Linear models and convex geometry: aspects of non-negative variance estimation 1

Geometric aspects of linear model theory are surveyed as they bear on mean estimation, or variance covariance component estimation. It is outlined that notions associated with linear subspaces suffice for those of the customary procedures which are solely based on linear, or multilinear algebra. While conceptually simple, these methods do not always respect convexity constraints which naturally arise in variance component estimation.

Previous work on negative estimates of variance is reviewed, followed by a more detailed study of the non-negative definite analogue of the MINQUE procedure. Some characterizations are proposed which are based on convex duality theory. Optimal estimators now correspond to (non-linear) projections onto closed convex cones, they are easy to visualise, but hard to compute. No ultimate solution can be recommended, instead the paper concludes with a list of open problems.     

Lystematic sampling of two-dimensional surfaces and related problems

The paper is largely concerned with twenty-one possible methods of sampling a plane area, with points as sampling units, for the purpose of estimating a portion of this area having certain defined characteristics. These methods result from a combination, two at a time, of random, stratified and systematic sampling in two perpendicular directions, with or without alignment of the sampled points. Eleven of these methods involve systematic sampling in one or both directions. The estimate of the proportion of the area of interest is simply the proportion of points in the total area, falling within the area having the defined characteristics. For each method the variance function is derived. Fourteen different types of space covariance functions are involved in these variance functions.     

Sensitivity Coefficient in Principal Component Analysis: Robust Case

In the classical principal component analysis (PCA), the empirical influence function for the sensitivity coefficient ρ is used to detect influential observations on the subspace spanned by the dominants principal components. In this article, we derive the influence function of ρ in the case where the reweighted minimum covariance determinant (MCD¹) is used as estimator of multivariate location and scatter. Our aim is to confirm the reliability in terms of robustness of the MCD¹ via the approach based on the influence function of the sensitivity coefficient.     

Power of analysis of covariance tests under conditional specification

The procedure-wise power functions of two strategies for balanced single-factor analysis of covariance in the presence of possibly unequal regression slopes are evaluated and illustrated. The strategies differ in the action to be taken following a re-^ jection by the preliminary test for equal slopes. The first strategy simply discards the covariate and respecifies the model as the one-way ANOVA model for testing factor effects. The second leaves the unequal slopes covariance model intact, but respecifies the factor effects hypothesis to address the factor level means adjusted to the sample average of the covariate. One additional strategy, that of testing factor effects only if the preliminary slopes test does not reject, is included for comparison purposes. Computation of the power functions requires extensive use of the results obtained in Hawkins and Han (1986) concerning the bivariate distributions of certain ratios of independent noncentral chi-square random variables.     

Wild adaptive trimming for robust estimation and cluster analysis

Trimming principles play an important role in robust statistics. However, their use for clustering typically requires some preliminary information about the contamination rate and the number of groups. We suggest a fresh approach to trimming that does not rely on this knowledge and that proves to be particularly suited for solving problems in robust cluster analysis. Our approach replaces the original K‐population (robust) estimation problem with K distinct one‐population steps, which take advantage of the good breakdown properties of trimmed estimators when the trimming level exceeds the usual bound of 0.5. In this setting, we prove that exact affine equivariance is lost on one hand but, on the other hand, an arbitrarily high breakdown point can be achieved by “anchoring” the robust estimator. We also support the use of adaptive trimming schemes, in order to infer the contamination rate from the data. A further bonus of our methodology is its ability to provide a reliable choice of the usually unknown number of groups.     

Estimation for two-way analysis of variance with correlated errors

We consider some estimation and distribution problems encountered in a two way analysis of variance model with only one observation per cell, errors correlated in one level, and the variances are not necessarily equal. The independence criteria for the row and interaction mean sum of squares and distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of the correlation coefficient are given.     

多维随机变量的特征函数及应用

傅立叶变换是数学中非常重要而有效的工具,将之应用到分布函数就产生了所谓的特征函数。通过特征函数可以使得概率中许多问题变得较为简单。本文通过介绍多维随机量特征函数的应用实例说明多维随机变量的特征函数在解决概率问题中的作用。     

Using High-Frequency Data in Dynamic Portfolio Choice

This article evaluates the economic benefit of methods that have been suggested to optimally sample (in an MSE sense) high-frequency return data for the purpose of realized variance/covariance estimation in the presence of market microstructure noise (Bandi and Russell, 2005a, 2008). We compare certainty equivalents derived from volatility-timing trading strategies relying on optimally-sampled realized variances and covariances, on realized variances and covariances obtained by sampling every 5 minutes, and on realized variances and covariances obtained by sampling every 15 minutes. In our sample, we show that a risk-averse investor who is given the option of choosing variance/covariance forecasts derived from MSE-based optimal sampling methods versus forecasts obtained from 5- and 15-minute intervals (as generally proposed in the literature) would be willing to pay up to about 80 basis points per year to achieve the level of utility that is guaranteed by optimal sampling. We find that the gains yielded by optimal sampling are economically large, statistically significant, and robust to realistic transaction costs.