Efficacy Foundations for Risk Communication: How People Think About Reducing the Risks of Climate Change

Believing action to reduce the risks of climate change is both possible (self‐efficacy) and effective (response efficacy) is essential to motivate and sustain risk mitigation efforts, according to current risk communication theory. Although the public recognizes the dangers of climate change, and is deluged with lists of possible mitigative actions, little is known about public efficacy beliefs in the context of climate change. Prior efficacy studies rely on conflicting constructs and measures of efficacy, and links between efficacy and risk management actions are muddled. As a result, much remains to learn about how laypersons think about the ease and effectiveness of potential mitigative actions. To bring clarity and inform risk communication and management efforts, we investigate how people think about efficacy in the context of climate change risk management by analyzing unprompted and prompted beliefs from two national surveys (N = 405, N = 1,820). In general, respondents distinguish little between effective and ineffective climate strategies. While many respondents appreciate that reducing fossil fuel use is an effective risk mitigation strategy, overall assessments reflect persistent misconceptions about climate change causes, and uncertainties about the effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies. Our findings suggest targeting climate change risk communication and management strategies to (1) address gaps in people's existing mental models of climate action, (2) leverage existing public understanding of both potentially effective mitigation strategies and the collective action dilemma at the heart of climate change action, and (3) take into account ideologically driven reactions to behavior change and government action framed as climate action.     

基于DFA和SVR的GDP预测模型研究

首先对1980—2013年全国年度GDP数据进行消除趋势分析（DFA），发现GDP时序具有长记忆性，表明当前GDP值用来预测未来一段时间内的GDP值具有可行性，在此基础上利用具有非线性和强泛化能力特点的支持向量回归机（SVR），建立SVR预测模型,得到了较好的预测效果.     

Efficacy,Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks

A growing body of research demonstrates that believing action to reduce the risks of climate change is both possible (self‐efficacy) and effective (response efficacy) is essential to motivate and sustain risk mitigation efforts. Despite this potentially critical role of efficacy beliefs, measures and their use vary wildly in climate change risk perception and communication research, making it hard to compare and learn from efficacy studies. To address this problem and advance our understanding of efficacy beliefs, this article makes three contributions. First, we present a theoretically motivated approach to measuring climate change mitigation efficacy, in light of diverse proposed, perceived, and previously researched strategies. Second, we test this in two national survey samples (Amazon's Mechanical Turk N = 405, GfK Knowledge Panel N = 1,820), demonstrating largely coherent beliefs by level of action and discrimination between types of efficacy. Four additive efficacy scales emerge: personal self‐efficacy, personal response efficacy, government and collective self‐efficacy, and government and collective response efficacy. Third, we employ the resulting efficacy scales in mediation models to test how well efficacy beliefs predict climate change policy support, controlling for specific knowledge, risk perceptions, and ideology, and allowing for mediation by concern. Concern fully mediates the relatively strong effects of perceived risk on policy support, but only partly mediates efficacy beliefs. Stronger government and collective response efficacy beliefs and personal self‐efficacy beliefs are both directly and indirectly associated with greater support for reducing the risks of climate change, even after controlling for ideology and causal beliefs about climate change.     

Premium of Endowment Insurance for Civil Servants will be Paid by Employers and Individuals

There is finally precise information about the reform in endowment insurance to abolish the"double-track system".On December 23,2014,Mr.Ma Kai,Vice Premier of the State Council,delivered a work report on behalf of the State Council at the 12th Session of the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People’s Congress about the progress made in comprehensively advancing the establishment of urban     

《新列国志》中的“借言作断”之法

冯梦龙在《新列国志》的创制过程中，发挥《左传》“借言作断”之法：一方面，将春秋义理融入人物话语，明白显豁地反映历史真相，寄寓是非论断；一方面，借鉴《左传》中“君子曰”的模式，以髯翁、髯仙、史官、史臣等身份进行讽咏，或出以己意，或引经据典，以有诗或无诗的评论，增加内涵与意趣。他力图经史融合，藉由小说实现儒家道德伦理的大众教化，提升了列国小说的品格，确立了《新列国志》在列国小说演进过程中的典范意义。     

中国经济可持续发展与环境问题的战略性思考

1.环境整治对经济发展的影响 我们生活的地球,正面临着人口、资源、生态与环境如何协调发展的重大挑战.人口爆炸、粮食紧缺、生态破坏、环境污染、经济危机等社会问题,一个又一个的危机,不仅使人类已有的文明成果黯然失色,而且使人类的未来也越来越充满艰险.     

陕北方言的疑问句

陕北方言的疑问句和普通话的疑问句不同 ,只有是非问句、特指问句和选择问句三种 ,且结构格式也不一样。是非问句通常用类似于正反问的“体标记 否定词”格式表示 ;选择问句是在选择项之间嵌入“是”字 ,并于选项末缀体标记 ;特指问句则表现为一系列不同于普通话的特殊疑问代词的使用。同时三种问句格式在语义、语用方面也和普通话的相应形式有一些差别     

中国医疗机构定价中的问题及对策建议

医疗机构医疗服务定价需要考虑因素是医疗卫生行业管理的一个重要内容,合理有效定价对实现社会公平和福利分配,保障居民生命健康、促进社会稳定的具有重要的现实意义。本文对国内外医疗定价的几种主要模式进行简要介绍,然后分析一下我国现行医疗服务定价存在问题的原因,并给出几点改革建议,讨论需要建立一个合理的定价体系和监管体系需要考虑因素。     

Local influence analysis in the growth curve model with Rao's simple covariance structure

In this paper we discuss the likelihood-based local influence in a growth curve model with Rao's simple covariance structure. Under an abstract perturbation, the Hessian matrix is provided in which the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum absolute eigenvalue is used to assess the influence of observations. Specifically, we employ covariance-weighted perturbation to demonstrate the use of the proposed approach. A practical example is analysed using the proposed local influence approach.