| 物权行为理论的再思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘国涛. 物权行为理论的再思考[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2003, 47(1): 135-138 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘国涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东师范大学,政治法律学院,山东,济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 物权行为是存在的 ,并具有法律行为和事实行为的双重性质。买卖中的物权行为是独立存在的 ,应从第三人的角度考察其无因性才能得出符合法理、情理的结论。善意取得制度和物权行为的无因性具有本质的一致性 ,功能也是互补的。不能以善意取得制度否定物权行为的无因性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 物权行为 民法典 立法 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5973(2003)01-0135-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-11-13 |
Reflection on the Theory of Juristic Acts of Real Rights |
| |
| Liu Guotao. Reflection on the Theory of Juristic Acts of Real Rights[J]. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition), 2003, 47(1): 135-138 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Guotao |
| |
| Abstract: | s: The juristic acts of real rights are existent and have the dual characteristics of juristic act and fact act. The juristic acts in buying and selling is independent, and its abstract nature can only be observed from the third party. The bona fide gain system and the abstract nature of juristic acts of real rights are essentially consistent and functionally complementary. We should not deny the abstract nature of juristic acts of real rights due to the bona fide gain system. |
| |
| Keywords: | juristic acts of real rights civil law legislation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
