Goodness—of—fit for the two—parameter weibull distribution with estimated parameters

Goodness—of—fit statistics based on the empirical distribution function (EDF) are not distribution—free when parameters for the hypothesized distribution are estimated. Tables are percentile values of several EDF statistics are available for the two—parameter Weibull distribution when parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood. To determine how these tabled values change when simpler estimators are employed, percentile scores for EDF goodness—of—fit tests were obtained by Monte—Carlo simulation for maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), good linear unbiased estimators (GLUEs), and modified Cramer—von Mises, Anderson—Darling, and Watson statistics are presented for GLUEs for both complete and censored samples. Critical values for Kolmogorov—Smirnov statistics were less affected by the method of estimation than were closer for MLEs and MGLUEs than for MGLUEs and GLUEs. On the other hand, MGLUE and GLUE results were much more similar to each other than to the MLE results when censoring was light and sample sizes were large.     

Likelihood ratio tests for multivariate normality

This paper presents some powerful omnibus tests for multivariate normality based on the likelihood ratio and the characterizations of the multivariate normal distribution. The power of the proposed tests is studied against various alternatives via Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation studies show our tests compare well with other powerful tests including multivariate versions of the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Anderson–Darling test.     

Opportunities of the minimum Anderson–Darling estimator as a variant of the maximum likelihood method

We reveal that the minimum Anderson–Darling (MAD) estimator is a variant of the maximum likelihood method. Furthermore, it is shown that the MAD estimator offers excellent opportunities for parameter estimation if there is no explicit formulation for the distribution model. The computation time for the MAD estimator with approximated cumulative distribution function is much shorter than that of the classical maximum likelihood method with approximated probability density function. Additionally, we research the performance of the MAD estimator for the generalized Pareto distribution and demonstrate a further advantage of the MAD estimator with an issue of seismic hazard analysis.     

An Empirical Analysis of Some Nonparametric Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Censored Data

In this article, we consider some nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for right censored samples, viz., the modified Kolmogorov, Cramer–von Mises–Smirnov, Anderson–Darling, and Nikulin–Rao–Robson χ² tests. We also consider an approach based on a transformation of the original censored sample to a complete one and the subsequent application of classical goodness-of-fit tests to the pseudo-complete sample. We then compare these tests in terms of power in the case of Type II censored data along with the power of the Neyman–Pearson test, and draw some conclusions. Finally, we present an illustrative example.     

Four tests of fit for the beta-binomial distribution

Tests based on the Anderson–Darling statistic, a third moment statistic and the classical Pearson–Fisher X ² statistic, along with its third-order component, are considered. A small critical value and power study are given. Some examples illustrate important applications.     

The Statistical Analysis of Preference Data

A new statistic and a new method of analysis are proposed for data where a sample of respondents provides a preference ordering of some treatments. The new preference statistic is compared with the Friedman statistic, particularly for an example where 12 home owners each ranked four grasses. The new analysis provides a more natural and less misleading assessment of where the differences occur than an analysis based on the rank sums of the Friedman statistic. The new analysis is also more robust to deviations from the classical location problem, is not related to election methods known to have undesirable characteristics and adheres to the Condorcet criterion for election methods.     

穿越时空的理论旅行——评佩里·安德森力作《思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右》

作为英国当代著名的马克思主义理论家、思想史家和西方左翼理论家,佩里.安德森在其著作《思想的谱系——西方思潮左与右》中,对当代西方思想界左中右三翼的主要代表人物及作品进行了批判性解读:既有对右翼的辛辣批评,又有对中左翼思想和学术肯定之下的遗憾。这些理论评说,正是佩里.安德森的个性和学术风格的必然体现。然笔战之余,亦有佩里.安德森对《伦敦书评》的回忆和自己对父亲的深切怀念,其文笔之优美和感情之细腻,在佩氏其他学术著述中是难得一见的。     

A density-based empirical likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit test for the Rayleigh distribution and power comparison

The Rayleigh distribution has been used to model right skewed data. Rayleigh [On the resultant of a large number of vibrations of the some pitch and of arbitrary phase. Philos Mag. 1880;10:73–78] derived it from the amplitude of sound resulting from many important sources. In this paper, a new goodness-of-fit test for the Rayleigh distribution is proposed. This test is based on the empirical likelihood ratio methodology proposed by Vexler and Gurevich [Empirical likelihood ratios applied to goodness-of-fit tests based on sample entropy. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54:531–545]. Consistency of the proposed test is derived. It is shown that the distribution of the proposed test does not depend on scale parameter. Critical values of the test statistic are computed, through a simulation study. A Monte Carlo study for the power of the proposed test is carried out under various alternatives. The performance of the test is compared with some well-known competing tests. Finally, an illustrative example is presented and analysed.     

Goodness of fit test for the generalized Rayleigh distribution with unknown parameters

The use of goodness-of-fit test based on Anderson–Darling (AD) statistic is discussed, with reference to the composite hypothesis that a sample of observations comes from a generalized Rayleigh distribution whose parameters are unspecified. Monte Carlo simulation studies were performed to calculate the critical values for AD test. These critical values are then used for testing whether a set of observations follows a generalized Rayleigh distribution when the scale and shape parameters are unspecified and are estimated from the sample. Functional relationship between the critical values of AD is also examined for each shape parameter (α), sample size (n) and significance level (γ). The power study is performed with the hypothesized generalized Rayleigh against alternate distributions.     

Maximum likelihood vs. maximum goodness of fit estimation of the three-parameter Weibull distribution

The use of statistics based on the empirical distribution function is analysed for estimation of the scale, shape, and location parameters of the three-parameter Weibull distribution. The resulting maximum goodness of fit (MGF) estimators are compared with their maximum likelihood counterparts. In addition to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer–von Mises, and Anderson–Darling statistics, some related empirical distribution function statistics using different weight functions are considered. The results show that the MGF estimators of the scale and shape parameters are usually more efficient than the maximum likelihood estimators when the shape parameter is smaller than 2, particularly if the sample size is large.