Decision-Making Criteria in Child Custody Disputes That Involve Requests for Overnight Visits with Infants and Toddlers: Derived from a Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT

The court, child custody evaluators, and mediators are often faced with difficult decisions regarding how to best meet the needs of children from families who are involved in child custody disputes. In some cases, the court, child custody evaluators and mediators are asked to make decisions about parenting plans for infants and toddlers. When decision makers are faced with actual cases, they are likely to be assisted by lines of inquiry that help them gather the most relevant data to answer the question at hand. A review of the literature has led to the development of 13 criteria that decision makers can use to reach conclusions about whether overnight visits would be advisable with a given infant or toddler. The criteria are considered neutral and are not based on any bias or preconceived opinion about whether overnights with infants and toddlers are or are not advisable. Instead, the criteria proposed provide the decision-maker with an objective way of structuring their thinking about a particular case to insure that all pertinent information has been considered before reaching a conclusion about whether overnight visitation is in the best interest of a given child.     

Parental Gatekeeping and Child Custody Evaluation: Part III: Protective Gatekeeping and the Overnights “Conundrum”

ABSTRACT

The concept of parental gatekeeping and the forensic evaluation model for child custody disputes is described and applied to the context of considering overnight care by fathers for infants and toddlers. The forensic model is briefly described: facilitative, restrictive, and protective gatekeeping. The gatekeeping continuum is described, ranging from extreme restrictive to very facilitative and inclusive. Gatekeeping is isomorphic with a common best interest statutory factor on support for the other parent–child relationships. The limited research on overnights and child outcomes is briefly reviewed and discussed in the context of attachment theory. The concept of social capital is introduced as an explanatory concept for research that shows the benefit of joint parental involvement and shared parenting, including overnight care by fathers. Attachment and social capital are presented as complementary, explanatory concepts for understanding the gatekeeping and overnights issues. The conservative school of thought on overnight care by fathers is discussed in terms of a justification analysis as part of the gatekeeping model. Mothers opposing overnights need to show with behavioral specificity how overnights would be harmful to the child and then how the father can still be afforded substantial involvement in the present and future.