Multivariate attribute control chart using Mahalanobis D2 statistic

Process control involves repeated hypothesis testing based on several samples. However, process control is not exactly hypothesis testing as such since it deals with detection of non-random patterns of variation as well in a fleeting kind of population. Compare this with hypothesis testing which is principally meant for a stagnant population. Dr Walter A. Shewhart introduced a graphic method for doing this testing in a fleeting population in 1924. This graphic method came to be known as control chart and is widely used throughout the world today for process management purposes. Subsequently there was much advancement in process control techniques. In particular, when more than one variable was involved, process control techniques were developed mainly by Hicks (1955), Jackson (1956 and 1959) and Montgomery and Wadsworth (1972) based on the pioneering work of Hotelling in 1931. Most of them have worked in the area of multivariate variable control chart with the underlying distribution as multivariate normal. When more than one attribute variables are involved some works relating to test of hypothesis was done by Mahalanobis (1946). These works were also based on the Hotelling T² test. This paper expands the concept of 'Mahalanobis Distance' in case of a multinomial distribution and thereby proposes a multivariate attribute control chart.     

Separation and Lack of Separation of Subpopulation in the Mixed Distributions

This is a comparative study between the estimates of parameters of mixed distributions in the case of the possibility of separating the units of subpopulation or the absence of that possibility under the progressive type I censored test data. An iterative procedure is developed and tested numerically to obtain new estimators and their variance–covariance matrix. Finally, we will use the exact distribution of the maximum likelihood estimators as well as its asymptotic distribution and the parametric bootstrap method; then, we will discuss the construction of confidence intervals for the mean parameter and their performance is assessed through Monte Carlo simulations.     

Contingency tables with structural zeros

In this paper, the method of Hocking and Oxspring (1971) to estimate multinomial probabilities when full and partial data are available for some cells is extended to estimate the cell probabilities of a contingency table with structural zeros. The estimates are maximum likelihood, and the process is sequential. The gain in precision is due to the use of partial data and the bias of the estimates is also investigated.     

基于波动择时绩效的高维波动率估计量与预测模型研究

对协方差矩阵高频估计量和预测模型的选择，共同影响协方差的预测效果，从而影响波动择时投资组合策略的绩效。资产维数很高时，协方差矩阵高频估计量的构建会因非同步交易而丢弃大量数据，降低信息利用效率。鉴于此，将可以充分利用资产日内价格信息的KEM估计量用于估计中国股市资产的高维协方差矩阵，并与两种常用协方差矩阵估计量进行比较。进一步地，将三种估计量分别用于多元异质自回归模型、指数加权移动平均模型以及短、中、长期移动平均模型进行样本外预测，并比较在三种基于风险的投资组合策略下的经济效益。采用上证50指数中20只不同流动性成份股逐笔高频数据的实证研究发现：（1）无论是在市场平稳时期还是市场剧烈震荡期，长期移动平均模型都是高维协方差估计量预测建模的最优选择，在应用于各种波动择时策略时都可以实现最低成本和最高收益。（2）在市场平稳时期，KEM估计量是高维协方差估计的最优选择，应用于各种波动择时策略时基本都可以实现最低成本和最高收益；在市场剧烈震荡期，使用KEM估计量进行波动择时仍然可以在成本方面保持优势，但在收益上并不占优。（3）无论是在市场平稳时期还是市场剧烈震荡期，最低的成本都是在采用等风险贡献投资组合时实现的，而最高的收益则都是在采用最小方差投资组合时实现的。研究不仅首次检验了KEM估计量在常用波动择时策略中的适用性，而且首次实证了实现最为简单的长期移动平均模型在高维协方差矩阵预测中的优越性，对投资决策和风险管理等实务应用都具有重要意义。     

Variable selection for high-dimensional generalized linear model with block-missing data

In modern scientific research, multiblock missing data emerges with synthesizing information across multiple studies. However, existing imputation methods for handling block-wise missing data either focus on the single-block missing pattern or heavily rely on the model structure. In this study, we propose a single regression-based imputation algorithm for multiblock missing data. First, we conduct a sparse precision matrix estimation based on the structure of block-wise missing data. Second, we impute the missing blocks with their means conditional on the observed blocks. Theoretical results about variable selection and estimation consistency are established in the context of a generalized linear model. Moreover, simulation studies show that compared with existing methods, the proposed imputation procedure is robust to various missing mechanisms because of the good properties of regression imputation. An application to Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data also confirms the superiority of our proposed method.     

The effect of tapering on the semiparametric estimators for nonstationary long memory processes

In this paper, we study, by a Monte Carlo simulation, the effect of the order p of “Zhurbenko-Kolmogorov” taper on the asymptotic properties of semiparametric estimators. We show that p  =  [d + 1/2] + 1 gives the smallest variances and mean squared errors. These properties depend also on the truncation parameter m. Moreover, we study the impact of the short-memory components on the bias and variances of these estimators. We finally carry out an empirical application by using four monthly seasonally adjusted logarithm Consumer Price Index series.      

A new heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and inference under heteroskedasticity

To solve the heteroscedastic problem in linear regression, many different heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators have been proposed, including HC0 estimator and its variants, such as HC1, HC2, HC3, HC4, HC5 and HC4m. Each variant of the HC0 estimator aims at correcting the tendency of underestimating the true variances. In this paper, a new variant of HC0 estimator, HC5m, which is a combination of HC5 and HC4m, is proposed. Both the numerical analysis and the empirical analysis show that the quasi-t inference based on HC5m is typically more reliable than inferences based on other covariance matrix estimators, regardless of the existence of high leverage points.     

Autocovariance Estimation in Regression with a Discontinuous Signal and m‐Dependent Errors: A Difference‐Based Approach

We discuss a class of difference‐based estimators for the autocovariance in nonparametric regression when the signal is discontinuous and the errors form a stationary m‐dependent process. These estimators circumvent the particularly challenging task of pre‐estimating such an unknown regression function. We provide finite‐sample expressions of their mean squared errors for piecewise constant signals and Gaussian errors. Based on this, we derive biased‐optimized estimates that do not depend on the unknown autocovariance structure. Notably, for positively correlated errors, that part of the variance of our estimators that depend on the signal is minimal as well. Further, we provide sufficient conditions for ‐consistency; this result is extended to piecewise Hölder regression with non‐Gaussian errors. We combine our biased‐optimized autocovariance estimates with a projection‐based approach and derive covariance matrix estimates, a method that is of independent interest. An R package, several simulations and an application to biophysical measurements complement this paper.     

Testing sphericity and intraclass covariance structures under a growth curve model in high dimension

In this article, we consider the problem of testing (a) sphericity and (b) intraclass covariance structure under a growth curve model. The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the mean in a growth curve model is a weighted estimator with the inverse of the sample covariance matrix which is unstable for large p close to N and singular for p larger than N. The MLE for the covariance matrix is based on the MLE for the mean, which can be very poor for p close to N. For both structures (a) and (b), we modify the MLE for the mean to an unweighted estimator and based on this estimator we propose a new estimator for the covariance matrix. This new estimator leads to new tests for (a) and (b). We also propose two other tests for each structure, which are just based on the sample covariance matrix.

To compare the performance of all four tests we compute for each structure (a) and (b) the attained significance level and the empirical power. We show that one of the tests based on the sample covariance matrix is better than the likelihood ratio test based on the MLE.