两种版本《窦娥冤》之对比评析

作为关汉卿的代表作之一,《窦娥冤》自问世以来,就受到了人们的极大关注。《窦娥冤》在两个明代刊本中的差别达到了引人注目的程度。具体而言,其体现在结构、曲文、思想、语言等几个方面。《古名家》本较为质朴自然,《元曲选》本在结构安排上更为合理、完整,文辞雅化,带有较多明人的审美取向。对于两者差异的形成,流传过程中的改动固然是重要原因,另外,也可能是版本源流不同所致。     

《生死场》的重新阅读与萧红文学史评价再阐释——对萧红文学史写作的一种思考

《生死场》作为萧红的成名作,文学史上一直被当作“抗日文学”题材的小说进行阐释。当我们重新进入《生死场》的文本世界的时候,发现了一个与所谓的文学史阐释之间的差异。在这个文本中,萧红对于女性身份过分关注,并用自己的生命体验和情感体验进行文学书写。在小说的书写过程当中,她对男性的权力话语进行了深刻的批判。因此,重新进行文本的阅读,并进而对萧红的文学史评价作新的梳理和阐释,就显得非常有意义而且有必要。     

区域微电子技术发展实力综合评价研究

本文运用模糊数学方法,建立了多层次模糊综合评判模型。并根据实际情况选用不同算子,对中国区域微电子技术发展实力进行了综合评价,为有关部门制订微电子技术区域发展政策提供了参考。     

Evaluations of Social Work Education: A Critical Review

Since the introduction in England of the social work degree in 2002, there have been a number of significant changes to social work education culminating with the implementation of the Social Work Reform Board's innovations in 2013. This article critically explores the role of evaluations of changes in social work education and their implications for social work pedagogy. Evaluations can be linked to wider trends in society such as modernity, reflexive modernity, and the audit society. These wider influences affect the use of evaluations. A way forward for social work is proposed. Social work education needs to develop a critical pedagogy of hope to transform the profession's relationship not only to evaluations but to practise as well. The key message of this article is that evaluation studies of social work education mirror the underlying tensions of late modernity. Therefore, social work education needs to adopt a critical pedagogic approach to the use of evaluation research.     

知识整合的分析框架：评价、途径与要素

信息时代的知识创造速度在不断加快，知识整合逐渐成研究的热点。当前对于知识整合研究有一个重要缺失，就是还没有形成一个统一而系统的知识整合研究框架。本文基于现有的知识整合理论，以知识整合本身作为研究的核心，归纳和提炼出知识整合研究的三个层次，即评价层、途径层、要素层；通过对各层次所包含内容的深入分析，构建了知识整合研究的理论框架；并对该框架的理论和实践指导意义进行了讨论。     

Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information System

Although many researchers have raised concerns about the lack of theoretical underpinnings for the user evaluation construct and the lack of measurement validity for specific instruments measuring it, the construct is still widely used in IS research. This paper reports on the development and measurement validity of a diagnostic tool used in recently published research to evaluate an organization's overall information systems and services. A distinctive feature of this instrument is that it is conceptually based on the task-technology fit theory in which the correspondence between information systems functionality and task requirements leads to positive user evaluations, and positive performance impacts. Specifically, the instrument development was guided by a task model of managerial decision making using recorded organizational information. This model suggested the different information systems functionalities required by users for that task, which then serve as the basis for a “task-technology fit” (TTF) instrument. The instrument thus measures the degree to which an organization's information systems and services meet the information needs of its managers. An extensive test of the measurement validity of the instrument is conducted using a sample of 357 users in 10 companies. It is found to have excellent reliability and discriminant validity for 12 dimensions of TTF, and also exhibits strong predictive validity. Finally, the instrument is compared to two other well-known user evaluation instruments. Though no single instrument can meet all needs, the instrument presented here should be considered an attractive option for researchers and practitioners seeking to measure the effectiveness of organizational information systems.     

Evidence from the field: Findings on issues related to planning,implementing and evaluating gender-based programs

An Initiative of the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ Office on Women's Health (OWH), Coalition for a Healthier Community (CHC), supports ten grantees across the U.S. in the implementation of gender-based health interventions targeting women and girls. A national evaluation is assessing whether gender-focused public health systems approaches are sustainable and cost effective in addressing health disparities in women and girls. To inform the evaluation, a systematic examination was conducted of literature in both the public and private sector designed to track, assess, understand, and improve women's health, public health systems approaches, and the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of gender-based programs. A two-person team assured the quality of the results following the review of abstracts and full-text articles. Of 123 articles meeting eligibility criteria (See inclusion criteria described in Section 2.2 below), only 18 met inclusion criteria specific to a focus on a systems approach, cost-effectiveness and/or sustainability. Studies assessing systems approaches suggested their effectiveness in changing perceptions and increasing knowledge within a community; increasing involvement of local decision-makers and other community leaders in women's health issues; and increasing community capacity to address women and girls’ health. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of gender-based approaches is needed.     

国际人口迁移理论述评

最近二三十年,由于种种原因,国家间人口迁移日益频繁,众多学者不断提出关于国际人口迁移的各种理论学说,主要涉及迁移的动力机制和后续延伸,具体包括新古典主义经济学派、新家庭经济学派、双重劳动力市场理论、世界体系理论、网络理论、机构理论和“连锁因果关系”观点等。这些理论各有所侧重,综合起来基本上可以解释复杂多样的国际人口迁移现象。不过,不免存在一定的局限性。     

Work and family: Understanding men's role evaluations

Analysis of data provided by a random sample (N=92) of married police officers was used to evaluate the effects of time constraints, job stress, family strengths, family structure, and social networks on men's role evaluations. These men had generally positive evaluations of their income provider, husband, father, and home care roles. Multivariate analysis showed complex relationships between work, family, and network conditions and men's evaluations of their roles. Commuting time, job stress, family strengths, number of children, kin available, friends available and contact with friends effected role evaluations. The centrality of family roles for these men and the patterns of personal gain they received did not support stereotypic images of men's family relationships.This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, November, 1985. I wish to thank Kuo-Liang Lin for his able assistance, and Robert A. Lewis and Fred Piercy for their helpful comments.Karen Altergott received her doctorate in Sociology from the University of Minnesota, and is currently Assistant Professor of Family Studies at Purdue University. Areas of research include family relations and social networks across the life course, comparative family studies, and family gerontology. Send correspondence to Dr. Altergott at Family Research Institute, 525 Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907.