| 衍音说平议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈怀兴. 衍音说平议[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2013, 0(1): 33-40 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈怀兴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (宁波大学 人文与传媒学院,浙江 宁波 315211) |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJA740081) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 学界流行的衍音说由证明应时而作的“联绵字—双音单纯词”说而来。其实，它得不到语言实践的支持，在汉语史上也不可能存在。论者勇于假设，而不能证实，其理论依据与“衍音联绵词”例均靠不住。
|
| 关 键 词： | 衍音说 衍音联绵词 臆测性 |
An Analysis of Chinese Disyllabic Roots |
| |
| SHEN Huai-xing. An Analysis of Chinese Disyllabic Roots[J]. Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition), 2013, 0(1): 33-40 |
| |
| Authors: | SHEN Huai-xing |
| |
| Affiliation: | (College of Humanities and Media, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The “Syllable–adding Hypothesis” originates from the so called “Disyllabic Monomorphemic Words Hypothesis”. Popular as it is, the “Syllable–adding Hypothesis” can never be testified either in practice or from the historical point of view. Like the “Disyllabic Monomorphemic Words Hypothesis”, the “Syllable–adding Hypothesis” is theoretically and practically invalid |
| |
| Keywords: | Syllable-adding Hypothesis disyllabic roots invalid |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》下载全文 |
