首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"法官文官化"质疑
引用本文:许志成."法官文官化"质疑[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2006,21(2):38-40.
作者姓名:许志成
作者单位:四川师范大学,法学院,四川,成都,610068
摘    要:<公务员法>的颁布具有重要的现实意义,但也存在着公务员泛化问题.立法上难以克服的"法官文官化"即是其中之一.由于司法与行政的巨大差异,"法官文官化"会加剧行政权对司法权的吞噬,摧残司法独立,进而对法治建设不可避免地带来负面影响;鉴于法官和行政工作人员的不同性质,时它们也不能实行同样的公务员考试制度.

关 键 词:公务员法  法官文官化  司法独立  公务员考试
文章编号:1672-8580(2006)02-0038-03
修稿时间:2005年11月3日

Doubts on "Civil-servant-trend of Judges"
XU Zhi-cheng.Doubts on "Civil-servant-trend of Judges"[J].Journal of Sichuau University of Science & Engineering:Social Sciences Edition,2006,21(2):38-40.
Authors:XU Zhi-cheng
Abstract:The enaction of Civil Servant Act is of great practical significance but also faces problems of civil servants generalization, one of which is "civil-servant-trend of judges" in legislation field. Due to the great differences between judicatory and administration, "civil-servant-trend of judges" will aggravate the interference administration into judiciary and harm independence of jurisdiction to bring negative influence on the construction of judicial system. Because of the different nature of the employees in judicial and administrative system, the same civil servant examination can not be applied to them.
Keywords:Civil Servant Act  civil-servant-trend of judges  independence of jurisdiction  civil service examination
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号