Quantitative Risk Assessment from Farm to Fork and Beyond: A Global Bayesian Approach Concerning Food-Borne Diseases |
| |
Authors: | Isabelle Albert Emmanuel Grenier Jean‐Baptiste Denis Judith Rousseau |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. INRA‐Unité Mét@risk, Paris, France.;2. Reims Management School, Paris, France.;3. INRA‐Unité de recherche MIA, Jouy‐en‐Josas, France.;4. CEREMADE‐Université Paris‐Dauphine, Paris, France. |
| |
Abstract: | A novel approach to the quantitative assessment of food-borne risks is proposed. The basic idea is to use Bayesian techniques in two distinct steps: first by constructing a stochastic core model via a Bayesian network based on expert knowledge, and second, using the data available to improve this knowledge. Unlike the Monte Carlo simulation approach as commonly used in quantitative assessment of food-borne risks where data sets are used independently in each module, our consistent procedure incorporates information conveyed by data throughout the chain. It allows back-calculation in the food chain model, together with the use of data obtained downstream in the food chain. Moreover, the expert knowledge is introduced more simply and consistently than with classical statistical methods. Other advantages of this approach include the clear framework of an iterative learning process, considerable flexibility enabling the use of heterogeneous data, and a justified method to explore the effects of variability and uncertainty. As an illustration, we present an estimation of the probability of contracting a campylobacteriosis as a result of broiler contamination, from the standpoint of quantitative risk assessment. Although the model thus constructed is oversimplified, it clarifies the principles and properties of the method proposed, which demonstrates its ability to deal with quite complex situations and provides a useful basis for further discussions with different experts in the food chain. |
| |
Keywords: | Bayesian network Bayesian statistics broiler campylobacteriosis food-borne disease risk assessment |
|
|