集体林权纠纷解决的制度现状与对策研究--基于江西省某县个案的分析

化解集体林权纠纷是新一轮集体林权制度改革的重要工作,但林权纠纷解决难度大,影响了改革工作的深入开展。研究首先梳理了集体林权纠纷解决的制度安排;其次以江西省某县A、B两个村民小组因737号山场发生的林权纠纷案件作为研究对象,介绍了林权纠纷解决过程的特殊性;再次,探析了现行纠纷解决制度存在的低效问题及其成因。最后提出完善制度的顶层设计、重视非正式制度作用、加强调解机构能力建设、创新纠纷解决方法等对策建议。     

信任对农民创业机会识别的影响

基于信任视角,构建农民创业者信任对创业机会识别的理论分析框架,运用链式多重中介方法,对浙江、安徽、河南和陕西4省880份农民创业者访谈数据进行实证分析,结果发现:信任能显著提高农民创业机会识别;农民创业者信任能通过外部知识获取与创业警觉性对创业机会识别产生间接影响,其作用路径有三条:外部知识获取的部分中介作用、创业警觉性的部分中介作用及外部知识获取与创业警觉性的链式中介作用。因此,政府应完善农民创业相关规章与制度;推进农村文化建设,提高信任水平;增加农民创业知识与技能的供给,培养农民创业者的机会警觉性。     

论我国行政诉讼调解的理论革新

行政诉讼调解长期以来一直是一个莫衷一是的热点问题。在行政诉讼法即将修改之际,探讨这一问题具有重要的现实意义。文章总结了现行行政诉讼不适用调解原则的成因、困境,指出我国现行行政诉讼不适用调解原则陷入困境的理论误导的结果,并结合域外相关制度的经验,得出行政诉讼调解不仅是一种国际经验,而且应当奠定在服务行政理论基础之上才能得到正确的说明。     

"义理决狱"探析--以《名公书判清明集》为主要依据

宋代的“义理决狱”是中国古代法律儒家化运动中的一次升华,是儒家的精神和原则在司法领域内的具体体现。“义理决狱”以儒家的伦理道德作为司法审判的标准,以调解为手段,以宁人息讼为目的,在调解和息讼中都贯穿着教化的原则。     

论语言力及其心理调节功能

文章从科学发展观的角度出发,探讨语言力学里的关于语言力和心理调节之间的关系。语言力学是一个新概念。语言力可以用来调节自己或者对方的心理,并且可以用来解决人们之间的纠纷和争端。     

Parenting Disputes After Separation and Divorce: Who Needs a Family Lawyer?

Australia's family law system continues to be plagued by serious delays. This article acknowledges the need for legal interventions in post‐separation parenting disputes in which individuals may be at risk, or in cases of genuine emergency. The article next contrasts cases involving significant risk or urgency with the many ‘ordinary’ (even if sometimes complex) post‐separation disputes over parenting in which these circumstances are not present. I argue that in such cases, legal advice, legally informed dispute processes, and court hearings are remnants from earlier attitudes to separation and divorce. These interventions are expensive, frequently destructive of ongoing parental relationships, and at their heart, inappropriate for considering the needs of children. They also divert time and resources from the critical investigative and legal decision‐making processes needed in urgent or risk‐related cases. I propose that legal narratives in ‘ordinary’ post‐separation parenting disputes be replaced by narratives focused on the main drivers of these disputes, which are invariably expressed in terms of relationship difficulties. Such narratives are amenable to facilitative, therapeutic, and systemic interventions aimed at achieving self‐determined resolutions. They contrast markedly with narratives reflecting common law notion of normative resolutions derived from the application of legal precedent. Key issues in the first section of the article are then teased out via the reflections of an imaginary separated parent in an ‘ordinary,’ albeit difficult and emotionally intense, dispute about how to care for the children. In the final section, I offer brief clinical and systemic reflections on past practice and on future narratives focused on individual self‐determination.     

Museums and mining technologies

This article has a twofold purpose, first to explore how the founding of museums helps the mining industry to create a new way to look at what becomes natural in landscapes that are intervened by mining operations, and second to analyze how this new way of looking at the landscape ignites a process of recontextualization having a material impact on the territories. As part of this discussion, this article reveals how the technologies of mining production have evolved, facilitating the companies’ material production, and how the mining museum becomes a fundamental part of this technological development. This article looks at two mining museums owned or funded by the Chilean copper mine Los Pelambres, the ‘Museum of Copper and Sustainable Development’, located in Los Vilos next to Los Chungungos dock, and the ‘Andróniko Luksic Mining Center’, located in the engineering department at the Pontificia Universidad Católica in Santiago. These museums are funded by the mining company Los Pelambres and one of them is currently managed by the company.     

犯罪观的“交锋”:“刑事和解”与传统犯罪理论

“刑事和解”的出现显示了对犯罪的另一种理解可能。以传统犯罪理论为背景,以比较分析为基本路径,可以全面展现两种犯罪知识与理念的“交锋”。从宏观角度看,两者对犯罪的不同理解根源于观察路径和方法论立场的重大分歧 :传统理论着眼于“远距离观察模式”,形成了“国家中心主义”的犯罪观;而和解理论则立基于“近距离观察模式”,发展出“被害人中心主义”的犯罪观。在这样的逻辑脉络下,两者在社会危害性理论、刑事法律关系及被害人同意等问题域中,产生出辐射性的对峙与紧张。作为某种反思性的维度,“刑事和解”在侵害个人法益的犯罪中具有相当的解释力,为重新估价和改进传统犯罪理论提供了重要契机。     

对行政诉讼调解制度的冷思考

行政诉讼调解制度对当下中国的行政诉讼法发展有着不可忽视的消极作用,它将行政诉讼的目的定位为解决纠纷,淡化了行政诉讼保护相对人合法权益的目的,妨碍了行政诉讼独特的宪政功能的发挥,并导致了行政法规则在诉讼中的模糊化,使行政诉讼所承担的对行政法的告示、指引、预测、教育等作用无从发挥,行政违法的责任也随之淡化。而学界肯定行政诉讼调解制度的理由如行政裁量权的存在、中国无讼厌讼传统、外国存在相关制度等,均无法成立。由此,中国在当下不应建立行政诉讼调解制度。     

中国民间“调解法”立法模式及制定

民间调解是当代替代诉讼解决纠纷(ADR)的重要方式,是多元化纠纷解决机制(调解、仲裁、审判)的重要组成部分。针对中国目前民间调解存在立法、运行、效力不统一和不规范等问题,需要借鉴当代西方各国和地区"调解法"立法经验,选择"调解法""仲裁法""审判法"分离立法模式,制定统一的民间"调解法"。中国统一民间"调解法"的制定要解决立法目标、特有原则、调解机构和调解员、调解协议效力、民间调解法与司法调解法关系等问题。