公开盗窃理论构建的认识论与方法论质评

公开盗窃学说在理论前提的认识上,置盗窃的秘密性于无关紧要的地位,这种学说以现实存在公开盗窃作为立论依据采取循环思维想当然地借鉴国外刑法学说,主观地解读处罚上的空隙,因而该学说在理论构建的必要性上存在认识论上的偏差。同时,公开盗窃说在理论证成上不恰当地使用了文理解释、历史解释和比较解释的方法,在确立盗窃罪的边界以及建立盗窃罪和抢夺罪等其他侵犯财产罪的区分标准上均不完满,由此,公开盗窃理论在构建方法上也存在合理性和可行性的问题。在盗窃罪学说上应当进行理论辨正,维护盗窃罪秘密窃取的罪质内涵。

Assessment on Open-theft Theory in Epistemology and Methodology

In the premise of cognition, open-theft theory makes no importance of the secrecy. This theory takes existing truth as a premise to adopt circular thinking, takes the foreign theory for granted to be assumed, and interprets penalty gap subjectively. So, in epistemology, there is deficient for the necessity of establishing the theory. In the arguments of the theory, it inappropriately uses literal interpretation, historical interpretation and comparative interpretation. It is not perfect in establishing the boundary of theft crime and distinction with robbery and other crimes of property. Therefore, it is questionable for the rationality and feasibility to construct open-theft theory in methodology. The theft theory should be reassessed, so as to maintain and develop the traditional theory of secret-theft.