排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Soo Hong Chew Junjian Yi Junsen Zhang Songfa Zhong 《Journal of Risk and Uncertainty》2016,53(2-3):163-200
We estimate the effects of education on two dimensions of decision making behavior—risk and time—beyond those considered to be normal-ranged to encompass behavioral anomalies with respect to expected utility as well as time consistency. We conduct a number of incentivized choice experiments on Chinese adult twins to measure decision making behavior, and use a within-twin-pair fixed-effects estimator to deal with unobservable family-specific effects. The estimation results show that a higher education level tends to reduce the degree of risk aversion towards moderate prospects, moderate hazards, and longshot prospects. For anomalies under risk and uncertainty, college graduates exhibit significantly more Allais-type behavior compared to high school dropouts, while high school graduates exhibit more ambiguity aversion as well as a familiarity preference relative to high school dropouts. For decision making involving time, a higher education level tends to reduce the degree of impatience, and to reduce behavioral anomalies including hyperbolic discounting, dread, and hopefulness. The experimental observations suggest that people with a higher education level tend to exhibit more behavioral anomalies in risk attitudes but fewer behavioral anomalies involving time, hence implying that education has multi-functions in preference formation and human capability building. This study contributes to the understanding of the nature of these behavioral anomalies and the roles of education in human decision making. 相似文献
2.
Chark Robin Zhong Songfa Tsang Shui Ying Khor Chiea Chuen Ebstein Richard P. Xue Hong Chew Soo Hong 《Theory and Decision》2022,92(3-4):531-567
Theory and Decision - Source preference in which equally distributed risks may be valued differently has been receiving increasing attention. Using subjects recruited in Berkeley, Fox and Tversky... 相似文献
3.
It is increasingly recognized that decision making under uncertainty depends not only on probabilities, but also on psychological
factors such as ambiguity and familiarity. Using 325 Beijing subjects, we conduct a neurogenetic study of ambiguity aversion
and familiarity bias in an incentivized laboratory setting. For ambiguity aversion, 49.4% of the subjects choose to bet on
the 50–50 deck despite the unknown deck paying 20% more. For familiarity bias, 39.6% choose the bet on Beijing’s temperature
rather than the corresponding bet with Tokyo even though the latter pays 20% more. We genotype subjects for anxiety-related
candidate genes and find a serotonin transporter polymorphism being associated with familiarity bias, but not ambiguity aversion,
while the dopamine D5 receptor gene and estrogen receptor beta gene are associated with ambiguity aversion only among female
subjects. Our findings contribute to understanding of decision making under uncertainty beyond revealed preference. 相似文献
1