The maximum likelihood estimators in the growth curve model with serial covariance structure

The maximum likelihood estimators of unknown parameters in the growth curve model with serial covariance structure under some conditions are derived in the paper.     

On some tests in manocova model with different dispersion matrices

In this article we have considered the problem of testing linear hypothesis in MANOCOVA model with different dispersion Matrices by two test procedures in the line of Anderson (1963) and fihargava CI971). Also efficiencies of the two tests have often compared.     

Test procedures in coyariamce analysis assuming a general correlation pattern

The analysis of covariance procedure is considered when the observations in each cell are equicorrelated. A correction procedure is given, A computationally easier conservative test statistic is also given. The conservative test statistic allows one to more readily determine the consequences of ignoring correlations, even slight correlations, in the analysis of covariance procedure. The difference of the corrected test and the conservative test is shown to converge in probability to zero. This conservative test is easy to implement on statistical computer packages, It is shown, that for the general correlation pattern, any test involving the regression coefficients of the covariables is an exact test. An example illustrates the procedure     

High-dimensional Markowitz portfolio optimization problem: empirical comparison of covariance matrix estimators

We compare the performance of recently developed regularized covariance matrix estimators for Markowitz's portfolio optimization and of the minimum variance portfolio (MVP) problem in particular. We focus on seven estimators that are applied to the MVP problem in the literature; three regularize the eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix, and the other four assume the sparsity of the true covariance matrix or its inverse. Comparisons are made with two sets of long-term S&P 500 stock return data that represent two extreme scenarios of active and passive management. The results show that the MVPs with sparse covariance estimators have high Sharpe ratios but that the naive diversification (also known as the ‘uniform (on market share) portfolio’) still performs well in terms of wealth growth.     

On Reproducing Linear Estimators within the Gauss–Markov Model with Stochastic Constraints

In a Gauss–Markov Model (GMM) with fixed constraints, all the relevant estimators perfectly satisfy these constraints. As soon as they become stochastic, most estimators are allowed to satisfy them only approximately, thereby leaving room for nonvanishing residuals to describe the deviation from the prior information.

Sometimes, however, linear estimators may be preferred that are able to perfectly reproduce the prior information in form of stochastic constraints, including their variances and covariances. As typical example may be considered the case where a geodetic network ought to be densified without changing the higher-order point coordinates that are usually introduced together with their variances and (some) covariances. Traditional estimators are based on the “Helmert” or “S-transformation,” respectively an adaptation of the fixed-constraints Least-Squares estimator.

Here we show that neither approach generates the optimal reproducing estimator, which will be presented in detail and compared with the other reproducing estimators in terms of their MSE-risks.     

Lag order selection for an optimal autoregressive covariance matrix estimator

A good parametric spectral estimator requires an accurate estimate of the sum of AR coefficients, however a criterion which minimizes the innovation variance not necessarily yields the best spectral estimate. This paper develops an alternative information criterion considering the bias in the sum of the parameters for the autoregressive estimator of the spectral density at frequency zero.     

Sparse matrices,and the estimation of variance components by likelihood methods

It is generally considered that analysis of variance by maximum likelihood or its variants is computationally impractical, despite existing techniques for reducing computational effect per iteration and for reducing the number of iterations to convergence. This paper shows thata major reduction in the overall computational effort can be achieved through the use of sparse-matrix algorithms that take advantage of the factorial designs that characterize most applications of large analysis-of-variance problems. In this paper, an algebraic structure for factorial designsis developed. Through this structure, it is shown that the required computations can be arranged so that sparse-matrix methods result in greatly reduced storage and time requirements.     

Tests on the Equality of Two Multiple Correlation Coefficients

Asymptotic tests are suggested for testing the equality of two multiple correlation coefficients calculated from a single sample from a multivariate normal distribution. An F test is possible only when the two dependent variables coincide and one set of independent variables is a subset of the second set. Tests are compared by simulation for situations in which the F test is inapplicable. Special attention is paid to cases in which asymptotic normality of the test statistics does not hold.     

On a superiority problem in misspecified restricted linear models

Razzaghi (1987) conjectures that a wrong choice of covariance matrix in a restricted linear model results in loss of efficiency, This conjecture is proved to be correct.     

Impact of Stratification Imbalance on Probability of Type I Error

The impact of ignoring the stratification effect on the probability of a Type I error is investigated. The evaluation is in a clinical setting where the treatments may have different response rates among the strata. Deviation from the nominal probability of a Type I error, α, depends on the stratification imbalance and the heterogeneity in the response rates; it appears that the latter has a larger impact. The probability of a Type I error is depicted for cases in which the heterogeneity in the response rate is present but there is no stratification imbalance. Three-dimensional graphs are used to demonstrate the simultaneous impact of heterogeneity in response rates and of stratification imbalance.