Sample Size and Power Calculations for Left-Truncated Normal Distribution

Abstract

Sample size calculation is an important component in designing an experiment or a survey. In a wide variety of fields—including management science, insurance, and biological and medical science—truncated normal distributions are encountered in many applications. However, the sample size required for the left-truncated normal distribution has not been investigated, because the distribution of the sample mean from the left-truncated normal distribution is complex and difficult to obtain. This paper compares an ad hoc approach to two newly proposed methods based on the Central Limit Theorem and on a high degree saddlepoint approximation for calculating the required sample size with the prespecified power. As shown by use of simulations and an example of health insurance cost in China, the ad hoc approach underestimates the sample size required to achieve prespecified power. The method based on the high degree saddlepoint approximation provides valid sample size and power calculations, and it performs better than the Central Limit Theorem. When the sample size is not too small, the Central Limit Theorem also provides a valid, but relatively simple tool to approximate that sample size.     

A General Class of Test Procedures for Left-Truncated and Right-Censored Data

When the distribution of one of the characteristics of a process is non normal, methods based on empirical percentiles suggest the use of several process capability indices (PCIs) which are similar to the usual C _p , C _pk , C _pm , and C _pmk indices. However most of these PCIs apply only to the case of symmetrical tolerances. To take into account the asymmetry of the tolerances as well as the asymmetry of the process distribution, new PCIs which improve the previous ones are proposed. In the end and in order to validate the method proposed here, we apply it to a real production case.     

Estimation of percentile residual life function with left-truncated and right-censored data

This article focuses on the estimation of percentile residual life function with left-truncated and right-censored data. Asymptotic normality and a pointwise confidence interval that does not require estimating the unknown underlying distribution function of the proposed empirical estimator are obtained. Some simulation studies and a real data example are used to illustrate our results.     

On left-truncating and mixing Poisson distributions

ABSTRACT

The distributions obtained by left-truncating at k a mixed Poisson distribution, denoted kT-MP, and those obtained by mixing previously left-truncated Poisson distributions, denoted M-kTP, are characterized by means of their probability generating function. The main consequence is that every kT-MP distribution is a M-kTP distribution, but not the other way around.     

Linear transformation models for survival analysis with tumor growth information in cancer screening study

The complication in analyzing tumor data is that the tumors detected in a screening program tend to be slowly progressive tumors, which is the so-called left-truncated sampling that is inherent in screening studies. Under the assumption that all subjects have the same tumor growth function, Ghosh (2008 Ghosh, D. (2008). Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies. Biometrics 64:141–148.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) developed estimation procedures for the Cox proportional hazards model. Shen (2011a Shen, P.-S. (2011a). Proportional hazards regression for cancer screening data. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 18:367–377.[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) demonstrated that Ghosh (2008 Ghosh, D. (2008). Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies. Biometrics 64:141–148.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])'s approach can be extended to the case when each subject has a specific growth function. In this article, under linear transformation model, we present a general framework to the analysis of data from cancer screening studies. We developed estimation procedures under linear transformation model, which includes Cox's model as a special case. A simulation study is conducted to demonstrate the potential usefulness of the proposed estimators.     

Bayesian analysis of the Box-Cox transformation model based on left-truncated and right-censored data

In this paper, we discuss the inference problem about the Box-Cox transformation model when one faces left-truncated and right-censored data, which often occur in studies, for example, involving the cross-sectional sampling scheme. It is well-known that the Box-Cox transformation model includes many commonly used models as special cases such as the proportional hazards model and the additive hazards model. For inference, a Bayesian estimation approach is proposed and in the method, the piecewise function is used to approximate the baseline hazards function. Also the conditional marginal prior, whose marginal part is free of any constraints, is employed to deal with many computational challenges caused by the constraints on the parameters, and a MCMC sampling procedure is developed. A simulation study is conducted to assess the finite sample performance of the proposed method and indicates that it works well for practical situations. We apply the approach to a set of data arising from a retirement center.     

Comparison of Several Confidence Intervals for Median Residual Lifetime with Left-truncated and Right-censored Data

For left-truncated and right-censored data, the technique proposed by Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) is extended to construct a point-wise confidence interval for median residual lifetime. This procedure is computationally simpler than the score type confidence interval in Jeong et al. (2008) and empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval in Zhou and Jeong (2011). Further, transformations of the estimator are applied to improve the approximation to the asymptotic distribution for small sample sizes. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the accuracy of these confidence intervals and the implementation of these confidence intervals to two real datasets is illustrated.