首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

问题与探索:评《民诉法修正案(草案)》对再审程序的修订
引用本文:谢绍静.问题与探索:评《民诉法修正案(草案)》对再审程序的修订[J].学术交流,2012(3):43-46.
作者姓名:谢绍静
作者单位:中国计量学院法学院
摘    要:《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法修正案(草案)》对再审程序的修订,解决了民事再审程序中存在的一些问题,但仍有进一步探讨的空间:有关规定违反诉讼权利平等原则、再审检察建议的效力定位不明、当事人申请再审检察建议或者抗诉的情形有待商榷等。因此,建议删除违反诉讼权利平等原则的条款,取消再审检察建议或者明确界定其与抗诉的效力和适用条件,并将适用条件予以规范表述,从而促进我国民事再审程序更好的完善。

关 键 词:民事诉讼法修正案(草案)  再审程序  检察建议

Problems and Exploration:Comments on modification of rehearing procedure in Amendments to the Draft of Law of Civil Proceedings
Xie Shaojing.Problems and Exploration:Comments on modification of rehearing procedure in Amendments to the Draft of Law of Civil Proceedings[J].Academic Exchange,2012(3):43-46.
Authors:Xie Shaojing
Institution:Xie Shaojing(College of Law,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
Abstract:In the modification of rehearing procedure in Amendments to the Draft of Law of Civil Proceedings,some problems in rehearing procedure were solved,but it deserved further discussion: some provisions offend the principle of equal litigant right,suggestions for retrial and inspection position its function unclearly,the conditions in which the party concerned applied for retrial and inspection or counter-appeal need more discussion,etc.Therefore,the author proposed to delete the articles against equal litigation right,cancel the suggestion for retrial and inspection or define its force with counter-appeal and its application condition,express the condition with standard narration,thereby propelling the improvement of our rehearing civil procedure.
Keywords:Amendments to the Draft of Law of Civil Proceedings  rehearing procedure  inspection suggestion
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号