Policymaking in the Age of Internet: Is the Internet Tending to Make Policy Networks More or Less Inclusive?

Although many policy and political scientists have studied theInternet's role in electoral and organizational processes, thereis little work that examines the Internet's effect on policyprocesses. Has the Internet tended to make policy deliberationsmore inclusive? Has it affected patterns of influence reputationamong network participants? Has the Internet helped to bringnew organizations into policy debates? This study provides preliminaryanswers to these questions. Treating policy networks as a typeof interorganizational network, a "socialized" resource dependenceframework is developed. Deployment of the Internet is conceptualizedas an exogenous shock, where the shock alters the material resourcebase of a policy network and allows actors inside and outsidethe network to challenge structural power holders. Structuralpower holders attempt to "mold" use of the Internet to protecttheir position and its perquisites. To test this framework data were collected from two policy networksin "Newstatia"—one focused on adult basic education policyand the other on mental health policy. Both policy networksappear to have become more exclusive since the deployment ofthe Internet. Electronic central discussion networks (or "cores")were primarily populated by actors who were already entrenchedin positions of structural power within the network and possessedvery high influence ratings. Most Internet communication occursbetween members of the electronic core. At least preliminarily,the Internet appears to reinforce existing patterns of authorityand influence.