朱熹和孟子解读舜之“怨慕”的不同逻辑

对于舜之“怨慕”,朱熹作出了不同于孟子的解读。这是基于心学、理学内在逻辑的不同。孟子作为私学之儒,和孔子一样,是主张士君子的阳刚人格的,并且从性向善的人性论出发,协调义与利、公与私的关系,而以君臣父子关系都属对待关系;依此,将舜之“怨慕”解读为舜对父母的既怨又慕。朱熹则作为官学之儒,以所谓“气质之性”协调理学先驱荀子的性向恶论,以二歧化思维把天地之性、天理绝对化,以公去私,视君臣父子关系则为下对上的绝对服从关系;依此解读,舜之“怨”只能是自怨。     

网络怨恨的价值位移——基于舍勒现象学的分析

当前网络表达中到处弥漫的怨恨情绪,使技术理性的价值产生位移或曰颠覆,正价值如正义、公平、为承认而斗争等,在怨恨的情绪及其网络表达中导向负价值:网络暴政、人的主体性的消解,使人陷入"单向度的人"的危险。当下网络表达的无序和失序,正是怨恨的现象学呈现。因而,透过现象学观察的怨恨及其网络表达,或许可为我们反思批判当下和建构新的网络伦理提供一个新的思路。     

怨恨论——从尼采到舍勒

尼采提出＂基督教的爱理念＂为最精巧的＂怨恨之花＂的断言,舍勒承接并驳斥该断言,提出现代仁爱才是真正的奴隶道德的起义。分析并比较两位哲人的怨恨论,他们对怨恨情感造成价值位移这一看法是一致的,该问题上的分歧在于对怨恨所颠覆的对象作出不同判断,这一分歧源于他们各自对于生命及生命价值的不同理解。     

新生代农民工社会情绪的危害与对策

新生代农民工是我国产业工人群体的重要组成部分,由于体制和制度等原因,新生代农民工不满情绪压抑在内心深处,形成怨恨。造成新生代农民工怨恨感的原因是多方面的：从社会分层理论看,新生代农民工属于社会下层;从社会身份理论看,新生代农民工属于“边缘人”;从社会交往理论看,新生代农民工仍是初级交往为主;从受教育程度看,新生代农民工文化水平普遍较低。怨恨感的压抑会带来一系列的社会危害：伤害农民工自我心灵,阻碍社会进步;引起农民工思想混乱,导致群体性事件的发生;降低政府公信力,削弱社会的整合能力和动员能力。在此提出化解农民工怨恨感的对策建议：提升农民工的社会政治地位,加强对新生代农民工的人文关怀;进一步提高农民工的工资待遇,切实保障其合法权益;完善农民工就业培训,增强其社会竞争力。     

集体行动发生的三种解释路径及其简评

运用比较法,对集体行动发生的原因从三个方面进行了探讨：一是社会心理学解释,强调集体心理、怨恨和剥夺感等心理因素;二是社会结构解释,重视阶级结构、社会变迁和国家控制能力等因素;三是理性选择解释,认为行动者的理性判断、制度和组织对集体行动的影响。     

屈原骚怨心境剖析

屈原骚怨心境的生成源于"信而见疑,忠而被谤"的处境,其"骚(忧)"有二:得不到国君信任之"忧",找不到志同道合者之"忧";其"怨"亦有二:楚王昏聩之"怨",群小谗陷之"怨"。诗人以神话思维方式,运用多种艺术手段抒写内心的骚怨情怀,这种思维方式的运用与诗人所生活的楚地盛行巫风、巫文化有关。骚怨心境驱使诗人进行审美创造活动,诗人的骚怨心境在审美创造活动中得以宣泄。     

曹丕"清怨"诗风的源与流

本文从文本形态、社会风尚、诗歌美学等角度分析了曹丕诗歌的“清”“怨”诗风,并对汉魏之际“清”“怨”诗风的形成进行了论述,理顺了“清怨”诗风的渊源和发展。     

边疆民族地区网络舆情危机中的社会怨恨情绪研究

社会怨恨是在社会转型中一种带有攻击性和反社会性的负面情绪体验,其爆发主要经历了触发、发酵、扩散及带来不可预期后果等阶段。在边疆民族地区社会转型过程中,部分民众可能因利益结构、权利结构、权力结构及信息结构的失衡将主观体验到的被剥夺感、被歧视感、不公平感以及生存性焦虑感等转化为社会怨恨情绪,并通过网络等新媒体进行非制度性表达,酿成网络舆情危机。因此,边疆民族地区各级政府应高度重视这部分民众的社会怨恨情绪,畅通利益表达机制,理性回应他们的诉求,切实维护社会公平正义,从而维护边疆民族地区的社会稳定。     

Fragmented Sisters? The Implications of Flexible Working Policies for Professional Women's Workplace Relationships

Much is being done by governments and organizations to help workers reconcile their family and employment responsibilities. One such measure has been the introduction of flexible working policies. While academic and policy debates focus on the barriers to flexible working, less consideration is paid to those who work alongside flexible workers. Through a gendered lens, this article focuses on professional women and explores the implications of UK flexible working policies for women's workplace relations in organizations that have traditionally been based on male models of working. Drawing on interviews conducted in three English organizations, it was found that the women's interests did not always coincide and that their social relationships, with respect to flexible working, involved both support and resentment. In particular, the women's interests were affected by organizational and job‐related factors and their stage in the life course. These findings illuminate the ways in which policies are negotiated at the level of daily workplace life and show that co‐workers are a pivotal part of the wider picture of flexible working.     

Do Stepparents Experience More Parental Antagonism Than Biological Parents? A Test of Evolutionary and Socialization Perspectives

Research regarding the affective experiences of stepparents is sparse. This study investigated the relationship between parental type (step or biological) and parental socioemotional investment, resentment, and jealousy. The study explored whether evolutionary or socialization accounts of parenting were able to explain the differential treatment of step and biological children. The pattern of findings—that stepparents generally exhibit lower parental socioemotional investment and higher parental resentment and parental jealousy than biological parents—suggests that stepparental antagonism might be due to differences in innate motivations of step and biological parents. Implications for research, theory, and practice are discussed.