排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
In this paper we examine how leaders' perceptions of the instrumental benefits of abusive supervision shape their tendencies to abuse their employees. We posit that leaders who believe abuse has a positive impact on employee performance will engage in more abusive supervision than their peers, with downstream implications for employees' counterproductive work behaviors. Furthermore, we position leader empathic concern as a boundary condition, whereby empathic concern mitigates the effects of leaders' perceptions of abusive supervision's instrumentality. Data from two studies employing both experimental and field survey designs offer convergent support for our hypotheses. Overall, our findings challenge the prevailing view that abusive supervision is primarily motivated by a desire to aggress, instead demonstrating that leaders sometimes abuse their employees in the pursuit of more pro-organizational goals. 相似文献
2.
The union voting intention literature shows that many nonunion employees who indicate that they think unions are instrumental
in increasing wages, benefits, and working conditions would vote against forming a union. Although American workers have often been characterized as pragmatic with regard to their support for unions,
the “disconnect” between union beliefs and union voting intentions just described suggests that more subtle forces are at
work. In this paper, it is shown empirically that union instrumentality is a limited predictor of union voting intentions
for a recent national cross-section of workers. Rather, more general feelings toward unions and employers are primary. These
accounted for a large portion of the variance in union voting intentions, with general feelings towards unions by far the
most critical predictor. A concluding section discusses whether the results may reflect changes in union power and changes
in employee views of unions. Areas for future research are discussed. 相似文献
1