民问：从破碎到沉潜——赵树理小说的一种解读

赵树理的小说,表现了中国北方农村从20世纪30年代到60年代的历史变迁,战争、革命和社会主义运动是文本的基本框架。但在历史的波涛和底层中,又隐含着一个广大的、复杂的民间社会和一种民间文化形态。作家坚定地站在民间立场,逼真而深刻地描绘了民间世界从破碎到沉潜的悲剧命运,从中也折射出赵树理从“辉煌”到“末路”的人生轨迹。     

Managing cohesion in transnational organizations: an introduction

Aesthetic approaches seek to enrich knowledge about the ‘sensible’ aspects of experience. The ‘aesthetic dimension’ of shipboard organizational life is evoked and co‐created through multiple aesthetic categories such as the agogic, the sacred, and the sublime rendered through multiple sensory experiences of life aboard. A researcher and sailor‐informant co‐authored aesthetic reading contributes to a growing niche of aesthetic‐based research within organization studies. Our article explores collaboration as an important element of the aesthetic project. Possibilities for future aesthetic inquiries are also considered.     

《史记》未著录《淮南子》原因及作者问题考论

<淮南子>撰成于汉文帝末期,刘安综括其要题名<鸿烈>,因武帝严加禁锢,太史令司马迁也未能一睹该书之宏观.东汉刘向校订石室书籍时,取名<淮南>,东汉人题名<淮南子>、<刘安子>,唐宋之际又名<淮南鸿烈>.相关文献证明,<鸿烈>的作者自东汉以来,普遍认为除刘安外,另有道家苏飞等八公及儒家大、小山等人,及赵贤、朱骄如两位兵家和九位精通<易>学的宾客.     

《刘子》作者新证

《刘子》作者究竟为谁，自唐迄今，众说纷纭，莫衷一是。因其涉及《文心雕龙》的作者刘勰，故弄清事实真相不仅对《刘子》的研究十分重要，而且对“龙学”的研究也具有特殊意义。通过爬梳史料，原始以要终，辨析考证，认为《刘子》作者乃梁朝之刘遵。     

《神女赋》的作者归属问题探讨

对于《神女赋》的作者归属问题众说纷纭,或言张华,或言张敏,本文针对今人马鸿雁《张华集校注》将《神女赋》归入张华集而作,立足于《神女赋》之文本,重点从思想内容和表达方式两个方面着手,通过与张华、张敏诸作进行比较研究,认为将《神女赋》归于张敏著作更为妥帖。     

Proposed best practice for statisticians in the reporting and publication of pharmaceutical industry‐sponsored clinical trials

In this paper we set out what we consider to be a set of best practices for statisticians in the reporting of pharmaceutical industry‐sponsored clinical trials. We make eight recommendations covering: author responsibilities and recognition; publication timing; conflicts of interest; freedom to act; full author access to data; trial registration and independent review. These recommendations are made in the context of the prominent role played by statisticians in the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of pharmaceutical sponsored trials and the perception of the reporting of these trials in the wider community. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

论中国古代文论中的天赋论

天赋论是中国古代文论作家论中的重要内容,是中国古代文人有鉴于文学创作的主体特性而提出来的理论,这种天才论以文气论为基础,强调文艺家的先天禀赋是决定创作成功的先决条件.在天赋论发展过程中,才与德、先天与后天修养问题一直存在着尖锐的对立与冲突,传统儒家重德轻才,推崇后天修养而轻视先天才华,以一种唯道德的标准去论文,往往扼杀了作家的才华与作品的价值,不利于对作家的创作才华与作品作出全面的评价.     

试谈谈Forensic Linguistics

ForensicLinguistics是近年来新兴的一门边缘学科，受到语言学家、律师，公安、检察和法院等部门越来越大的关注。本文旨在通过对它的初探以引起更广泛的关注和更深入的研究。在前言部分，作者对该学科的中文译名提出了自己的看法并明确了法语言学的研究对象。文章的第一部分主要介绍了这门学科兴起的背景。第二部分讨论了该学科的应用范围及主要研究方法，着重对声音辨认和作者鉴别中存在的问题作了分析。文章最后提出了解决问题的意见。     

Analysis and Implications of Retraction Period and Coauthorship of Fraudulent Publications

Studies have indicated that the number and frequency of fraudulent publications being retracted are not subsiding even with greater awareness of such incidents in the recent decades. In this study, the trends of retraction period, number of citations and coauthors of 5 selected researchers who had ≥ 15 fraudulent publications retracted were analyzed. The obtained results shows that the retraction period is 48.96 ± 32.16 months for the 113 publications affiliated to the 5 studied researchers. There are a total of 180 coauthors with 6.40 ± 3.26 coauthors per researcher's retracted publication. The linear regression analysis indicates that there is limited correlation (R² = .008) between the citation counts and retraction period. The p value for multiple F-tests to assess the number of coauthors to a fraudulent publication on an interresearcher basis is found to be ranging from < .001 to .458. It is also found that a better correlation (R² = .592) exists between the likelihood of a researcher to involve different individuals for isolated fraudulent publications while only selecting very few to be their frequent coauthors of their mischievous acts. With this study, the possible use of coauthors as a strategy for publishing fraudulent work and a potential approach to tighten coauthorship are discussed.     

《旗亭记》作者考辨

清刻本《旗亭记》以"雅雨堂两种曲"名义刊行,卷首未署名,因此其作者归属颇具争议。勾稽史籍、文集、笔记等并深入考辨后可知《旗亭记》原为金兆燕所作,后经卢见曾润色删改。《旗亭记》在作者归属上的争议,反映了清人著作权意识淡漠的普遍现象,而幕主与幕宾社会、经济地位不对等的主从关系,则是著作权发生争议的关键所在。