苏联社会主义失败的根源何在?

苏联社会主义失败的根源在于政治体制问题。苏共过分重视民主的实际内容而忽视了民主的程序和形式。实践证明,没有程序和形式保障的民主发生了异化,背离了其初衷,民众的利益不可避免地受到了国家的侵犯。苏共始终作为人民的代理人管理着国家的一切,干部由党的组织部门挑选和层层任命,人民既无权选举他们,也无权监督他们,导致人民与政权长期分离。在没有民众的监督与制约下,苏共无法抵制权力的腐蚀作用,蜕变成为自身谋利益的党,干部特权制和权力私有化现象严重。苏共的执政理念也存在偏差,强国目标始终高于富民,对传统社会主义观念的忠诚始终强于对民众利益的忠诚。正因为人民无权对国家的发展施加影响,所以他们也不珍惜这样的国家,最后冷漠地注视着苏共失去政权,国家走向解体。     

从党的先进性视角解析苏共亡党教训

苏共亡党的原因很多 ,但最重要的是没有按照党的先进性来建设党 ,从而失去了它作为无产阶级先锋队的作用 ,削弱乃至丧失了执政的能力 ,最终葬送了社会主义事业 ,也葬送了党的自身。从党的先进性视角 ,解析苏共亡党的深刻教训是有借鉴意义的     

Interpellation in the late Soviet period: contesting the de-ideologization narrative

Most literature on ideology in the late Soviet period notes the progressive de-ideologization of Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) politics under Mikhail Gorbachev. Looking specifically at the legitimating functions of ideology, the article contests this generalization. In doing so, it proposes the concept of ideological interpellation to clarify the relationship between doctrine and regime legitimation. The author argues that interpellation – the construction of the ideal Soviet subject, in a way that sustained the relations of domination and production – was a consistent goal throughout the last decade of communist rule. However, while the party approached interpellation in different ways, it was unable to resolve official ideology’s rigidity and narrowness of appeal. These conclusions are supported by a discourse analysis of the 26th, 27th, and 28th CPSU congress proceedings.