inactivity, early birth, distress and smoking) and experiences of life in a single-parent family and with jobless parent(s) during childhood. The analysis is performed using a sample of young adults, who are selected from the first nine waves of the British Household Panel Survey (1991–1999) and can be matched with at least one parent and one sibling over the same period. This sample allows us to estimate the relationship of interest by using sibling differences. We also use another sample of young adults from the British Household Panel Survey, matched to at least one parent, to estimate more conventional level models and to compute nonparametric bounds and point estimates. The estimates based on sibling differences require weaker assumptions (compared with the assumptions that are imposed by nonparametric estimators under conditional independence and level estimators) for the identification of the effects of family structure and parental joblessness on the outcomes under analysis. We find that experiences of life in a single-parent family and with jobless parents during childhood are usually associated with disadvantageous outcomes for young adults, the effect of family structure is in general significantly greater (in absolute value) than the effect of parental worklessness and most of the unfavourable outcomes are linked to an early family disruption, when the child was aged 0–5 years, whereas the timing of parental joblessness during childhood has more complex effects, with different outcomes being more strongly influenced by parental worklessness at different ages of the child.     

A class of Stein‐rules in multivariate regression model with structural changes

In this paper, we consider an estimation problem of the matrix of the regression coefficients in multivariate regression models with unknown change‐points. More precisely, we consider the case where the target parameter satisfies an uncertain linear restriction. Under general conditions, we propose a class of estimators that includes as special cases shrinkage estimators (SEs) and both the unrestricted and restricted estimator. We also derive a more general condition for the SEs to dominate the unrestricted estimator. To this end, we extend some results underlying the multidimensional version of the mixingale central limit theorem as well as some important identities for deriving the risk function of SEs. Finally, we present some simulation studies that corroborate the theoretical findings.     

Improved estimation of quantiles of two normal populations with common mean and ordered variances

Abstract

Estimation of quantiles from two normal populations is considered under the assumption of common mean and ordered variances. Several new estimators have been proposed using certain estimators of the common mean, including the plug-in type restricted MLE. A sufficient condition for improving equivariant estimators is proved and as a result improved estimators are derived. The percentage of risk improvements for each of the improved estimators have been computed numerically, which are quite significant. All the improved estimators have been compared numerically using Monte-Carlo simulation method. Finally, recommendations have been made for the use of estimators in practice.     

Estimation of the parameters of a general student’s t distribution

We have observations for a t distribution with unknown mean, variance, and degrees of freedom, each of which we wish to estimate. The major problem lies in the estimate of the degrees of freedom. We show that a relatively efficient yet very simple estimator is a given function of the ratio of percentile estimates. We derive the appropriate estimator, provide equations for transformation and standard errors, contrast this with other estimators, and give examples.     

Estimator Choice and Fisher's Paradox: A Monte Carlo Study

Abstract

This paper argues that Fisher's paradox can be explained away in terms of estimator choice. We analyse by means of Monte Carlo experiments the small sample properties of a large set of estimators (including virtually all available single-equation estimators), and compute the critical values based on the empirical distributions of the t-statistics, for a variety of Data Generation Processes (DGPs), allowing for structural breaks, ARCH effects etc. We show that precisely the estimators most commonly used in the literature, namely OLS, Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and non-prewhitened FMLS, have the worst performance in small samples, and produce rejections of the Fisher hypothesis. If one employs the estimators with the most desirable properties (i.e., the smallest downward bias and the minimum shift in the distribution of the associated t-statistics), or if one uses the empirical critical values, the evidence based on US data is strongly supportive of the Fisher relation, consistently with many theoretical models.     

A new class of ratio-type estimators for improving mean estimation of nonsensitive and sensitive variables by using supplementary information

ABSTRACT

Motivated by some recent improvements for mean estimation in finite sampling theory, we propose, in a design-based approach, a new class of ratio-type estimators. The class is initially discussed on the assumption that the study variable has a nonsensitive nature, meaning that it deals with topics that do not generate embarrassment when respondents are directly questioned about them. Under this standard setting, some estimators belonging to the class are shown and the bias, mean square error and minimum mean square error are determined up to the first-order of approximation. The class is subsequently extended to the case where the study variable refers to sensitive issues which produce measurement errors due to nonresponses and/or untruthful reporting. These errors may be reduced by enhancing respondent cooperation through scrambled response methods that mask the true value of the sensitive variable. Hence, four methods (say the additive, multiplicative, mixed and combined additive-multiplicative methods) are discussed for the purposes of the article. Finally, a simulation study is carried out to assess the performance of the proposed class by comparing a number of competing estimators, both in the sensitive and the nonsensitive setting.     

Untransformed first observation problem in regression model with moving average process

This paper shows the impact of underestimation of variance of an estima-tor when first observation is left untransformed to simplify the computational procedure. In fact, the bias of the variance is not diminishing even for large sample size for the model considered. By partitioning the covariance matrix into two parts, this paper explains why least square estimator with untrans-formed first observation shows such a consequence. To demonstrate this, an exact GLS estimator is developed by modifying an approximate estimator. Nonetheless, the computational simplicity remains same.     

Testing equality of population variances the robust way

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the robustness (stability of Type I error to deviations from normality) and power properties of various tests for testing equality of population variances. It is shown that the tests based on Tiku’ s (1967, 1980, 1982) MML estimators have good robustness properties and are the most powerful overall.     

Turing’s anticipation of empirical bayes in connection with the cryptanalysis of the naval enigma *

The Enigma was a cryptographic (enciphering) machine used by the German military during WWII. The German navy changed part of the Enigma keys every other day. One of the important cryptanalytic attacks against the naval usage was called Banburismus, a sequentiai Bayesian procedure (anticipating sequential analysis) which was used from the sorine of 1941 until the middle of 1943. It was invented mainlv bv A. M. Turina and was perhaps the first important sequential Bayesian IE is unnecessab to describe it here. Before Banburismus could be started on a given day it was necessary to identifv which of nine ‘biaram’ (or ‘diaraph’) tables was in use on that day. In Turing’s approach to this identification hk had io istimate the probabilities of certain ‘trigraphs’. rrhese trigraphs were used. as described below. for determinine the initial wheel settings of messages). For estimatidg the probabilities, Turing inventedin important special case o the nonparametric (nonhypermetric) Empirid Bayes method independently of Herbert Robbins. The techniaue is the sumxisine form of Emdrical Baves in which a physical prior is assumed to eist but no apbroxiGate functional fonn is assumed for it.