辽宁部分高中田径选项课的现状及发展对策

采用问卷调查、专家访谈、文献资料等方法,对辽宁省重点、普通中学高中开设田径选项课的现状进行了调查分析.研究发现,当前辽宁省重点、普通高中田径选项课正面临困境.究其原因,主要是教师对田径选项课的价值认识不足;此外,当前的田径选项课缺乏趣味性,使学生产生厌学情绪.结合健康体育教育及终身体育教育,对田径选项课在中学体育课中的地位与作用进行了论述,并针对中学田径选项课的发展提出积极的对策和建议;同时,为解决高校田径选项课中的问题提供了参考与借鉴.     

信息技术在中小学体育工作中应用的实效性评价研究

随着基础教育改革的深入，信息技术在各科教学中的应用越来越普遍，体育也不例外。为了探讨和了解信息技术在中小学体育中应用的实际效果，本研究从信息技术应用于中小学体育的实效性内涵入手，对信息技术应用于中小学体育的实效性评价目标、原则、方法以及在实践中应处理的关键问题进行初步探讨，以期促进信息技术在中小学体育中的实际应用。     

Abuse of disabled children in Ghana

Even though disabled children are targets of various forms of abuse, such issues remain mostly undocumented open secrets in many countries including Ghana. The article is based on a qualitative data provided by three key informants. Six stories emerged from the data and are discussed in terms of four main forms of abuse. Labelling theories are employed to strengthen the discussions. The article is aimed at increasing awareness on the various forms of abuse experienced by disabled children in Ghana. The study is also meant to capture the attentions of stakeholders that have the responsibility to end abusive practices against disabled children in Ghana.     

对陇东学院公共体育课实施选项教学的思考

从2003年起陇东学院在公共体育课中全面实行选项课教学,使学生的个性得到了张扬,教师的专长得到了发挥,为体育教学带来了勃勃生机,从而保证了教学质量的提高,但也暴露出了许多亟待解决的问题。     

体育教学中培养学生创新能力初探

体育教学作为学校教学中极为重要的方面及内容,有着其独特的鲜明特征。从教师素质、想象能力、创新意识和创新动力等方面进行深入分析与探讨,阐述了在体育教学中培养学生创新能力的策略、措施及方法。     

Assessing participants’ perceptions on group-based principles for action in community-based health enhancing physical activity programmes: The APEF tool

In community-based health enhancing physical activity (CBHEPA) programmes, group-based principles for action such as active participation, enjoyment, and fostering group processes are widely advocated. However, not much is known about participants’ perceptions of these principles as there are no assessment tools available. Therefore, this article describes the development of the APEF (Active Participation, Enjoyment, and Fostering group processes) tool and reports on its implementation in a Dutch CBHEPA programme. Indicators for the principles have been identified from literature research, interviews with professionals, and secondary analysis of three group interviews with 11 practitioners. To address the identified indicators, the APEF tool was developed, pretested, and used in 10 focus groups with 76 participants.The APEF tool consists of eight statements about group-based principles for action, on which CBHEPA participants vote, followed by in-depth discussion. The voting procedure engages participants. Spider diagrams visualise participants’ perceptions of group-based principles.The APEF tool addresses the challenge of relating group level outcomes to individual outcomes such as physical activity behaviour. The tool facilitates as well as evaluates group-based principles for action, it stimulates dialogue and is culturally sensitive, but it needs strong facilitating skills to manage group dynamics.     

The Role of the Social Worker in Long-Term Care

Abstract

Making use of a formulation by Rosalie Kane of the ingredients necessary to “a good life” for residents of homes for the aged and other long term care facilities, the role of the social worker in insuring the presence of these ingredients is discussed. Included is an analysis of the responsibilities and tasks of the social worker which must be carried and fulfilled in order that social workers make appropriate contributions to “the good life.”     

浅议学校体育与终身体育

体育运动对于一个人乃至整个国家的重要性日益增强，终身体育是体育运动的持续发展，学校体育是实施终身体育的基本环节。为实现学校体育与终身体育的辩证统一，必须提高学校体育的教学质量。     

Association Fellows' Luncheon Address: Maintaining Purpose in a Changing Environment

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the motivational factors and the barriers to physical activity (PA) in traditional college students (TS) and nontraditional college students (NTS) and determine if differences exist between these 2 groups. Participants: A total of 746 college students; 628 were TS (19.1 ± 1.2 years), and 118 were NTS (31.2 ± 8.6 years). Methods: In fall 2010, students voluntarily completed a demographic questionnaire, Barriers to Being Active Quiz, and Exercise Motivations Inventory–2 (EMI-2). Results: EMI-2 revealed that TS and NTS differed on 8 of the 14 motivational factors for exercise. There was a significant difference between TS and NTS for the following barriers: fear of injury (p = .001), lack of resources (p = .017), and lack of skill (p = .003). Conclusion: Based on these findings, interventions can be developed for the varied needs of a diverse student population as it pertains to PA participation.