Working Together to Protect Children on the Child Protection Register: Myth or Reality

Correspondence to Jan Horwath, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK. Summary Child protection guidance at a national level has predominantlyfocused on the investigation and assessment of child abuse andneglect. Post-registration practice has received little attention,resulting in a variety of local responses. This paper describesthe findings from a national study designed to identify theimpact of the lack of national guidance on local post-registrationframeworks for practice. Data collected indicate that very fewArea Child Protection Committees (ACPCs) have developed policies,procedures or practice guidance which would provide a structurefor post-registration practice. This position is aggravatedfurther as individual professionals are confused about theirown roles and responsibilities and those of colleagues. We considerthe impact of these findings on practice and conclude by suggestinga macro level framework that can be utilized by ACPCs who wishto develop practice in this area.     

The training of nursery workers: the need for a new approach

SUMMARY. This paper sets out an argument for an approach to under fives provision which ignores the boundaries between care and education. It demonstrates an example of training, at South Bank Polytechnic in London, which attempts to overcome barriers to looking at children as whole individuals     

Child Protection: Balancing Paternalism and Partnership

Correspondence to Martin C. Calder, Child Protection Unit, Salford Social Services Department, Avon House, Avon Close, Little Hulton, Manchester M38 OLA Summary There have been a great many protracted and heated debates aboutthe practice of state intervention and control of family lifein recent years. Indeed, the Children Act (1989) was draftedafter the Cleveland Inquiry highlighted the lack of consulationwith parents and the lasting effects of ill-considered intrusioninto family life, and embraced the philosophy of partnership.Social workers operating in the child care and child protectionareas need to balance the contradictory notions of paternalismand partnership, in the knowledge that they will be pilloriedby the popular press when they get it wrong. This paper attemptsto contrast the two concepts in their philosophical and socialwork contexts, and moves on to recommend frameworks for helpingto balance them when they are operationalized. It is essentialto consider this particular debate in the wider political andeconomic contexts, particularly where uncertainty and the lackof resources are ever-present features.