诗与士人的精神世界:试以王维的生命史和编年诗为例的社会学探索

费孝通先生晚年倡导面向“精神世界”的社会学研究，不仅强调了社会学的人文性格，而且指明了回溯和整理传统思想资源以理解人心的意义。古代士人在仕隐之间的进退趋避是精神世界研究的重要课题，盛唐诗人王维可作为重要个案。本文运用“知人论世”的方法，以王维的生命史、编年诗及他与其他诗人的交往为线索，考察其如何在仕隐之间调适精神世界的矛盾冲突。王维通过人际和诗文往来形成的社会交游空间、自然山水空间和灵性佛理空间，构成一个融和自然与人文的“人生圜局”，以寻求精神世界在“入世有为”和“消极退避”之间的平衡，而其精神苦痛也可以从这个圜局的层级变动或缺失中探寻根源。本文认为，把握世风民情、生命史的再现以及理解和体会的功夫，是研究士人精神世界的重要门径。     

学者型翻译家梁实秋翻译思想研究

本文通过对学者型翻译家梁实秋在与鲁迅先生的论战、莎剧翻译和莎学研究、以及对其他外国文学作品翻译和评论活动的分析,全面分析和梳理了这位学者型翻译家的翻译思想。     

关联理论与汉语形式量词短语英译

文章运用关联理论交际观,以汉语散文名篇中特有的形式量词短语及其英译为研究对象,介绍了汉语特有的形式量词短语,并根据关联理论交际观,从翻译是传递信息意图和交际意图双重目的的认知交际活动的角度来解析散文中形式量词短语及其英译技巧。试图证明关联理论交际观能够指导译者过滤汉语中有文化特异性的语言形式,从而顺利传达出原文作者的交际意图。     

跨越时空的对话——我看李清照词中的女性视角、话语与内涵

李清照的词作 ,无论是就其思想还是就其内容而言 ,都处于当时的主流文学之内 ,为时代所限 ,她本人也不具备当代女性那样强烈的自我意识。但在男性作者占绝大多数的宋代词坛上 ,李清照的女性身份及其词作的女性视角和话语 ,使她的作品具有了独特的历史价值 ,在真实地展现女性生命体验这一点上 ,又具有了不可替代的作用和另一境界。     

L'Intervention Sociologique After Twenty-Five Years: Can It Translate into English?

The sociological intervention is a research method developed in France by Alain Touraine in 1976 to explore social movement action. Since then it has undergone significant development, both in terms of the type of social experience explored and the broader research program framing it. Despite its importance, the intervention remains little known and virtually untested within English-language sociology. This article examines key dimensions of this research method through discussing several examples, and argues that the intervention has much to offer English-language sociologists concerned with questions of agency and reflexivity, relationship, narrative and experience.     

论知识分享的七大研究视角

知识分享是知识管理的重要分支.文章提出知识分享存在以"技术"为中心和以"人"为中心的两种研究范式.以这两种范式为框架,从沟通、工具、互动、学习、权力、市场和社会交换7个视角,对已有的知识分享研究进行综述;最后对知识分享研究的发展趋势进行展望,指出知识分享将从独立的以"技术"为中心的研究方式中解放,并将更加注重对个体层面和文化问题的研究.     

宋代君臣讲论《尚书》考

宋代士大夫坚持"示人主以轨范"的《尚书》观,推崇《尚书》的皇帝教育意义,并针对时弊援引、阐释《尚书》,提出皇帝治国理政必须秉持的原则和应当采取的措施,以经典和圣人的名义规范时君的行为.有些皇帝也认同"轨范"之说,或自觉而勤勉地听讲、阅读《尚书》,或借助《尚书》昭示效法圣王的决心.此外,《尚书》在宋代还被视作为臣的楷模.皇帝通过御赐、引释《尚书》等方式勉励大臣效法上古贤臣,积极劝谏、辅佐君主.皇帝和士大夫不断回溯《尚书》中唐虞三代的政治场景,由文本给予的共同回忆努力构建共同的价值,增进彼此认同,并支撑自身的合法性,共享经典文本的权威.     

移民的陌生人意象:三个社会学传统

三个重要的社会学家齐美尔、舒茨和鲍曼先后以"陌生人"为核心概念建构讨论了这一群体,阐释"陌生人"的产生机制、表现形态、当地社会的反应及由此带来的困扰,这无疑为移民研究提供了新的理论视角。而这样的理论传统是以往的移民研究所忽视的,这在一定程度上导致移民研究缺乏更为一般意义上的理论思考,缺乏对流动性这一重大社会理论议题的回应,正是在这个意义上,重新审视这样的传统是有意义的。本文的目的是对三位社会学家关于"陌生人"的论断进行评述并检视这样的论述与中国移民研究的相关性。     

Towards a transdisciplinary blueprint to studying bullying

Events related to bullying are so complex that they require a much broader examination than is usually available from a single disciplinary point of view. The purpose of the present paper is to offer new ways of examining this complex phenomenon. We will argue that transdisciplinarity (henceforth TD) could bring a more comprehensive analysis and a deeper understanding to the current state of bullying research. As a way of emphasizing the benefits of a more pluralistic and integrative approach, we will use TD based examples to describe the general context and process we used to develop a new definition of bullying, one that provides a sharper distinction between bullying and general aggression, thus offering the possibility of more targeted intervention strategies. The present paper is divided into three sections, namely, a selected review of the TD literature, an application of TD inspired ideas and tools that examine bullying from a number of interrelated perspectives, and an outline of a conceptual ‘Disciplinary Continuum’, as an example of how TD can be used to examine complex phenomena. Moreover, we will highlight TD’s expanding role in the funding process, as it is increasingly required by granting agencies and governmental ministries as a criterion for universities’ funding. We conclude by outlining ideas for further inquiries.     

When the Norwegian child-welfare services get involved: parents making sense of referrals

There is limited research exploring parents' views and understanding of referrals to the child-welfare services (CWS). This study explores parents' understanding of the circumstances leading to a child-welfare referral, and their understanding of the reporter's objectives in making the referral. Qualitative content analysis and frequency analysis was performed on open-ended survey responses from a sample of 683 Norwegian parents in contact with the CWS. The results showed that the majority (60.2%) of the parents perceived the referral to be initiated solely because of parental difficulties and multiple family life stressors. Some of the parents (22.8%) believed the referrals were initiated exclusively because of their children's problems, whereas a few (13.3%) perceived it to be a combination of parental/familial difficulties and children's problems. The findings reveal that close to half of the parents (46.4%) felt the objective of the person making the referral was to help the child, their parents and the family. Some (36.5%) saw it as a routine or mandated action by public or official services, while others (18.7%) reported that they did not know why referrals had been made, or gave no answer to the question. A small group of parents (6%) viewed the referral as an act of harassment. The main implications of these findings are discussed.