| 论《文选》选赋义例二则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冯莉.论《文选》选赋义例二则[J].齐鲁学刊,2008(1):112-115. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冯莉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京语言大学,人文学院,北京,100083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《文选》是按文体选录各类文章佳作的诗文总集。其赋体的编排尚有一些问题值得探讨:《文选》于全部文体中列赋体为首位,体现出萧统自身的文学见解,同时又是受前人编排体例以及大赋体所处地位的双重影响的结果;《文选》将骚、赋分体,具有重要的首创意义,前人骚赋观念混淆不分,萧统别骚于赋反映出其明确的文体辨析意识。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《文选》 赋体 骚体 文体辨析 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-022X(2008)01-0112-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年3月4日 |
On Two Cases of Fu Election in Literary Selection |
| |
| Feng Li.On Two Cases of Fu Election in Literary Selection[J].Qilu Journal,2008(1):112-115. |
| |
| Authors: | Feng Li |
| |
| Abstract: | "Literary Selection"are selected according to various articles style sweetheart of the poems collected.The scheduling of its Fu style still some issues worth exploring:"Literary Selection"lists Fu style at the first in all given out styles,it reflects Xiao Tong own literary insights,at the same time by their predecessors and Fu style presentation of the status of the results of the dual impact;"Literary Selection "discriminates Fu style from Sao style,this initiative has very important significance,predecessors confused of the concept of Sao and Fu style,while the distinction of Sao and,Xiao Tong Fu by Xiao Tong clearly reflects his awareness of style discrimination. |
| |
| Keywords: | Literary Selection Fu style Sao style style discrimination |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
