Estimating conditional tail expectation with actuarial applications in view

We develop statistical inferential tools for estimating and comparing conditional tail expectation (CTE) functions, which are of considerable interest in actuarial science. In particular, we construct estimators for the CTE functions, develop the necessary asymptotic theory for the estimators, and then use the theory for constructing confidence intervals and bands for the functions. Both parametric and non-parametric approaches are explored. Simulation studies illustrate the performance of estimators in various situations. Results are obtained under minimal assumptions, and the general Vervaat process plays a crucial role in achieving these goals.     

Robust fitting of claim severity distributions and the method of trimmed moments

Many quantities arising in non-life insurance depend on claim severity distributions, which are usually modeled assuming a parametric form. Obtaining good estimates of the quantities, therefore, reduces to having good estimates of the model parameters. However, the notion of ‘good estimate’ depends on the problem at hand. For example, the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) are efficient, but they generally lack robustness. Since outliers are common in insurance loss data, it is therefore important to have a method that allows one to balance between efficiency and robustness. Guided by this philosophy, in the present paper we suggest a general estimation method that we call the method of trimmed moments (MTM). This method is appropriate for various model-fitting situations including those for which a close fit in one or both tails of the distribution is not required. The MTM estimators can achieve various degrees of robustness, and they also allow the decision maker to easily see the actions of the estimators on the data, which makes them particularly appealing. We illustrate these features with detailed theoretical analyses and simulation studies of the MTM estimators in the case of location–scale families and several loss distributions such as lognormal and Pareto. As a further illustration, we analyze a real data set concerning hurricane damages in the United States from 1925 to 1995.     

Robust-efficient fitting of mixed linear models: Methodology and theory

In many areas of application mixed linear models serve as a popular tool for analyzing highly complex data sets. For inference about fixed effects and variance components, likelihood-based methods such as (restricted) maximum likelihood estimators, (RE)ML, are commonly pursued. However, it is well-known that these fully efficient estimators are extremely sensitive to small deviations from hypothesized normality of random components as well as to other violations of distributional assumptions. In this article, we propose a new class of robust-efficient estimators for inference in mixed linear models. The new three-step estimation procedure provides truncated generalized least squares and variance components' estimators with hard-rejection weights adaptively computed from the data. More specifically, our data re-weighting mechanism first detects and removes within-subject outliers, then identifies and discards between-subject outliers, and finally it employs maximum likelihood procedures on the “clean” data. Theoretical efficiency and robustness properties of this approach are established.