An adaptive two-sample location-scale test of lepage type for symmetric distributions

For the two-sample location and scale problem we propose an adaptive test which is based on so called Lepage type tests. The well known test of Lepage (1971) is a combination of the Wilcoxon test for location alternatives and the Ansari-Bradley test for scale alternatives and it behaves well for symmetric and medium-tailed distributions. For the cae of short-, medium- and long-tailed distributions we replace the Wilcoxon test and the .Ansari-Bradley test by suitable other two-sample tests for location and scale, respectively, in oder to get higher power than the classical Lepage test for such distribotions. These tests here are called Lepage type tests. in practice, however, we generally have no clear idea about the distribution having generated our data. Thus, an adaptive test should be applied which takes the the given data set inio consideration. The proposed adaptive test is based on the concept of Hogg (1974), i.e., first, to classify the unknown symmetric distribution function with respect to a measure for tailweight and second, to apply an appropriate Lepage type test for this classified type of distribution. We compare the adaptive test with the three Lepage type tests in the adaptive scheme and with the classical Lepage test as well as with other parametric and nonparametric tests. The power comparison is carried out via Monte Carlo simulation. It is shown that the adaptive test is the best one for the broad class of distributions considered.     

Kurtosis and spread

An increase in kurtosis is achieved through the location- and scale-free movement of probability mass from the “shoulders” of a distribution into its centre and tails. We introduce a coherent structure of ordering and measures, requiring no symmetry assumption, that represent different formalizations of this movement. For this purpose spread functions and spread-spread plots are defined. The orderings impose growth patterns on the spread-spread plot of the distributions involved, and the weakest involve both a specific scale-matching technique and placement of “shoulders”. The role of existing kurtosis orderings and measures in this general context is identified and examples discussed throughout.     

Robustness and power of parametric, nonparametric, robustified and adaptive tests—The multi-sample location problem

This paper deals with a survey of different types of tests, parametric, nonparametric, robustified and adaptive ones, and with an application to the two-sided c-sample location problem. Some concepts of robustness are discussed, such as breakdown point, influence function, gross-error sensitivity and especially α- and β-robustness. A robustness study on level α in the case of heteroscedasticity and nonnormal distributions is carried out via Monte Carlo methods and also a power comparison of all the tests considered. It turns out that robustified versions of the F-test and Welch-test where the original observations are replaced by its ranks behave well over a broad class of distributions, symmetric ones with different tail weight and asymmetric ones, but, on the whole, an adaptive test is to prefer.     

Maximum Test versus Adaptive Tests for the Two-Sample Location Problem

For the non-parametric two-sample location problem, adaptive tests based on a selector statistic are compared with a maximum and a sum test, respectively. When the class of all continuous distributions is not restricted, the sum test is not a robust test, i.e. it does not have a relatively high power across the different possible distributions. However, according to our simulation results, the adaptive tests as well as the maximum test are robust. For a small sample size, the maximum test is preferable, whereas for a large sample size the comparison between the adaptive tests and the maximum test does not show a clear winner. Consequently, one may argue in favour of the maximum test since it is a useful test for all sample sizes. Furthermore, it does not need a selector and the specification of which test is to be performed for which values of the selector. When the family of possible distributions is restricted, the maximin efficiency robust test may be a further robust alternative. However, for the family of t distributions this test is not as powerful as the corresponding maximum test.     

Adaptive bootstrap tests and its competitors in the c-sample scale problem

This paper deals with a study of different types of tests for the two-sided c-sample scale problem. We consider the classical parametric test of Bartlett [M.S. Bartlett, Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests, Proc. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A. 160 (1937), pp. 268–282] several nonparametric tests, especially the test of Fligner and Killeen [M.A. Fligner and T.J. Killeen, Distribution-free two-sample tests for scale, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71 (1976), pp. 210–213], the test of Levene [H. Levene, Robust tests for equality of variances, in Contribution to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin, ed., Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, 1960, pp. 278–292] and a robust version of it introduced by Brown and Forsythe [M.B. Brown and A.B. Forsythe, Robust tests for the equality of variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 (1974), pp. 364–367] as well as two adaptive tests proposed by Büning [H. Büning, Adaptive tests for the c-sample location problem – the case of two-sided alternatives, Comm. Statist.Theory Methods. 25 (1996), pp. 1569–1582] and Büning [H. Büning, An adaptive test for the two sample scale problem, Nr. 2003/10, Diskussionsbeiträge des Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft der Freien Universität Berlin, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe, 2003]. which are based on the principle of Hogg [R.V. Hogg, Adaptive robust procedures. A partial review and some suggestions for future applications and theory, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 (1974), pp. 909–927]. For all the tests we use Bootstrap sampling strategies, too. We compare via Monte Carlo Methods all the tests by investigating level α and power β of the tests for distributions with different strength of tailweight and skewness and for various sample sizes. It turns out that the test of Fligner and Killeen in combination with the bootstrap is the best one among all tests considered.     

Power of One-Sample Location Tests Under Distributions with Equal Lévy Distance

In this article, we study the power of one-sample location tests under classical distributions and two supermodels which include the normal distribution as a special case. The distributions of the supermodels are chosen in such a way that they have equal distance to the normal as the logistic, uniform, double exponential, and the Cauchy, respectively. As a measure of distance we use the Lévy metric. The tests considered are two parametric tests, the t-test and a trimmed t-test, and two nonparametric tests, the sign test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. It turns out that the power of the tests, first of all, does not depend on the Lévy distance but on the special chosen supermodel.