排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
胡可先 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》1993,5(3):64
魏晋南北朝至隋唐五代的中古时期,墓志铭在发展演变过程中呈现出完备的文体形态,形成了特定的书写规则。首先,中古墓志铭是由多重载体构成的特殊体制,至少存在文本、书法与实物三重载体。其次,中古墓志铭的文体特征表现为志铭分撰现象更加凸显,墓志与诗体进一步交融,铭文的体式逐渐丰富。再者,唐代墓志铭的书写规则主要有逐步完备的题款、偶尔出现的注文、特殊的平阙格式。最后,墓志铭的集本与石本文字书写方式有所不同,比较集本与石本,更有助于我们把握墓志铭的文体特质。 相似文献
2.
Comparing the efficacy of electronic-tablet to paper-based surveys for on-site survey administration
Kendyl Hassler Thomas L. Serfass 《International Journal of Social Research Methodology》2018,21(4):487-497
This study compares cost, completion times, and percent completion of electronic tablet (n = 244) to paper-based (n = 398) questionnaires administered to participants of scenic raft trips on the Snake River, Grand Teton National Park. We hypothesized e-tablet questionnaires would (1) cost less (2) be completed faster and (3) be completely filled more frequently than paper-based questionnaires. Our survey resulted in a greater per unit cost of e-tablet compared to paper-based questionnaires ($4.17 and $1.80, respectively). Although e-tablets were completed faster (230 [±66] s) than paper questionnaires (235 [±57] s), the difference was not significant (t(641) = 1.97, p = 0.39). E-tablets were filled completely more frequently than paper questionnaires (80% vs. 51%, respectively; χ2 = 3.84, p < 0.01). We suggest that for multi-year projects with a sample size target of ≥100, and length ≥ 5 pages, e-tablets are more cost effective and efficient than paper-based surveys. 相似文献
1