A comparison of random balance and two-stage group screening designs: A case study

In this paper we focus on the problem of supersaturated (fewer runs than factors) screening experiments. We consider two major types of designs which have been proposed in this situ¬ation: random balance and two-stage group screening. We discuss the relative merits and demerits of each strategy. In addition, we compare the performance of these strategies by means of a case study in which 100 factors are screened in 20,42,62, and 84 runs.     

Unbiased estimation following selection for bernoulli populations

Although a large number of selection procedures have been published in the statistics literature, the selection approach has received only limited use in applications. One drawback to the use of such procedures has been the lack of parameter estimates, which prevents quantitative comparisons among the treatments. To partially address this criticism, we present a general method for constructing unbiased estimators of the success probabilities after the termination of a sequential experiment involving two or more Bernoulli populations. Some theoretical properties are presented, and examples are provided for several different selection procedures.     

Multi-stage estimation of the common location parameter of several exponential distributions

The problem of constructing a confidence interval of ‘preassigned width and coverage probability’ considered by Costanza/ Hamdy and Son(1986) is further analyzed. Several multi-stage estimation procedures [ like, purely sequential, accelerated sequential and three-stage procedures ] are utilized to deal with the same estimation problem. The relative advantages and disadvantages of these procedures are discussed.     

ROBUST TESTS FOR THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ORTHANT RESTRICTED MEAN VECTOR

Mudholkar and Srivastava [1] Mudholkar, G. S. and Srivastava, D. K. A class of robust stepwise alternatives to Hotelling's T²tests. Submitted to the Journal of Applied Statistics 1999 [Google Scholar]adapted Mudholkar and Subbaiah's [2] Mudholkar, G. S. and Subbaiah, P. 1980. Testing significance of a mean vector–a possible alternative to Hotelling's T². Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 32(A): 43–52.  [Google Scholar]modified stepwise procedure, using the trimmed means in place of the means and appropriate studentization, to construct robust tests for the significance of a mean vector. They concluded that the robust alternatives provide excellent type I error control, and a substantial gain in power over Hotelling's T ²test in case of heavy tailed populations without significant loss of power when the population is normal. In this paper we adapt the modified stepwise approach to construct simple tests for the significance of the orthant constrained mean vector of a p-variate normal population with unknown covariance matrix, and also for constructing robust tests without assuming normality. The simple normal theory tests have exact type I error, whereas the robust tests provide a reasonably type I error control and substantial power advantage over Perlman's [3] Perlman, M. D. 1969. One-sided testing problems in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40: 549–567. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]likelihood ratio test.     

Estimating Process Capability Index C PM Using a Bootstrap Sequential Sampling Procedure

Construction of a confidence interval for process capability index C _PM is often based on a normal approximation with fixed sample size. In this article, we describe a different approach in constructing a fixed-width confidence interval for process capability index C _PM with a preassigned accuracy by using a combination of bootstrap and sequential sampling schemes. The optimal sample size required to achieve a preassigned confidence level is obtained using both two-stage and modified two-stage sequential procedures. The procedure developed is also validated using an extensive simulation study.     

One stage multiple comparisons of k-1 treatment mean lifetimes with the control for exponential distributions under heteroscedasticity

Abstract

In survival or reliability data analysis, it is often useful to estimate the quantiles of the lifetime distribution, such as the median time to failure. Different nonparametric methods can construct confidence intervals for the quantiles of the lifetime distributions, some of which are implemented in commonly used statistical software packages. We here investigate the performance of different interval estimation procedures under a variety of settings with different censoring schemes. Our main objectives in this paper are to (i) evaluate the performance of confidence intervals based on the transformation approach commonly used in statistical software, (ii) introduce a new density-estimation-based approach to obtain confidence intervals for survival quantiles, and (iii) compare it with the transformation approach. We provide a comprehensive comparative study and offer some useful practical recommendations based on our results. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the methodologies developed.