论《傲慢与偏见》反讽色彩在译本中的欠额翻译

反讽可以达到戏谑、嘲弄及讽刺的效果,使作品生动幽默,富有艺术感染力。反讽在《傲慢与偏见》中塑造了鲜活的人物形象,使作品妙趣横生,令读者百读不厌。因此,成功的译文必须将其完全再现出来。然而,在阅读三个中文译本的过程中发现存在反讽的欠额翻译现象。从语言学角度分析了其原因,并给出了新的翻译建议,指出译者不仅要具备足够的源语文化和语言知识,还必须具有熟练驾驭目标语的能力,才能避免反讽的欠额翻译,达到译语读者和源语读者反应的对等。     

Is racial prejudice declining in Britain?1

This article employs two previously neglected indicators of racial prejudice from the British Social Attitudes surveys to examine the social distribution of prejudices against black and Asian Britons. Three hypotheses are proposed and tested: that racial prejudice is declining in Britain; that this decline is principally generational in nature; and that greater prejudice is shown towards more culturally distinct Asian minorities than black minorities. Strong evidence is found for the first two hypotheses, with evidence of an overall decline in prejudice and of a sharp decline in prejudices among generations who have grown up since mass black and Asian immigration began in the 1950s. Little evidence is found for the third hypothesis: British reactions towards black and Asian minorities are broadly similar suggesting racial differences may still be the main factor prompting white hostility to British minorities.     

从伽达默尔的合法偏见论看文学翻译中的创造性叛逆

西方哲学诠释学的主要代表人物伽达默尔提出了以合法偏见论为基础的哲学诠释学体系。他认为,是“合法的偏见”构成了理解的历史性因素,而理解的历史性和文本意义的开放性会不可避免地导致创造性翻译。埃斯卡皮更是明确提出,翻译就是一种创造性叛逆。好的文学翻译确实也应该是一种创造性叛逆。在翻译过程中,创造性叛逆表现为翻译主体在某种明确的再创作动机的偏见驱使下的创造性行为,表现在对原作的能动的转述和转换。当然,由于受源语和目的语中语言文化规范的双重制约,翻译的创造性叛逆并非是没有限度和范围的,而应是通过译者与文本之间的不断对话,使个人视界与历史视界达到最大程度的融合。     

论简·奥斯丁《傲慢与偏见》中的浪漫主义倾向

简.奥斯丁是19世纪著名的现实主义小说家,也是一位具有浪漫主义倾向的小说家。她在《傲慢与偏见》中,现实主义的笔法下透出了不尽的浪漫主义情怀,她运用浪漫主义的艺术形式和表现手法,塑造了许多人物,她把人物理想化,她崇尚幸福、美满的婚姻,向往自然、宁静的田园生活,这一切深刻揭示了奥斯丁及其作品的“理性其外,浪漫其中”的倾向。     

是生活,而不是罗曼史——解析《傲慢与偏见》婚恋描写的经济属性与文化特征

简·奥斯汀是一位关注生活的作家,她的《傲慢与偏见》展示了十八世纪末英国社会婚姻的状况及其实质经济问题,同时也反映出当时的文化特征,在经济与文化的联合作用下,婚姻呈现出了复杂性。     

When implicit prejudice does not predict explicit prejudice: Spanish version of the Concern with Acting Prejudiced scale / Cuando el prejuicio implícito no predice el explícito: versión española de la escala Concern with Acting Prejudiced

The aim of this research was to adapt and validate the Concern with Acting Prejudiced (CAP) scale for a Spanish sample. This measure evaluates concern about appearing prejudiced to others or oneself and the motivation not to deviate from personal egalitarian standards. First, we completed the translation and an item content validity analysis. Then, in Study 1 (N = 198), we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2 (N = 383), we conducted a confirmatory analysis of the unifactorial structure of the Spanish version of the scale and examined its validity. In Study 3 (N = 89), we explored the moderating role of participants’ concern with acting prejudiced in the relation between implicit prejudice and explicit prejudice. The results confirmed the unifactorial structure of the scale, its appropriate psychometric properties and its predictive validity. Moreover, we confirmed that the CAP moderated the relation between implicit and explicit prejudice. In participants with a low concern with acting prejudiced, implicit prejudice was positively related with modern prejudice; in participants with a high concern with acting prejudiced, these variables were not related.     

从Grice会话含义理论视角试析《傲慢与偏见》人物性格

运用Grice会话含义理论,以《傲慢与偏见》中班纳特夫妇的对话对于合作原则的遵循与违反为切入点进行分析,可以对两人截然不同的性格特征有更为全面和准确的理解,从而为语用学理论在文学文本分析中的运用提供一个实例的参照。     

"伴侣式爱情"的分析及其现实意义——《傲慢与偏见》的爱情类型理论分析

爱情类型理论是从“迈布氏个性类型”职业倾向理论演化而来的,是从心理学角度对爱情进行分类。“迈布氏个性类型”理论是对荣格的“思想／情感、感觉／直觉”的补充和完善,进而发展成十六种性格类型的组合：外向或内向型、理性或直觉型、思考或感受型、判断或意识型。后来,它成为现代心理学的分析方法,被用来分析人的各种爱情表现行为,即所谓的“爱情类型理论”。这一理论将爱情的类型分为六种形式,分别称为“伴侣式爱情”、“奉献式爱情”、“浪漫式爱情”、“游戏式爱情”、“占有式爱情”和“现实式爱情”。由于各种爱情所建立的基础不同,其过程与结果也不尽相同。《傲慢与偏见》描绘出来的爱情故事则是其多种类型的生动展示,其中,“伴侣式爱情”是最值得追求的,它是一种温馨、长久的爱情。在现代社会中它仍享有很高的地位,对人的自我完善具有一定的价值。     

论《傲慢与偏见》中人物的女性魅力

英国女作家简·奥斯丁创作的长篇小说《傲慢与偏见》是一部广受欢迎的经典之作。它成功塑造了两个新女性形象伊丽莎白和吉英。她们两人都有着与当时社会背景不相符的女性意识,对当时社会上女性的地位与待遇进行了深刻的揭露与无情的抨击,从而揭示出作家本人作为女性作家的独有观点,即对于男权社会中女性所遭受的不平等遭遇进行了勇敢的反抗,是具有反叛精神的新女性,让小说中的女性人物形象展现出不一样的女性魅力。     

Anti-Semitism and Identification of Jewish Group Membership from Photographs

Early literature found that holding more anti-Semitic attitudes positively predicted ability to discern whether a photograph was of a Jewish or non-Jewish person. This contradicts the well established finding that interpersonal sensitivity is generally associated with healthy psychological characteristics. In five new, previously unpublished studies we found that this relation was negative, such that more prejudiced individuals were now less accurate than less prejudiced individuals at a similar task, consistent with the general finding. A meta-analysis of all the studies showed that time was a significant moderator of the relation. Possible reasons for the temporal change are discussed.