Empirical distribution function under heteroscedasticity

Neglecting heteroscedasticity of error terms may imply the wrong identification of a regression model (see appendix). Employment of (heteroscedasticity resistent) White's estimator of covariance matrix of estimates of regression coefficients may lead to the correct decision about the significance of individual explanatory variables under heteroscedasticity. However, White's estimator of covariance matrix was established for least squares (LS)-regression analysis (in the case when error terms are normally distributed, LS- and maximum likelihood (ML)-analysis coincide and hence then White's estimate of covariance matrix is available for ML-regression analysis, tool). To establish White's-type estimate for another estimator of regression coefficients requires Bahadur representation of the estimator in question, under heteroscedasticity of error terms. The derivation of Bahadur representation for other (robust) estimators requires some tools. As the key too proved to be a tight approximation of the empirical distribution function (d.f.) of residuals by the theoretical d.f. of the error terms of the regression model. We need the approximation to be uniform in the argument of d.f. as well as in regression coefficients. The present paper offers this approximation for the situation when the error terms are heteroscedastic.     

On the Normal Inverse Gaussian Stochastic Volatility Model

In this article, the normal inverse Gaussian stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen is extended. The resulting model has a more flexible lag structure than the original one. In addition, the second-and fourth-order moments, important properties of a volatility model, are derived. The model can be considered either as a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with nonnormal errors or as a stochastic volatility model with an inverse Gaussian distributed conditional variance. A simulation study is made to investigate the performance of the maximum likelihood estimator of the model. Finally, the model is applied to stock returns and exchange-rate movements. Its fit to two stylized facts and its forecasting performance is compared with two other volatility models.     

Heterogeneity of variance and biased hypothesis tests

This study examined the influence of heterogeneity of variance on Type I error rates and power of the independent-samples Student's t-test of equality of means on samples of scores from normal and 10 non-normal distributions. The same test of equality of means was performed on corresponding rank-transformed scores. For many non-normal distributions, both versions produced anomalous power functions, resulting partly from the fact that the hypothesis test was biased, so that under some conditions, the probability of rejecting H ₀ decreased as the difference between means increased. In all cases where bias occurred, the t-test on ranks exhibited substantially greater bias than the t-test on scores. This anomalous result was independent of the more familiar changes in Type I error rates and power attributable to unequal sample sizes combined with unequal variances.     

An improved two-stage selection procedure

The problem of selecting the best of k normal populations with unknown and possibly unequal variances is considered The two-stage procedure proposed by Rinott (1978) is improved so that less samples need to be drawn in the second-stage of the sampling scheme     

A monte carlo study of the wald,lm, and lr tests in a heteroscedastic linear model

In this paper, we examine by Monte Carlo experiments the small sample properties of the W (Wald), LM (Lagrange Multiplier) and LR (Likelihood Ratio) tests for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions under heteroscedasticity. The small sample properties of the size-corrected W, LM and LR tests proposed by Rothenberg (1984) are also examined and it is shown that the performances of the size-corrected W and LM tests are very good. Further, we examine the two-stage test which consists of a test for homoscedasticity followed by the Chow (1960) test if homoscedasticity is indicated or one of the W, LM or LR tests if heteroscedasticity should be assumed. It is shown that the pretest does not reduce much the bias in the size when the sizecorrected citical values are used in the W, LM and LR tests.     

A Joint Test for Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Dynamic Panel Data Models

This article proposes a joint test for conditional heteroscedasticity in dynamic panel data models. The test is constructed by checking the joint significance of estimates of second to pth-order serial correlation in the squares sequence of the first differenced errors. To avoid any distribution assumptions of the errors and the effects, we adopt the GMM estimation for the parameter coefficient and higher order moment estimation for the errors. Based on the estimations, a joint test is constructed for conditional heteroscedasticity in the error. The resulted test is asymptotically chi-squared under the null hypothesis and easy to implement. The small sample properties of the test are investigated by means of Monte Carlo experiments. The evidence shows that the test performs well in dynamic panel data with large number n of individuals and short periods T of time. A real data is analyzed for illustration.     

Regression analysis of autocorrelated poisson-distribution) data

A regression model assuming Poisson-dia distributed data. with autocorrelated errors falls into the class of regression models that; have the error structure which is both heteroscedastic and autocorrelated. In general, this class of regression models are not estimable. However, due to the properties of the Poisson distribution that the variance is equal to the mean, this regression model on Poisson-distributed data with autocorrelated. errors is estimable. In this note the special structure of the covarlance matrix of the model with the first order auto-correlated error Is derived utilizing this property, A method based on the least squares method of Frome, Kutner, and Beauchamp (1973), supplemented by steps for handling autocorrelation in studies of time series analysis, nonlinear regression, and econometrics is presented for obtaining generalized least squares estimates for the parameters of the model.     

ESTIMATING A NON-GAUSSIAN REGRESSION MODEL WITH MULTICOLLINEARITY

The paper discusses practical issues that arose in estimating a Linear model subject to heteroscedasticity, skewness and multicollinearity. The context of the problem required that linearity of the model as originally formulated be preserved. A seemingly satisfactory fit was obtained using a Gamma model and principal components.     

Double AR model without intercept: An alternative to modeling nonstationarity and heteroscedasticity

This paper presents a double AR model without intercept (DARWIN model) and provides us a new way to study the nonstationary heteroscedastic time series. It is shown that the DARWIN model is always nonstationary and heteroscedastic, and its sample properties depend on the Lyapunov exponent. An easy-to-implement estimator is proposed for the Lyapunov exponent, and it is unbiased, strongly consistent, and asymptotically normal. Based on this estimator, a powerful test is constructed for testing the ordinary oscillation of the model. Moreover, this paper proposes the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) for the DARWIN model, which has an explicit form. The strong consistency and asymptotic normality of the QMLE are established regardless of the sign of the Lyapunov exponent. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of the estimation and testing, and an empirical example is given for illustrating the usefulness of the DARWIN model.