清代西北边疆民族史研究四题

本文是针对清代西北边疆民族史存在的某些问题进行研究的文章。全文共分四部分。 ( 1)准噶尔兵锋到达黑海沿岸说考辨。文中主要论述了 16— 17世纪时诺盖人的迁徙与分布情况 ,指出1682— 1683年间噶尔丹举兵进军哈萨克时 ,根本不可能自锡尔河流域跨越哈萨克草原而到达黑海沿岸。 ( 2 )此噶尔丹非彼噶尔丹。主要针对个别学者将昭《啸亭杂录》“萨赖尔之叛”中提到的“噶尔丹”比附为康熙时的“噶尔丹”的观点进行剖析。 ( 3)萨喇勒与萨赖尔是一人非二人。文中论述了萨喇勒、萨赖尔是史籍中对同一个人物的不同称呼 ,指出有关著述将其当做两个不同人物处理是不恰当的。 ( 4 )阿布赉被俘及与噶尔丹策零关系考实。有关阿布赉被俘经过及其与噶尔丹策零关系 ,学术界长期以来流行着一种观点 ,认为是由其杀死噶尔丹策零之子引起的 ,并力图夸大其与噶尔丹策零的紧张关系。作者通过大量事实 ,否定了这种说法

A Study of Ethnic Minority History on Four Topics concerning the Northwestern Frontier in the Qing Dynasty

This paper is directed to some problems existing in the historical studies on ethnic minorities in the northwestern frontier in the Qing Dynasty. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part is a discussion about the statement that the Dzungharianforce once reached the coast of the Black Sea. This part discusses the migration of the Nogaiansand their distribution in the 16th 17th centuries. The author points out that, when Dgaldan's troops attacked Kazakhin the period of 1682 1683, it was impossible for themto go across the Kazakh Steppe from the Syrdarya Riverand reach the Black Sea. The second part is about the identity of Dgaldan, because there were several Dgaldans in the history and there has occurred some confusion in researches concerned. The third part points out that Salale and Salair are identical, instead of two persons. Slale and Salair are different names for the same person in historical records. It is inappropriate that some researches regard Salale and Salair as two different persons. Part four discusses the relation of the capture of Abulai to Dgaldan Celing. A viewpoint has long prevailed in the academic circle that Abulai was captured because he killed the son of Dgaldan Celing. And some researchers attempted to exaggerate the tension between Abulai and Dgaldan Celing. The author denies this statement by a lot of historical facts.