运用精神分析理论分析《化身博士》中的人格分裂

英国作家史蒂文森的代表作《化身博士》描写了一个人格分裂的博士的故事,背后隐藏的缘由可以用弗洛伊德的精神分析理论加以分析。通过这种分析,可以帮助现代人了解人格的构成和特性,帮助现代人培养完美的人格。     

《化身博士》的两性解读

本文在文化语境、性别语境和家庭语境的框架下,结合史蒂文森的个人生活和社会经历,挖掘《化身博士》这部小说是如何隐晦地表现女性元素,进而对作品进行一个两性视角的文本解读。指出这部小说为读者提供了一个女性、男性和人性问题的维多利亚全景。     

Expressive Free Speech,the State and the Public Sphere: A Bakhtinian–Deleuzian Analysis of ‘Public Address’ at Hyde Park

In this paper I explore how struggles around free speech between social movements and the state are often underpinned by a deeper struggle around expressive images of what counts as either ‘decent’ or ‘indecent’ discussion. These points are developed by exploring what is arguably the most famous populist place for free speech in Britain, namely Hyde Park. In 1872 the state introduced the Parks Regulation Act in order to regulate, amongst other things, populist uses of free speech at Hyde Park. However, although the 1872 Act designated a site in Hyde Park for public meetings, it did not mention ‘free speech’. Rather, the 1872 Act legally enforced the liberty to make a ‘public address’ and this was implicitly contrasted by the state of an expressive image of ‘indecent’ speakers exercising their ‘right’ of free speech at Hyde Park. Once constructed, the humiliating image of ‘indecent’ free speech could then be used by the state to regulate actual utterances of public speakers at Hyde Park. But the paper shows how in the years immediately following 1872 a battle was fought out in Hyde Park over the expressive image of public address between the state and regulars using Hyde Park as a public sphere to exercise free speech. For its part the state had to engage in meaningful deliberative forms of discussion within its own regulatory framework and with the public sphere at Hyde Park in order to maintain the legal form, content and expression of the 1872 Act. To draw out the implications of these points I employ some of the theoretical ideas of the Bakhtin Circle and Gilles Deleuze. Each set of thinkers in their own way make valuable contributions for understanding the relationship between the state, public sphere and expressive images.