多元视野中幸福理论及其对主观生活质量研究的现实意义

生活质量意义上的幸福研究代表了当代幸福研究的重要取向,生活质量包括主观生活质量和客观生活质量两个部分,与主观生活质量密切相关的是主观幸福感。研究一个国家人民的生活质量,会在不同程度上涉及到主观幸福感测量问题。主观生活质量测量力图对主观幸福感调查建立起科学而严格的标准,使得幸福测量具有稳定性、可信性和有效性。     

子代情感支持选择对农村老年妇女主观幸福感的影响——基于安徽省的问卷调查分析

根据2011年“安徽省老年妇女养老问题农村地区调查”数据,应用Logistic回归方法,对农村地区老年妇女在情感支持方面不同子代角色的选择对其主观幸福感的影响进行了分析研究.研究结果显示:在情感支持方面选择儿媳和女儿的农村老年妇女主观幸福感发生比较高,选择儿子和女婿的则对其主观幸福感有负面影响.     

新媒体使用对主观幸福感的影响——基于深度访谈的质化研究

社会科学中对幸福感的研究多从心理学、社会学和伦理学学科视角出发,从传播学角度直接论述媒介使用对主观幸福感的影响的研究较少。通过深度访谈和焦点小组讨论等质化研究方法,考察了大众传播的媒介使用对使用者主观幸福感的影响。研究发现,媒介使用通过三种路径影响主观幸福感:人们通过媒介内容(信息)的主动使用与满足直接影响其主观幸福感;媒介作为中介变量能使大学生构建更广阔的主观现实(subjective-reality),通过参照系对比和后续行为,进而与主观幸福感发生勾连;大众传播媒介通过如"地方认同"、"国家认同"等象征性资源,整合社会凝聚力,人们的"认同"感知的变化会隐性地影响其主观幸福感。     

90后女大学生的婚姻态度与主观幸福感的关系研究

为了了解90后女大学生婚姻态度和主观幸福感的现状,揭示90后女大学生婚姻态度与主观幸福感之间的关系,采用婚姻态度量表和总体幸福感量表,对商洛学院和陕西学前师范学院在校的大一、大二、大三的320名女大学生进行调查。结果表明：（1）90后女大学生婚姻态度在父母感情上存在显著差异,但在学校、年级、恋爱经历、生源地、是否独生女和学科背景上不存在显著差异;（2）90后女大学生主观幸福感在年级和是否独生女上存在显著差异,但在学校、恋爱经历、生源地、学科背景和父母感情上不存在显著差异;（3）90后女大学生婚姻态度与主观幸福感呈显著正相关;（4）婚姻态度对主观幸福感具有预测作用。结论：婚姻态度是主观幸福感的影响因素。     

Perspectives on determinants of social welfare: introduction

In this commentary we discuss and elaborate on a number of topics that have been raised in the articles in this issue. The first topic treated is causality. All scientists are aware of the difficulties of making causal inferences in non‐experimental settings, and in many cases arguments are forwarded that support the causal interpretation of the reported relationships. Questions of bi‐directional causality, nonlinear relationships and the importance of omitted variables are discussed, as is the supporting evidence that in some cases comes from experimental studies. The second topic is the level of analysis employed in the empirical analyses and the difficulty of interpreting findings at a different level of aggregation than the level applied in these analyses. In this context, the importance of applying a person‐orientation is pointed out to ensure that the findings are interpretable at the level of the single individual. Even in individual‐level analyses, this can be problematic if one relies on group statistics produced within a variable‐oriented framework. The third topic concerns how to handle interactions and nonlinear relationships. The fourth topic concerns the importance of improving measurements so that a good correspondence is achieved between them and the theoretical conceptualisations. The fifth and last topic is concerned with the argument that different ways of investigating the generalisability of the results to different populations should be tried.     

Perspectives on determinants of social welfare: commentary

In this commentary we discuss and elaborate on a number of topics that have been raised in the articles in this issue. The first topic treated is causality. All scientists are aware of the difficulties of making causal inferences in non-experimental settings, and in many cases arguments are forwarded that support the causal interpretation of the reported relationships. Questions of bi-directional causality, nonlinear relationships and the importance of omitted variables are discussed, as is the supporting evidence that in some cases comes from experimental studies. The second topic is the level of analysis employed in the empirical analyses and the difficulty of interpreting findings at a different level of aggregation than the level applied in these analyses. In this context, the importance of applying a person-orientation is pointed out to ensure that the findings are interpretable at the level of the single individual. Even in individual-level analyses, this can be problematic if one relies on group statistics produced within a variable-oriented framework. The third topic concerns how to handle interactions and nonlinear relationships. The fourth topic concerns the importance of improving measurements so that a good correspondence is achieved between them and the theoretical conceptualisations. The fifth and last topic is concerned with the argument that different ways of investigating the generalisability of the results to different populations should be tried.     

成人学习者主观幸福感特征初探

主观幸福感是测评个体健康人格的一个重要指标,为有所侧重地对成人学习者进行人格教育,本研究对291位成人学习者的主观幸福感现状进行了调查,分析发现：成人学习者在总体生活满意度、积极情感和消极情感以及具体生活满意度上存在性别差异,女生比男生体验到更多的幸福感;独生子女的消极情感得分显著高于非独生子女;家庭经济水平越高,成人学习者对生活的满意程度越高;父母的管教程度并未能造成成人学习者在主观幸福感上的差异;不同学业成绩的成人学习者在总体生活满意度、积极情感和具体生活满意度上存在显著差异,成绩越高者,对生活的满意程度越高,也越容易体验到更多的积极情感。     

大学生主观幸福感研究述评

在介绍主观幸福感的概念、构成和特点的基础上,回顾了大学生主观幸福感的研究现状及测评工具,并着重分析了影响大学生主观幸福感的相关因素,最后针对大学生主观幸福感的测评工具、状况和影响因素、干预等三个方面提出了需要进一步深入研究的问题。     

大学生孤独感对社会支持与主观幸福感的中介效应研究

以685名大学生为调查对象,采用问卷调查法探讨孤独感在大学生社会支持与主观幸福感二者关系间的中介效应。研究结果发现:⑴大学生社会支持、生活满意度、积极情感、消极情感、孤独感变量之间两两相关且均达到显著水平;⑵大学生社会支持对主观幸福感产生正向影响作用;⑶在社会支持对大学生主观幸福感影响中,孤独感起着部分中介作用,且占据优势作用。